Fact Check: Obama won the presidency because of his skin colour

Fact Check: Obama won the presidency because of his skin colour

Published March 12, 2025Updated June 18, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "Obama won the presidency because of his skin colour" ## What We Know The claim that Barack Obama won the presidency primarily due to h...

Fact Check: "Obama won the presidency because of his skin colour"

What We Know

The claim that Barack Obama won the presidency primarily due to his skin color is a complex assertion that intersects with various sociopolitical factors. Research indicates that racial dynamics played a significant role in the 2008 election. A study by BF Schaffner highlights that overt racism can depress support for African American candidates, suggesting that some white voters may refuse to support a candidate based solely on their race (source-1).

Moreover, the perception of Obama's skin tone influenced voter reactions. A study published in Science found that people's political affiliations affected how they perceived Obama's skin color, with liberals tending to prefer lighter images of him, while conservatives preferred darker ones (source-4). This suggests that racial perceptions were indeed a factor in how voters engaged with Obama as a candidate.

Additionally, Randall Kennedy's book, The Persistence of the Color Line, discusses the complex relationship between Obama and his African American constituency, emphasizing the challenges posed by racial politics during his presidency (source-2).

Analysis

While it is evident that race played a role in the election, attributing Obama's victory solely to his skin color oversimplifies the multifaceted nature of electoral politics. Obama's campaign was also characterized by a strong platform that resonated with a wide range of voters, including his messages on hope and change, which appealed to many beyond racial lines (source-5).

The claim also overlooks the historical context of Obama's candidacy. His election represented a significant moment in U.S. history, marking the first time an African American held the presidency, which itself was a powerful symbol of progress in race relations (source-6).

However, the racial dynamics surrounding his candidacy cannot be dismissed. Studies indicate that racial biases did influence voter behavior, and the media portrayal of Obama often played into racial stereotypes, which may have affected public perception (source-3, source-7).

Conclusion

The claim that Obama won the presidency because of his skin color is Partially True. While race certainly played a significant role in shaping perceptions and reactions during his campaign, it is overly simplistic to attribute his victory solely to this factor. Obama's success was also due to his political platform, the historical significance of his candidacy, and the broader socio-political context of the time.

Sources

  1. Racial Salience and the Obama Vote - Projects at Harvard Link
  2. The Persistence of the Color Line: Racial Politics and the Obama Presidency Link
  3. What color is Obama? These researchers examined reactions when his skin looks darker Link
  4. Skin Color Is in the Eye of the Beholder | Science - AAAS Link
  5. Barack Obama legacy: Did he improve US race relations? Link
  6. Shifts In Race Relations Since Obama's Election Link
  7. Biases in the Perception of Barack Obama's Skin Tone Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Obama became president illegally because he was born in Kenya.

The Bush family is involved in the New World Order (NWO).

Hillary Clinton was passed over by the Vatican for the presidency because people care more about race than character.

The Vatican is described as "Satan's earthly HQ" and supposedly orchestrates various political events.

Trump was anti-Illuminati, fought a stolen election, and was targeted by a coup and various conspiracies.

The COVID-19 mRNA vaccine is framed as part of a satanic/globalist plan (NWO).

Jesus gave Trump two terms because of what the Vatican did on 9/11.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Obama became president illegally because he was born in Kenya. The Bush family is involved in the New World Order (NWO). Hillary Clinton was passed over by the Vatican for the presidency because people care more about race than character. The Vatican is described as "Satan's earthly HQ" and supposedly orchestrates various political events. Trump was anti-Illuminati, fought a stolen election, and was targeted by a coup and various conspiracies. The COVID-19 mRNA vaccine is framed as part of a satanic/globalist plan (NWO). Jesus gave Trump two terms because of what the Vatican did on 9/11.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Obama became president illegally because he was born in Kenya. The Bush family is involved in the New World Order (NWO). Hillary Clinton was passed over by the Vatican for the presidency because people care more about race than character. The Vatican is described as "Satan's earthly HQ" and supposedly orchestrates various political events. Trump was anti-Illuminati, fought a stolen election, and was targeted by a coup and various conspiracies. The COVID-19 mRNA vaccine is framed as part of a satanic/globalist plan (NWO). Jesus gave Trump two terms because of what the Vatican did on 9/11.

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
I cannot believe that Trump is
cutting Medicaid. Actually,
what I meant to say is that I
can't believe he's not cutting
more of it because medicaid is
a money laundering scheme for
your government.
Congratulations all you
bleeding heart democrats.
Instead of raging against the
machine, you're bending over
for it. Medicaid is jointly run
by the states and the feds and
for every one dollar that your
state allocates to the program,
the Feds turn around and match
that at a level of one 00
percent so one dollar up to
nine dollars. And this money
comes from taxpayers in other
00:34
states. Your money has a 900%
return rate at someone else's
expense. Why wouldn't you
expand the program? Thanks
Obama. That's exactly how we
wound up with way too many
Medicaid recipients in the
first place. Like everything
related to healthcare the
providers are in bed with the
government on this one too
because the government can tax
the providers. 1. Use that
dollar to collect the up to
nine dollars in federal funds
and to reimburse the provider
their original dollar. What?
Robbing the taxpayer to pad the
funding pool leading to
increase reimbursements for
01:06
Medicaid for the providers.
Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a
health care facility, I'm
saying sign me up to that. Yes,
the medical industrial complex
totally has your best interest
in mind so go ahead and swallow
up those vaccines like a good
little comrade. Age me harder
daddy. And speaking of
comrades, do you know how many
people in this country receive
Medicaid that shouldn't? Before
you start screaming, everyone
should get free health care.
Not the argument here. We do
not have universal health care
in the United States. It
doesn't work and since we don't
have it, that means someone is
paying for it and guess what?
There are lower-income families
01:37
who don't qualify for the
benefits but they're taxpayers
and they're being burdened by
this. Back to the point which
is that the system is insanely
abused. I used to do child
support referee work for years
and you would v
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Obama's presidency (2009-2017) had the highest total removals, over 3.2 million
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Obama's presidency (2009-2017) had the highest total removals, over 3.2 million

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Obama's presidency (2009-2017) had the highest total removals, over 3.2 million

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Obama's 'silent coup' isn't immune, Mark Levin calls for full DOJ probe
Partially True

Fact Check: Obama's 'silent coup' isn't immune, Mark Levin calls for full DOJ probe

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Obama's 'silent coup' isn't immune, Mark Levin calls for full DOJ probe

Aug 23, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Did Obama go overseas and apologize for America?
Partially True

Fact Check: Did Obama go overseas and apologize for America?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Did Obama go overseas and apologize for America?

Aug 22, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: When Obama was president did he say that we are no longer a Christian nation
Partially True

Fact Check: When Obama was president did he say that we are no longer a Christian nation

Detailed fact-check analysis of: When Obama was president did he say that we are no longer a Christian nation

Aug 22, 2025
Read more →