Fact Check: Judge Denise Casper stated that Trump's order could disproportionately disenfranchise Black and poorer Americans by forcing them to obtain citizenship documents.

Fact Check: "Judge Denise Casper stated that Trump's order could disproportionately disenfranchise Black and poorer Americans by forcing them to obtain citizenship documents."

What We Know

U.S. District Court Judge Denise Casper recently ruled against provisions of President Trump's executive order that required voters to provide proof of citizenship when registering to vote. In her ruling, she noted that the requirement for citizenship documents could impose significant financial burdens, stating, "Citizenship documents are also expensive," and provided examples of costs associated with obtaining such documents, including up to $165 for a passport and $22 for a birth certificate in Rhode Island (NPR, Democracy Docket). Judge Casper concluded that the burden imposed by the executive order "appears likely to disproportionately disenfranchise Black and poorer Americans" (River City Omaha).

Analysis

The claim that Judge Casper stated Trump's order could disproportionately disenfranchise Black and poorer Americans is supported by her explicit remarks in the ruling. The judge's assessment of the financial implications of obtaining citizenship documents highlights a critical concern regarding access to voting for marginalized communities. The sources reporting on this ruling, including NPR and Democracy Docket, are credible and provide detailed accounts of the legal proceedings and the judge's reasoning.

NPR, a well-respected news organization, provides a thorough analysis of the case and the implications of the ruling, emphasizing the constitutional aspects of election management (NPR). Similarly, Democracy Docket, which focuses on voting rights and election law, corroborates Judge Casper's findings and emphasizes the potential risks of disenfranchisement (Democracy Docket).

In contrast, sources that may present a more partisan perspective, such as The Federalist, focus on the political implications of the ruling rather than the substantive legal arguments (The Federalist). This highlights the importance of considering the reliability and potential bias of sources when evaluating claims.

Conclusion

The claim that Judge Denise Casper stated that Trump's order could disproportionately disenfranchise Black and poorer Americans is True. The judge's ruling explicitly addresses the financial burdens associated with obtaining citizenship documents and concludes that these burdens could lead to disenfranchisement among vulnerable populations. The evidence from multiple credible sources supports this conclusion.

Sources

1. Judge Blocks Trump Voting Order Requiring Proof of Citizenship
2. A 2nd judge halts more of Trump's voting executive order - NPR
3. Judge temporarily blocks Trump's executive order redefining birthright ...
4. Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Anti-Voting Decree, Says it Would Likely ...
5. A judge has blocked Trump's order to require proof of citizenship for ...
6. Judge blocks Trump's election executive order, siding with ...
7. Dems Find Judge To Block More Of Trump's Election Law ...
8. A Second Federal Judge Blocks Parts of Trump's Executive Order on ...