Fact Check: In May the Supreme Court upheld his suspension of the humanitarian parole programme while a legal battle continues in lower courts.

Fact Check: "In May the Supreme Court upheld his suspension of the humanitarian parole programme while a legal battle continues in lower courts."

What We Know

In May 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling that allowed the Trump administration to temporarily pause the humanitarian parole program known as CHNV, which had provided legal protections to nearly half a million migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. This ruling means that individuals who had been granted temporary parole under this program could lose their legal status and face potential deportation while the case continues to be litigated in lower courts (NPR, AP News).

The Supreme Court's decision came after a federal district court had ruled in favor of the migrants, stating that the termination of the program was premature and violated statutory requirements for case-by-case evaluations of parole eligibility (Reuters). The Supreme Court did not provide a detailed explanation for its ruling, which is typical for emergency orders (AP News).

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in her dissent, emphasized the severe consequences of the ruling, arguing that it would cause irreparable harm to the lives of the affected migrants (NPR).

Analysis

The claim that the Supreme Court upheld the suspension of the humanitarian parole program is accurate based on multiple reliable sources. The Supreme Court's ruling effectively lifted a lower court's injunction that had protected the status of the migrants under the CHNV program (NPR, AP News).

The sources used in this analysis are credible and come from established news organizations such as NPR, AP News, and Reuters, which are known for their journalistic integrity and fact-checking standards. The dissenting opinion from Justice Jackson, which is cited in several reports, adds a critical legal perspective to the ruling, highlighting the potential human impact of the court's decision (NPR, AP News).

While the Trump administration's argument for terminating the program was based on the assertion that the protections were meant to be temporary and that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had the authority to revoke them without court interference, the dissenting opinions raise significant concerns about the implications of such actions on vulnerable populations (Reuters, AP News).

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim that "In May the Supreme Court upheld his suspension of the humanitarian parole programme while a legal battle continues in lower courts" is true. The Supreme Court's ruling allowed the Trump administration to pause the CHNV humanitarian parole program, exposing hundreds of thousands of migrants to potential deportation while the legal battle continues.

Fact Check: In May the Supreme Court upheld his suspension of the humanitarian parole programme while a legal battle continues in lower courts.