TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: No tax on tips could drastically impact service industry earnings.

Fact Check: No tax on tips could drastically impact service industry earnings.

Published June 19, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "No tax on tips could drastically impact service industry earnings." ## What We Know The claim that eliminating taxes on tips could dra...

Fact Check: "No tax on tips could drastically impact service industry earnings."

What We Know

The claim that eliminating taxes on tips could drastically impact service industry earnings is rooted in a recent proposal to amend tax laws regarding tips. The proposed legislation, part of a broader tax package, aims to allow service workers to deduct their reported tip income from federal income taxes, while still subjecting those tips to payroll taxes, including Social Security and Medicare taxes (source-1).

The primary beneficiaries of this proposal would be workers in industries that rely heavily on tips, such as restaurant servers, rideshare drivers, and beauty service providers. However, it is important to note that many tipped workers do not currently owe federal income tax due to their low earnings. In fact, approximately 37% of tipped workers earn too little to owe federal income tax at all (source-1).

Furthermore, while the proposal could provide some financial relief, it is estimated that only about 3% of families would benefit significantly from this tax deduction, with the average tax cut for those who do benefiting being around $1,700, but only $200 for the lowest-income families (source-2).

Analysis

The claim suggests a significant impact on service industry earnings due to the proposed tax changes. While it is true that the proposal aims to help service workers retain more of their earnings, the actual effects may be more limited than the claim implies. The proposal does not eliminate all taxes on tips; it allows for a deduction from federal income taxes but maintains payroll tax obligations (source-1).

The reliability of the sources used in this analysis is generally high. The information from CU Boulder and Yale's Budget Lab provides a detailed examination of the proposal's implications, while The New York Times and TIME offer broader context on how such tax changes could affect workers and the economy (source-3; source-4).

However, the potential for unintended consequences, such as changes in customer tipping behavior or state-level tax implications, adds complexity to the analysis. For instance, if customers perceive that workers are keeping more of their tips, they might reduce the amount they tip, which could negate some of the benefits of the tax change (source-1).

Conclusion

The claim that "no tax on tips could drastically impact service industry earnings" is Partially True. While the proposal to eliminate federal income taxes on tips could provide some financial relief to service workers, the actual impact may be limited due to the continued obligation for payroll taxes and the fact that many tipped workers do not currently owe federal income tax. The benefits of the proposed changes are likely to be unevenly distributed, with only a small percentage of families seeing significant tax relief.

Sources

  1. What 'no tax on tips' really means for service workers—and everyone ...
  2. Budgetary, Distributional, and Tax Avoidance Considerations
  3. How 'No Tax on Tips' Will Affect Waiters, Drivers and Diners
  4. What the 'No Tax on Tips' Bill Means for Employees | TIME
  5. No Tax on Tips: Tax Exemption on Tips 2025 Updates - Paycom
  6. The No Tax on Tips Act: A Historic Shift in Tax Policy

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Senator Ashley Moody and President Trump just delivered—for YOU. ✅ No tax on tips. ✅ No tax on overtime. ✅ Medicare protected.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Senator Ashley Moody and President Trump just delivered—for YOU. ✅ No tax on tips. ✅ No tax on overtime. ✅ Medicare protected.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senator Ashley Moody and President Trump just delivered—for YOU. ✅ No tax on tips. ✅ No tax on overtime. ✅ Medicare protected.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Donald Trump promised "no tax on tips" during his campaign, and his "big, beautiful bill" actually followed through on that promise until you read the fine print. While Trump is out bragging about no longer having tax on tipped wages, the REAL language of the bill shows that only the first $25,000 of tipped wages are eligible as a "deduction, not a complete reduction on taxes. The whole thing was a scam from the beginning.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Donald Trump promised "no tax on tips" during his campaign, and his "big, beautiful bill" actually followed through on that promise until you read the fine print. While Trump is out bragging about no longer having tax on tipped wages, the REAL language of the bill shows that only the first $25,000 of tipped wages are eligible as a "deduction, not a complete reduction on taxes. The whole thing was a scam from the beginning.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donald Trump promised "no tax on tips" during his campaign, and his "big, beautiful bill" actually followed through on that promise until you read the fine print. While Trump is out bragging about no longer having tax on tipped wages, the REAL language of the bill shows that only the first $25,000 of tipped wages are eligible as a "deduction, not a complete reduction on taxes. The whole thing was a scam from the beginning.

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 125 Americans are shot and killed every day, and 200 MORE are injured — and Republicans just eliminated the tax on gun silencers as part of their “Big (Not-So) Beautiful Bill (Now Law).” Republicans added a provision in the final hours eliminates a nearly-century-old tax — which is currently $200 — for purchasing or making silencers, short-barreled rifles and shotguns, and other weapons.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: 125 Americans are shot and killed every day, and 200 MORE are injured — and Republicans just eliminated the tax on gun silencers as part of their “Big (Not-So) Beautiful Bill (Now Law).” Republicans added a provision in the final hours eliminates a nearly-century-old tax — which is currently $200 — for purchasing or making silencers, short-barreled rifles and shotguns, and other weapons.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 125 Americans are shot and killed every day, and 200 MORE are injured — and Republicans just eliminated the tax on gun silencers as part of their “Big (Not-So) Beautiful Bill (Now Law).” Republicans added a provision in the final hours eliminates a nearly-century-old tax — which is currently $200 — for purchasing or making silencers, short-barreled rifles and shotguns, and other weapons.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.
Partially True

Fact Check: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: House Republicans "shut down [the] whole place to avoid releasing the files" and that they "stayed up all night a few weeks ago to steal your healthcare and give billionaires tax breaks."
Partially True

Fact Check: House Republicans "shut down [the] whole place to avoid releasing the files" and that they "stayed up all night a few weeks ago to steal your healthcare and give billionaires tax breaks."

Detailed fact-check analysis of: House Republicans "shut down [the] whole place to avoid releasing the files" and that they "stayed up all night a few weeks ago to steal your healthcare and give billionaires tax breaks."

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks