Fact Check: In May the Supreme Court upheld his suspension of the humanitarian parole programme while a legal battle continues in lower courts.

Fact Check: "In May the Supreme Court upheld his suspension of the humanitarian parole programme while a legal battle continues in lower courts."

What We Know

In May 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling that allowed the Trump administration to temporarily suspend the humanitarian parole program known as CHNV (Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela) which had provided legal protections to nearly 500,000 migrants from these countries. This decision lifted a lower court's order that had kept these protections in place, effectively exposing these migrants to potential deportation while the case continues in lower courts (AP News, NPR).

The Supreme Court's order did not provide detailed reasoning, which is typical for emergency docket decisions. However, it effectively means that the protections will not be in place during the ongoing legal battle (Reuters). The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) argued that the humanitarian protections were always intended to be temporary and that the agency has the authority to revoke them without judicial interference (AP News).

Analysis

The claim that the Supreme Court upheld the suspension of the humanitarian parole program is accurate. The court's decision to lift the lower court's injunction allows the Trump administration to proceed with terminating the CHNV program, which has been described as the largest mass deportation event in modern U.S. history (NPR).

Critically, the dissenting opinions from Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor highlighted the potential for "irreparable harm" to the affected migrants, emphasizing the devastating consequences of the court's ruling. Justice Jackson criticized the majority for not adequately considering the lives and livelihoods of those impacted (NPR).

The sources utilized in this analysis are credible and include major news organizations such as the Associated Press, NPR, and Reuters, which have a history of reliable reporting on legal and immigration issues. The dissenting opinions from the Supreme Court justices provide additional context and underscore the contentious nature of the ruling.

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim that the Supreme Court upheld the suspension of the humanitarian parole program while a legal battle continues in lower courts is true. The court's decision allows the Trump administration to revoke protections for nearly half a million migrants, which has significant implications for their legal status and potential deportation.

Fact Check: In May the Supreme Court upheld his suspension of the humanitarian parole programme while a legal battle continues in lower courts.