Fact Check: In May the Supreme Court upheld his suspension of the humanitarian parole programme while a legal battle continues in lower courts.

Fact Check: "In May the Supreme Court upheld his suspension of the humanitarian parole programme while a legal battle continues in lower courts."

What We Know

In May 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court lifted a federal district court order that had maintained humanitarian parole protections for over 500,000 migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. This decision allowed the Trump administration to proceed with terminating the humanitarian parole program while a legal battle continues in lower courts (AP News, NPR). The court's ruling means that these migrants could potentially face deportation as their temporary legal status is revoked (Reuters).

The humanitarian parole program, known as CHNV, was designed to provide temporary legal status to individuals fleeing dangerous conditions in their home countries. The Supreme Court's decision to lift the injunction was made without a detailed explanation, which is typical for emergency orders (NPR).

Analysis

The claim that the Supreme Court upheld the suspension of the humanitarian parole program is accurate. The court's ruling effectively allows the Trump administration to revoke protections for migrants while the case is being reviewed in lower courts. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in her dissent, criticized the majority for causing "irreparable harm" to nearly half a million noncitizens (AP News, NPR).

The sources used in this analysis are credible and provide a comprehensive overview of the Supreme Court's decision and its implications. The Associated Press, NPR, and Reuters are established news organizations known for their journalistic integrity. They report on legal matters with a focus on factual accuracy, making them reliable sources for this type of information.

However, it is important to note that the Supreme Court's order is not a final ruling on the legality of the program itself; it merely allows the administration to proceed with its actions while the legal challenges are ongoing (SCOTUSblog). This distinction is crucial in understanding the temporary nature of the ruling and its implications for the affected migrants.

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim that the Supreme Court upheld the suspension of the humanitarian parole program while a legal battle continues in lower courts is accurate. The court's decision allows the Trump administration to revoke temporary legal protections for hundreds of thousands of migrants, exposing them to potential deportation. This ruling is significant as it affects the lives of many individuals who relied on the program for safety and stability while their legal claims are adjudicated.

Fact Check: In May the Supreme Court upheld his suspension of the humanitarian parole programme while a legal battle continues in lower courts.