Fact Check: KEAM is harder exam than CUSAT CAT

Fact Check: "KEAM is harder exam than CUSAT CAT"

What We Know

The claim that "KEAM is a harder exam than CUSAT CAT" has been a topic of discussion among students preparing for these entrance examinations. Both KEAM (Kerala Engineering Architecture Medical) and CUSAT CAT (Cochin University of Science and Technology Common Admission Test) are crucial for students seeking admission to engineering programs in Kerala.

KEAM Exam Analysis

According to a 2025 analysis, the difficulty level of KEAM varies by subject. Physics is noted to be particularly challenging, while Chemistry is considered easier. The general consensus among students is that while some questions can be tricky, many are manageable.

CUSAT CAT Exam Analysis

In contrast, a 2023 analysis of the CUSAT CAT indicates that it is perceived as easier than KEAM. Students have found it more straightforward to complete the 250 multiple-choice questions (MCQs) within the allotted time.

Expert Opinions

Some experts and students have expressed that CUSAT CAT is easier to crack compared to KEAM, attributing this to the exam structure and types of questions presented. Anecdotal evidence suggests that higher ranks in CUSAT CAT may correlate with a perception of its syllabus being tougher, but this is subjective and varies by individual experience [source-4].

Analysis

The evidence surrounding the difficulty of KEAM and CUSAT CAT is largely based on subjective opinions and experiences. Sources like Collegedekho and Embibe provide analyses based on student feedback, but these may carry biases as they aim to attract students to their preparatory resources.

While the analyses indicate that KEAM presents challenges, particularly in Physics, the perception of difficulty is not universally agreed upon. The Careers360 platform offers a mix of student opinions and expert advice but may cater to a specific audience, influencing the representation of difficulty levels.

The methodologies used in these analyses often rely on subjective feedback rather than standardized metrics, which complicates the comparison. For a more objective assessment, statistical data such as pass rates, average scores, and detailed breakdowns of question types would be beneficial.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True
The claim that "KEAM is harder than CUSAT CAT" is partially true, as there are valid points on both sides. While some evidence suggests that KEAM is more challenging, especially in specific subjects like Physics, other analyses indicate that CUSAT CAT is generally perceived as easier due to its structure and question types. The primary evidence consists of anecdotal accounts and subjective analyses, which may not accurately reflect the overall difficulty of the exams. Therefore, while there are arguments supporting the claim, the lack of definitive evidence and the subjective nature of the sources lead to a conclusion that is not entirely conclusive.