Fact Check: Non transparent lobbyism is hidden propaganda among politicians.

Fact Check: Non transparent lobbyism is hidden propaganda among politicians.

Published July 29, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact-Check Article: "Non transparent lobbyism is hidden propaganda among politicians." ## What We Know The claim that "non transparent lobbyism is ...

Fact-Check Article: "Non transparent lobbyism is hidden propaganda among politicians."

What We Know

The claim that "non transparent lobbyism is hidden propaganda among politicians" suggests that lobbying activities, particularly those lacking transparency, function as a form of covert propaganda influencing political decisions.

  1. Lobbying and Transparency: According to the Brookings Institution, there is a significant public perception that lobbying is a corrupting force in Washington, with polls indicating widespread belief that lobbyists negatively impact legislation. The lack of transparency in lobbying activities makes it difficult for the public and media to track which lobbyists are meeting with politicians and what issues they are advocating for.

  2. Legislative Framework: The Anti-Lobbying Act prohibits the use of federal funds for lobbying activities intended to influence legislation. This act aims to maintain transparency and accountability in government communications, although it allows for certain types of communication by federal officials. The act's restrictions suggest that there are legal frameworks in place to limit the influence of lobbying, which can be seen as a response to concerns about hidden agendas.

  3. Public Perception and Ethical Concerns: A study published by the Media Engagement Project discusses the ethical implications of lobbying, suggesting that the perception of lobbying as "legalized bribery" can undermine public trust in democracy (source-4). This perception aligns with the idea that lobbying can serve as a form of hidden propaganda if it operates without transparency.

  4. Impact on Democracy: Research indicates that lobbying can pose challenges to democratic processes, as it often favors well-funded interests over the general public (source-5). This imbalance raises concerns about the integrity of political representation and the potential for lobbying to act as a covert means of influencing policy decisions.

Analysis

The evidence surrounding the claim reveals a complex relationship between lobbying, transparency, and the potential for propaganda:

  • Credibility of Sources: The sources cited provide a mix of legal, ethical, and public opinion perspectives on lobbying. The Brookings Institution is a reputable think tank known for its research on governance and public policy, lending credibility to its analysis of lobbying practices. Similarly, the NIH Ethics Guidelines offer a legal framework that underscores the importance of transparency in lobbying, although they also highlight the limitations of existing laws.

  • Public Perception vs. Reality: While the public perceives lobbying as a corrupting influence, the actual mechanisms of lobbying are more nuanced. As noted by the Brookings Institution, lobbyists play a role in providing information and expertise to lawmakers, which can be beneficial but also raises questions about whose interests are represented (source-2). The ethical concerns about lobbying as a form of "legalized bribery" (source-4) further complicate the narrative, suggesting that while lobbying can be legitimate, it often operates in a gray area that can appear deceptive.

  • Legislative Protections: The Anti-Lobbying Act and related guidelines aim to curb the influence of lobbying by restricting the use of federal funds for such activities. However, the effectiveness of these measures is debated, as they may not fully address the transparency issues that allow lobbying to function as hidden propaganda (source-1).

Conclusion

The claim that "non transparent lobbyism is hidden propaganda among politicians" is Partially True. While there are legitimate concerns about the lack of transparency in lobbying and its potential to influence political decisions covertly, lobbying also serves a functional role in the legislative process. The ethical implications and public perceptions of lobbying as a corrupting force highlight the need for greater transparency and accountability in political advocacy. However, the existence of legal frameworks aimed at regulating lobbying activities indicates that not all lobbying is inherently deceptive or propagandistic.

Sources

  1. Lobbying and Publicity or Propaganda Guidelines | NIH Ethics
  2. A Better Way to Fix Lobbying - Brookings
  3. The Lobbying Disclosure Act at 20: Analysis and Issues for Congress
  4. Political Speech or Legalized Bribery? The Ethical Concerns of Lobbying
  5. Hidden in plain sight: how lobby organisations undermine democracy
  6. Layers of Lobbying: Federal and state lobbying trends in America
  7. The Hidden World of Lobbying in American Politics

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Propaganda in democracies is not declared, neither its purpose nor its consequences. Moral, honor and critical thinking hardly function normally under propaganda and nontransparent hypnotic lobbyism.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Propaganda in democracies is not declared, neither its purpose nor its consequences. Moral, honor and critical thinking hardly function normally under propaganda and nontransparent hypnotic lobbyism.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Propaganda in democracies is not declared, neither its purpose nor its consequences. Moral, honor and critical thinking hardly function normally under propaganda and nontransparent hypnotic lobbyism.

Jul 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: More than $100 million was raised at the celebrity "Fire Aid" concert. That money was supposed to go to victims of the Pacific Palisades fires. Instead, all of the money went to non-profit organizations.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: More than $100 million was raised at the celebrity "Fire Aid" concert. That money was supposed to go to victims of the Pacific Palisades fires. Instead, all of the money went to non-profit organizations.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: More than $100 million was raised at the celebrity "Fire Aid" concert. That money was supposed to go to victims of the Pacific Palisades fires. Instead, all of the money went to non-profit organizations.

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Russian government will block all non Russian internet in next years
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Russian government will block all non Russian internet in next years

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Russian government will block all non Russian internet in next years

Jul 29, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Ghislaine Maxwell was wrongfully prosecuted despite a non-prosecution agreement.
Partially True

Fact Check: Ghislaine Maxwell was wrongfully prosecuted despite a non-prosecution agreement.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Ghislaine Maxwell was wrongfully prosecuted despite a non-prosecution agreement.

Jul 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Did Sonic Chronicle game is considered as non canon ?
Partially True

Fact Check: Did Sonic Chronicle game is considered as non canon ?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Did Sonic Chronicle game is considered as non canon ?

Jul 5, 2025
Read more →