Fact Check: Is Sweden safe?

Fact Check: Is Sweden safe?

Published June 30, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Is Sweden Safe? A Detailed Examination of the Claim ## Introduction The claim "Is Sweden safe?" raises questions about the overall safety of the co...

Is Sweden Safe? A Detailed Examination of the Claim

Introduction

The claim "Is Sweden safe?" raises questions about the overall safety of the country, particularly in relation to crime rates, including violent crime and gang-related incidents. This inquiry is particularly relevant given recent discussions around crime trends in Sweden, including reports of both declining homicide rates and increasing gang violence. This article aims to explore the available evidence regarding safety in Sweden without reaching a definitive conclusion.

What We Know

  1. Homicide Rates: According to a report by Reuters, Sweden recorded its lowest number of homicides in a decade in 2024, with 92 cases of deadly violence, which is a decrease from 121 in 2023 and the lowest since 2014 when 87 people were killed [1].

  2. Gang Violence: Conversely, the European Parliament has noted a significant increase in gang-related violence, with approximately 30 gang-related explosions reported in January 2025 alone, often occurring in residential areas [3].

  3. Crime Statistics: Data from the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (Brå) indicates that while the homicide rate has seen fluctuations, it remains higher than that of many other EU countries [6].

  4. Crime Index Rankings: According to Numbeo, Sweden's Crime Index was reported to be 48.1 in mid-2025, placing it relatively high compared to other countries, which suggests a moderate level of crime [7].

  5. Overall Crime Trends: Statista reports that the total number of reported crimes in Sweden has decreased since 2020, with a notable drop of over 100,000 reported crimes until 2022 [8]. However, this trend does not necessarily correlate with perceptions of safety, particularly in urban areas where gang violence has been reported.

Analysis

The evidence surrounding the claim of Sweden's safety presents a complex picture.

  • Homicide Rates: The decline in homicide rates reported by Reuters is a significant indicator of safety. However, it is essential to consider the broader context of violent crime, as the decrease in homicides does not encompass other forms of violence, particularly gang-related incidents.

  • Gang Violence: The reports of increasing gang violence, including explosions and shootings, raise concerns about safety in certain areas. The European Parliament's acknowledgment of this issue suggests a growing recognition of the problem, which may not be fully reflected in overall homicide statistics. This discrepancy highlights the need for a nuanced understanding of crime beyond just homicide rates.

  • Source Reliability: The sources cited vary in reliability. Reuters is a well-established news organization known for its fact-checking and journalistic integrity, making its report on homicide rates credible [1]. The European Parliament's report also carries weight due to its official nature, although it may have a vested interest in discussing crime to promote legislative action [3]. In contrast, sources like Numbeo, while useful for comparative statistics, may not always provide the same level of rigor in data collection and analysis [7].

  • Methodological Concerns: The methodologies used to compile crime statistics can vary significantly. For instance, Brå's statistics are based on reported crimes, which may not capture the full scope of unreported incidents, particularly in communities affected by gang violence [6]. Additionally, the reliance on self-reported data in some indices may introduce bias.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim regarding Sweden's safety is partially true, as the evidence presents a mixed picture. On one hand, the reported decline in homicide rates suggests an improvement in safety. However, this positive trend is countered by a significant rise in gang-related violence, which poses serious safety concerns in certain areas. The complexity of crime statistics and the variability in reporting methods further complicate the assessment of overall safety.

It is important to note that while homicide rates may be declining, they do not fully capture the broader spectrum of violent crime, particularly gang-related incidents that are increasing. This discrepancy indicates that while some aspects of safety may be improving, others are deteriorating, leading to a nuanced understanding of the situation.

Limitations in the available evidence include potential biases in self-reported data and the reliance on reported crimes, which may not reflect the true extent of violence in affected communities.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider multiple sources when assessing claims about safety in Sweden or any other context.

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Is Anadius safe?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is Anadius safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Anadius safe?

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Deep state is Sweden
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Deep state is Sweden

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Deep state is Sweden

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Sweden was active with hitler
Partially True

Fact Check: Sweden was active with hitler

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Sweden was active with hitler

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Sweden bans porn
Partially True

Fact Check: Sweden bans porn

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Sweden bans porn

Jul 9, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Sweden had banned Onlyfans website
Partially True

Fact Check: Sweden had banned Onlyfans website

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Sweden had banned Onlyfans website

Jul 9, 2025
Read more →