Fact Check: Judge warns Uthmeier's actions could lead to unconstitutional law findings.

Fact Check: Judge warns Uthmeier's actions could lead to unconstitutional law findings.

Published June 18, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: Judge warns Uthmeier's actions could lead to unconstitutional law findings ## What We Know A federal judge, Kathleen M. Williams, recen...

Fact Check: Judge warns Uthmeier's actions could lead to unconstitutional law findings

What We Know

A federal judge, Kathleen M. Williams, recently held Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier in civil contempt of court for defying her order regarding a new immigration enforcement law in Florida. The law, signed by Governor Ron DeSantis, made it a state crime for unauthorized immigrants to enter Florida. Judge Williams had previously issued a restraining order in April, stating that the provision was likely unconstitutional and barred its enforcement (New York Times, NBC News).

Uthmeier's actions included telling law enforcement that he could not "prevent" them from making arrests under the disputed law, which Judge Williams interpreted as a direct challenge to her authority. In her ruling, she emphasized that "litigants cannot change the plain meaning of words as it suits them" and warned that failure to comply with court orders could lead to "anarchy" (New York Times, Miami Herald).

The judge ordered Uthmeier to submit biweekly reports detailing any law enforcement actions taken under the law, reinforcing the seriousness of her order and the potential consequences of noncompliance (NBC News, Miami Herald).

Analysis

The claim that Judge Williams warned Uthmeier's actions could lead to unconstitutional law findings is substantiated by her statements during the contempt ruling. She explicitly noted that Uthmeier's defiance of her orders could undermine the rule of law and lead to significant legal chaos. This assertion is supported by her comments about the potential for "anarchy" if state officials do not adhere to judicial directives (New York Times, Miami Herald).

Uthmeier's interpretation of the court's order as overly broad and his public statements suggesting that he would not comply with it further complicate the legal landscape. His remarks, which included a defiant stance against the judge's authority, were cited by Judge Williams as exacerbating the situation and increasing the risk of harm from noncompliance (NBC News, Fox 13 News).

The sources used in this analysis are credible and come from established news organizations, which enhances their reliability. The New York Times, NBC News, and Miami Herald are known for their thorough reporting and legal analysis, making them trustworthy references for this legal matter.

Conclusion

The claim that Judge Williams warned Uthmeier's actions could lead to unconstitutional law findings is True. The judge's ruling and her explicit warnings about the implications of Uthmeier's defiance of her orders substantiate this claim. Her concerns about the potential for anarchy and the undermining of the rule of law highlight the seriousness of the situation and the constitutional implications of Uthmeier's actions.

Sources

  1. Florida Attorney General Defied Order Blocking Part of ...
  2. Judge finds Florida attorney general in contempt for ...
  3. Federal judge finds FL attorney general in contempt of court
  4. Judge finds Florida AG in contempt over immigration law
  5. Florida attorney general held in contempt after enforcing ...
  6. Uthmeier responds as judge weighs contempt
  7. Florida can't enforce a new immigration law while court ...
  8. Federal judge finds Uthmeier in contempt

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: A judge can be criminally prosecuted for actions taken in official capacity.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: A judge can be criminally prosecuted for actions taken in official capacity.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: A judge can be criminally prosecuted for actions taken in official capacity.

Jul 9, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 	
After a judge ruled Trump
illegally fired FTC
commissioner Rebecca Slaughter,
the DOJ appealed to block her
return arguing that shocker,
president should be allowed to
axe watchdogs
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: After a judge ruled Trump illegally fired FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, the DOJ appealed to block her return arguing that shocker, president should be allowed to axe watchdogs

Detailed fact-check analysis of: After a judge ruled Trump illegally fired FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, the DOJ appealed to block her return arguing that shocker, president should be allowed to axe watchdogs

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: "Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?" The Epstein records were sealed by a judge until after Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. They weren't unsealed until January 2024. So no, Biden couldn't release what wasn't legally available. Biden didn't run a cult. He He let the DOJ operate independently y-unlike Trump, who demands loyalty oaths and treats every agency like his personal operatives. And no Democrat ran on a platform promising to release the Epstein files. Trump did. Then blocked them.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: "Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?" The Epstein records were sealed by a judge until after Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. They weren't unsealed until January 2024. So no, Biden couldn't release what wasn't legally available. Biden didn't run a cult. He He let the DOJ operate independently y-unlike Trump, who demands loyalty oaths and treats every agency like his personal operatives. And no Democrat ran on a platform promising to release the Epstein files. Trump did. Then blocked them.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: "Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?" The Epstein records were sealed by a judge until after Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. They weren't unsealed until January 2024. So no, Biden couldn't release what wasn't legally available. Biden didn't run a cult. He He let the DOJ operate independently y-unlike Trump, who demands loyalty oaths and treats every agency like his personal operatives. And no Democrat ran on a platform promising to release the Epstein files. Trump did. Then blocked them.

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Trump administration's asylum proclamation was ruled unlawful by a federal judge.
True

Fact Check: The Trump administration's asylum proclamation was ruled unlawful by a federal judge.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Trump administration's asylum proclamation was ruled unlawful by a federal judge.

Jul 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Judge Delivers FINAL Ruling-
Texas Dems Who Fled Just Learned Their Fate
Partially True

Fact Check: Judge Delivers FINAL Ruling- Texas Dems Who Fled Just Learned Their Fate

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Judge Delivers FINAL Ruling- Texas Dems Who Fled Just Learned Their Fate

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll
Partially True

Fact Check: Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Judge warns Uthmeier's actions could lead to unconstitutional law findings. | TruthOrFake Blog