Fact Check: Judge ruled Trump's tariffs unlawful under emergency powers law.

Fact Check: Judge ruled Trump's tariffs unlawful under emergency powers law.

Published June 18, 2025
by TruthOrFake AI
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: Judge Ruled Trump's Tariffs Unlawful Under Emergency Powers Law ## What We Know A recent ruling by the U.S. Court of International Trad...

Fact Check: Judge Ruled Trump's Tariffs Unlawful Under Emergency Powers Law

What We Know

A recent ruling by the U.S. Court of International Trade determined that President Trump's tariffs, imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), were unlawful. The court stated that the IEEPA does not grant the president "unbounded" authority to impose tariffs, emphasizing that the power to levy tariffs is constitutionally allocated to Congress (NPR). This ruling was made by a three-judge panel and has been described as surprising by many observers (Reuters).

However, the ruling was temporarily stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, allowing the tariffs to remain in place while the legal proceedings continue (NPR). The court's decision has sparked a significant legal battle regarding the extent of presidential powers in imposing tariffs during national emergencies.

Analysis

The ruling from the U.S. Court of International Trade is significant as it challenges the executive branch's interpretation of its powers under the IEEPA. The court's opinion highlighted that the tariffs imposed by Trump exceeded the authority granted to him under this act, which is intended to address threats during national emergencies (AP News). The judges noted that the Constitution explicitly allocates tariff powers to Congress, thus limiting the president's authority in this area (NPR).

While the ruling has been widely reported, it is essential to consider the context of the ongoing legal proceedings. The stay issued by the appellate court means that, for now, the tariffs remain in effect, and the final outcome of the legal challenges is still uncertain (Reuters). This situation illustrates the complexities of the legal system and the potential for further appeals, which could ultimately lead to a Supreme Court decision.

The sources used in this analysis are credible, including major news outlets such as NPR and Reuters, which provide thorough coverage of legal matters. However, the evolving nature of the case means that the information may change as new developments arise.

Conclusion

The claim that a judge ruled Trump's tariffs unlawful under emergency powers law is Partially True. While the U.S. Court of International Trade did rule that the tariffs were unlawful, the ruling has been stayed pending further legal proceedings, meaning the tariffs remain in effect for the time being. This nuance is critical in understanding the current legal landscape surrounding the tariffs.

Sources

  1. PLASTIC SERVICES AND PRODUCTS, LLC d/b/a GENO
  2. Federal court keeps Trump tariffs in place — for now : NPR
  3. Trump's tariffs to remain in effect after appeals court grants ...
  4. Federal trade court blocks Trump's sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs ...
  5. Court blocks Trump from imposing tariffs under emergency powers law ...
  6. Businesses challenge Trump's tariffs before Supreme Court

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Federal judge ruled Trump tariffs unlawful, but they're still in effect!
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Federal judge ruled Trump tariffs unlawful, but they're still in effect!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Federal judge ruled Trump tariffs unlawful, but they're still in effect!

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In April 2025, District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ruled against several parts of Trump’s anti-voting order, stating it vastly exceeded the scope of the president’s constitutional powers.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: In April 2025, District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ruled against several parts of Trump’s anti-voting order, stating it vastly exceeded the scope of the president’s constitutional powers.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In April 2025, District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ruled against several parts of Trump’s anti-voting order, stating it vastly exceeded the scope of the president’s constitutional powers.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: A judge appointed by Ronald Reagan ruled that President Trump's cuts to diversity, equity, and inclusion-related research grants at the National Institutes of Health were illegal and discriminatory.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: A judge appointed by Ronald Reagan ruled that President Trump's cuts to diversity, equity, and inclusion-related research grants at the National Institutes of Health were illegal and discriminatory.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: A judge appointed by Ronald Reagan ruled that President Trump's cuts to diversity, equity, and inclusion-related research grants at the National Institutes of Health were illegal and discriminatory.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: U.S. District Judge William Young ruled on October 23, 2023, that the Trump administration's termination of National Institutes of Health grants for diversity-related research was 'void and illegal' and constituted discrimination against racial minorities and LGBTQ individuals.
True

Fact Check: U.S. District Judge William Young ruled on October 23, 2023, that the Trump administration's termination of National Institutes of Health grants for diversity-related research was 'void and illegal' and constituted discrimination against racial minorities and LGBTQ individuals.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: U.S. District Judge William Young ruled on October 23, 2023, that the Trump administration's termination of National Institutes of Health grants for diversity-related research was 'void and illegal' and constituted discrimination against racial minorities and LGBTQ individuals.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: A federal judge ruled on a Monday in 2023 that some of the Trump administration’s grant terminations are 'void and illegal.'
True

Fact Check: A federal judge ruled on a Monday in 2023 that some of the Trump administration’s grant terminations are 'void and illegal.'

Detailed fact-check analysis of: A federal judge ruled on a Monday in 2023 that some of the Trump administration’s grant terminations are 'void and illegal.'

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: District Judge Denise Casper ruled that Trump's attempts to require proof of citizenship on a federal registration form and to prevent states from counting mail ballots received after Election Day would unduly burden states.
True

Fact Check: District Judge Denise Casper ruled that Trump's attempts to require proof of citizenship on a federal registration form and to prevent states from counting mail ballots received after Election Day would unduly burden states.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: District Judge Denise Casper ruled that Trump's attempts to require proof of citizenship on a federal registration form and to prevent states from counting mail ballots received after Election Day would unduly burden states.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →