Fact Check: 	
After a judge ruled Trump
illegally fired FTC
commissioner Rebecca Slaughter,
the DOJ appealed to block her
return arguing that shocker,
president should be allowed to
axe watchdogs

Fact Check: After a judge ruled Trump illegally fired FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, the DOJ appealed to block her return arguing that shocker, president should be allowed to axe watchdogs

Published July 31, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact-Check: "After a judge ruled Trump illegally fired FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, the DOJ appealed to block her return arguing that shocker...

Advertisement
NordVPN - Explore the internet securely and privately

Secure your internet browsing withNordVPN's trusted protection

Fact-Check: "After a judge ruled Trump illegally fired FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, the DOJ appealed to block her return arguing that shocker, president should be allowed to axe watchdogs"

What We Know

In July 2025, a federal court ruled that President Donald Trump's firing of Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, a Democratic commissioner at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), was illegal. Judge Loren AliKhan stated that Slaughter was a "rightful member" of the agency and that her removal violated longstanding legal protections for FTC commissioners, who can only be dismissed for specific reasons. The ruling emphasized that Slaughter's purported removal was "unlawful and without legal effect" (New York Times, AP News).

Following the ruling, the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed an appeal to block Slaughter's reinstatement, arguing that the president has the constitutional authority to remove executive officers, including those overseeing regulatory agencies like the FTC (Reuters, The Hill). The DOJ's position reflects a broader interpretation of executive power, which has been upheld in previous Supreme Court rulings (New York Times).

Analysis

The claim that the DOJ appealed to block Slaughter's return after a judge ruled her firing illegal is substantiated by multiple credible sources. The New York Times and Reuters both reported on the court's ruling and the subsequent DOJ appeal, confirming the timeline and the legal arguments presented by both sides. The sources are reputable, with the New York Times being a well-established news organization known for its thorough reporting, while Reuters is recognized for its global news coverage and adherence to journalistic standards.

The appeal by the DOJ indicates a significant legal battle over the extent of presidential powers in dismissing regulatory officials. The argument that the president should have the authority to "axe watchdogs" aligns with the DOJ's defense of executive power, which has been a contentious issue in U.S. politics, particularly during Trump's presidency (The Hill, Politico).

However, the ruling by Judge AliKhan challenges this view by reinforcing the protections afforded to FTC commissioners, suggesting that the legal precedent may not support the DOJ's appeal. The judge's decision is grounded in constitutional protections that have been in place for nearly a century, which adds weight to Slaughter's position (Consumer Finance Monitor, Politico).

Conclusion

The claim that the DOJ appealed to block Rebecca Slaughter's return after a judge ruled her firing illegal is True. The evidence from multiple reputable sources confirms that a federal court found Trump's firing of Slaughter to be unlawful, and the DOJ subsequently sought to challenge this ruling, arguing for the president's authority to dismiss regulatory officials. This situation highlights ongoing tensions regarding executive power and the independence of regulatory agencies.

Sources

  1. US appeals court temporarily blocks order reinstating FTC commissioner
  2. Court Rules Trump's Firing of F.T.C. Commissioner Was Illegal
  3. Judge restores Democrat to Federal Trade Commission
  4. Federal Judge rules that firing of Rebecca Slaughter as FTC Commissioner was illegal
  5. Judge rules Donald Trump's firing of Rebecca Kelly Slaughter
  6. Judge says Trump's firing of FTC commissioner was illegal
  7. Judge says Trump’s firing of FTC commissioner was illegal
  8. D.C. District Court Finds President Trump's Firing of FTC Commissioner Illegal
Advertisement
NordVPN - Explore the internet securely and privately

Secure your internet browsing withNordVPN's trusted protection

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: "Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?" The Epstein records were sealed by a judge until after Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. They weren't unsealed until January 2024. So no, Biden couldn't release what wasn't legally available. Biden didn't run a cult. He He let the DOJ operate independently y-unlike Trump, who demands loyalty oaths and treats every agency like his personal operatives. And no Democrat ran on a platform promising to release the Epstein files. Trump did. Then blocked them.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: "Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?" The Epstein records were sealed by a judge until after Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. They weren't unsealed until January 2024. So no, Biden couldn't release what wasn't legally available. Biden didn't run a cult. He He let the DOJ operate independently y-unlike Trump, who demands loyalty oaths and treats every agency like his personal operatives. And no Democrat ran on a platform promising to release the Epstein files. Trump did. Then blocked them.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: "Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?" The Epstein records were sealed by a judge until after Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. They weren't unsealed until January 2024. So no, Biden couldn't release what wasn't legally available. Biden didn't run a cult. He He let the DOJ operate independently y-unlike Trump, who demands loyalty oaths and treats every agency like his personal operatives. And no Democrat ran on a platform promising to release the Epstein files. Trump did. Then blocked them.

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  A Trump-appointed judge overturned a Biden-era rule that removed medical debt from credit reports. The ruling came days after Republicans voted to kick millions of Americans off healthcare which will likely cause medical debt to skyrocket.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: A Trump-appointed judge overturned a Biden-era rule that removed medical debt from credit reports. The ruling came days after Republicans voted to kick millions of Americans off healthcare which will likely cause medical debt to skyrocket.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: A Trump-appointed judge overturned a Biden-era rule that removed medical debt from credit reports. The ruling came days after Republicans voted to kick millions of Americans off healthcare which will likely cause medical debt to skyrocket.

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
🔍
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I'm Christy Nome here in Texas with my boots on the ground after this devastating tragedy that was absolutely not preventable and we are in no way responsible for it after visiting here I recently found out that Habius Corpus is the name of a city here in Texas and is in fact not a legal term which means the president can do whatever he wants. I have been told by some people that in addition to being the Secretary of Homeland Security that does also make me the head of Fema Fema sounds like female or feminism and that's DEI and 00:34 I don't believe in that. President Trump has entrusted me to be in charge of Fema which is not a federal emergency management agency. In fact, all emergencies are actually being managed by the state and the reason why I am here is to make sure to get some good film for my B roll. It is completely disgusting that there are people out there who are trying to politicize the devastation that happened here in Texas and I would like to remind everyone that it is only okay to politicize natural disasters when they happen in 01:04 blue states.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I'm Christy Nome here in Texas with my boots on the ground after this devastating tragedy that was absolutely not preventable and we are in no way responsible for it after visiting here I recently found out that Habius Corpus is the name of a city here in Texas and is in fact not a legal term which means the president can do whatever he wants. I have been told by some people that in addition to being the Secretary of Homeland Security that does also make me the head of Fema Fema sounds like female or feminism and that's DEI and 00:34 I don't believe in that. President Trump has entrusted me to be in charge of Fema which is not a federal emergency management agency. In fact, all emergencies are actually being managed by the state and the reason why I am here is to make sure to get some good film for my B roll. It is completely disgusting that there are people out there who are trying to politicize the devastation that happened here in Texas and I would like to remind everyone that it is only okay to politicize natural disasters when they happen in 01:04 blue states.

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Go to hell.’ Will Cain unloads on Joy Reid after she claims Trump voters would let him drown in a Texas river
True

Fact Check: Go to hell.’ Will Cain unloads on Joy Reid after she claims Trump voters would let him drown in a Texas river

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Go to hell.’ Will Cain unloads on Joy Reid after she claims Trump voters would let him drown in a Texas river

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: US Resumes AI Chip Sales After China Eases Rare Earth Controls; Trump Unveils Billions in AI Investment, ‘Fighting’ China
True

Fact Check: US Resumes AI Chip Sales After China Eases Rare Earth Controls; Trump Unveils Billions in AI Investment, ‘Fighting’ China

Detailed fact-check analysis of: US Resumes AI Chip Sales After China Eases Rare Earth Controls; Trump Unveils Billions in AI Investment, ‘Fighting’ China

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Hunter DID make millions from Even after Biden China & Ukraine denied it in the debate

he did make a
fortune from China. 4 million in
income in 2017 and 2. 2 million
in income in twenty eighteen.
Most of which came from Chinese
or Ukrainian interests. But and
this directly goes against what
Joe Biden said in the debate in
2020 with Donald Trump
True

Fact Check: Hunter DID make millions from Even after Biden China & Ukraine denied it in the debate he did make a fortune from China. 4 million in income in 2017 and 2. 2 million in income in twenty eighteen. Most of which came from Chinese or Ukrainian interests. But and this directly goes against what Joe Biden said in the debate in 2020 with Donald Trump

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Hunter DID make millions from Even after Biden China & Ukraine denied it in the debate he did make a fortune from China. 4 million in income in 2017 and 2. 2 million in income in twenty eighteen. Most of which came from Chinese or Ukrainian interests. But and this directly goes against what Joe Biden said in the debate in 2020 with Donald Trump

Jul 22, 2025
Read more →