Fact Check: In late May, a federal judge in Vermont ordered her release from immigration custody citing concerns about the legal basis for her visa revocation and extended detention.

Fact Check: In late May, a federal judge in Vermont ordered her release from immigration custody citing concerns about the legal basis for her visa revocation and extended detention.

Published June 13, 2025
by TruthOrFake AI
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "In late May, a federal judge in Vermont ordered her release from immigration custody citing concerns about the legal basis for her visa...

Fact Check: "In late May, a federal judge in Vermont ordered her release from immigration custody citing concerns about the legal basis for her visa revocation and extended detention."

What We Know

In late May 2025, U.S. District Court Judge William K. Sessions III ordered the release of Rümeysa Öztürk, a Turkish graduate student who had been in federal immigration custody for approximately six weeks. The judge's ruling followed a three-hour hearing where Öztürk participated remotely from a detention center in Louisiana. The judge expressed concerns regarding the legal basis for her visa revocation, stating that the government had not provided sufficient evidence beyond her political opinions expressed in an op-ed to justify her detention (VTDigger). Sessions highlighted that Öztürk's detention could infringe upon her First Amendment rights and noted the adverse effects on her health due to her worsening asthma condition while in custody (VTDigger).

Analysis

The evidence presented during the hearing indicated that Öztürk's detention was not only a potential violation of her rights but also detrimental to her health. Judge Sessions remarked on the lack of substantial evidence from the government to justify her arrest, which had been primarily based on her political speech regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict (VTDigger). This aligns with broader concerns about the chilling effect on free speech for non-citizens in the U.S.

The sources used in this fact-check are credible, particularly VTDigger, which is known for its thorough reporting on local issues, including immigration and legal matters. The judge's statements were reported directly from the court proceedings, ensuring accuracy in the representation of his concerns (VTDigger). Other sources, such as NBC News and CBS News, corroborate the timeline and details of the case, further establishing the reliability of the information (NBC News, CBS News).

Conclusion

The claim that a federal judge in Vermont ordered Rümeysa Öztürk's release from immigration custody due to concerns about the legal basis for her visa revocation and extended detention is True. The evidence presented during the court proceedings, as well as the judge's remarks regarding the implications for free speech and Öztürk's health, support this conclusion.

Sources

  1. Vermont federal judge orders Rümeysa Öztürk to be released from custody
  2. Federal government appeals judge's order to move detained Tufts student
  3. Judge rejects federal government’s attempt to halt detained Tufts student’s return to Vermont

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Judge William Young stated that the NIH violated federal law by arbitrarily canceling more than $1 billion in research grants due to their perceived connection to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Judge William Young stated that the NIH violated federal law by arbitrarily canceling more than $1 billion in research grants due to their perceived connection to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Judge William Young stated that the NIH violated federal law by arbitrarily canceling more than $1 billion in research grants due to their perceived connection to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Education Secretary claims New York violated federal anti-discrimination law.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Education Secretary claims New York violated federal anti-discrimination law.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Education Secretary claims New York violated federal anti-discrimination law.

Jun 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: A judge appointed by Ronald Reagan ruled that President Trump's cuts to diversity, equity, and inclusion-related research grants at the National Institutes of Health were illegal and discriminatory.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: A judge appointed by Ronald Reagan ruled that President Trump's cuts to diversity, equity, and inclusion-related research grants at the National Institutes of Health were illegal and discriminatory.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: A judge appointed by Ronald Reagan ruled that President Trump's cuts to diversity, equity, and inclusion-related research grants at the National Institutes of Health were illegal and discriminatory.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Iowa Senator Joni Ernst made a controversial remark during a town hall in late May 2023, stating, 'Well, we all are going to die,' in response to a constituent's concern that the Trump-backed budget bill would kick an estimated 5.4 million people off Medicaid.
True

Fact Check: Iowa Senator Joni Ernst made a controversial remark during a town hall in late May 2023, stating, 'Well, we all are going to die,' in response to a constituent's concern that the Trump-backed budget bill would kick an estimated 5.4 million people off Medicaid.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Iowa Senator Joni Ernst made a controversial remark during a town hall in late May 2023, stating, 'Well, we all are going to die,' in response to a constituent's concern that the Trump-backed budget bill would kick an estimated 5.4 million people off Medicaid.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: U.S. District Judge William Young ruled on October 23, 2023, that the Trump administration's termination of National Institutes of Health grants for diversity-related research was 'void and illegal' and constituted discrimination against racial minorities and LGBTQ individuals.
True

Fact Check: U.S. District Judge William Young ruled on October 23, 2023, that the Trump administration's termination of National Institutes of Health grants for diversity-related research was 'void and illegal' and constituted discrimination against racial minorities and LGBTQ individuals.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: U.S. District Judge William Young ruled on October 23, 2023, that the Trump administration's termination of National Institutes of Health grants for diversity-related research was 'void and illegal' and constituted discrimination against racial minorities and LGBTQ individuals.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Support for Donald Trump's immigration policy has weakened according to the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll.
True

Fact Check: Support for Donald Trump's immigration policy has weakened according to the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Support for Donald Trump's immigration policy has weakened according to the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In late May, a federal judge in Vermont ordered her release from immigration custody citing concerns about the legal basis for her visa revocation and extended detention. | TruthOrFake Blog