Fact Check: In 2021, Kim Jong Un reminded North Korean women to 'support their husbands and dedicate themselves to raising their children as socialist warriors.'

Fact Check: In 2021, Kim Jong Un reminded North Korean women to 'support their husbands and dedicate themselves to raising their children as socialist warriors.'

Published June 16, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "In 2021, Kim Jong Un reminded North Korean women to 'support their husbands and dedicate themselves to raising their children as social...

Fact Check: "In 2021, Kim Jong Un reminded North Korean women to 'support their husbands and dedicate themselves to raising their children as socialist warriors.'"

What We Know

In December 2023, Kim Jong Un made a notable speech urging North Korean women to have more children to combat declining birth rates. He emphasized that raising children should be a collective effort, stating, “Stopping the decline in birth rates and providing good child care and education are all our family affairs that we should solve together with our mothers” (source-2). This speech aligns with North Korea's ongoing propaganda efforts that encourage women to contribute to the state's goals, including the upbringing of children who will support the socialist regime (source-1).

Kim's remarks reflect a broader theme in North Korean propaganda, where women are often portrayed as essential to the state's future. The regime has historically emphasized the importance of women's roles in raising children who will become "socialist warriors" (source-4). This narrative is consistent with the country's efforts to bolster its population and military strength, as declining birth rates pose a significant challenge to North Korea's demographic stability (source-3).

Analysis

The claim that Kim Jong Un reminded North Korean women to "support their husbands and dedicate themselves to raising their children as socialist warriors" is partially true. While there is no direct quote from Kim using the exact phrasing in the claim, the essence of his message aligns closely with it. He did indeed urge women to prioritize child-rearing in a manner that supports the socialist state (source-7).

The reliability of the sources varies. The New York Post and The Times of India provide coverage of Kim's speech, highlighting his emotional appeal to women regarding child-rearing (source-2, source-3). However, these outlets may carry a degree of sensationalism. On the other hand, North Korean state media and specialized news outlets like NK News provide a more direct account of the speech and its context, although they may also be influenced by the regime's propaganda (source-4).

Overall, while the claim captures the spirit of Kim's message, it does not quote him directly, which complicates a straightforward verification.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True
The claim that Kim Jong Un reminded North Korean women to "support their husbands and dedicate themselves to raising their children as socialist warriors" is partially true. While Kim did emphasize the importance of women in raising children for the socialist state, the specific wording of the claim is not directly supported by his speeches. However, the underlying message aligns with North Korea's propaganda themes, making the claim credible in its essence.

Sources

  1. List of North Korean propaganda slogans
  2. Kim Jong Un tearfully begs North Korean women to have more children
  3. Kim Jong Un weeps as he urges North Korean women to have more children
  4. Kim Jong Un lectures moms on 'growing' issue of errant youth and falling birth rate
  5. Women have become more powerful to make money. I ...
  6. For International Women's Day, North Korean women urged to bear more children
  7. North Korea's Kim Jong Un urges women to have more children
  8. Kim Jong Un urges women to be good comrades

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Kim Jong-un declared inter-Korean relations as hostile in late 2023.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Kim Jong-un declared inter-Korean relations as hostile in late 2023.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Kim Jong-un declared inter-Korean relations as hostile in late 2023.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Kim Jong-un declared inter-Korean relations as hostile in late 2023
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Kim Jong-un declared inter-Korean relations as hostile in late 2023

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Kim Jong-un declared inter-Korean relations as hostile in late 2023

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Kim Jong Un ordered a crackdown on 'anti-party' elements in March and April.
True

Fact Check: Kim Jong Un ordered a crackdown on 'anti-party' elements in March and April.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Kim Jong Un ordered a crackdown on 'anti-party' elements in March and April.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In 2021, U.S. agents requested to review bank accounts held by Salvadoran political figures to investigate the suspected diversion of U.S. aid funds to MS-13.
Partially True

Fact Check: In 2021, U.S. agents requested to review bank accounts held by Salvadoran political figures to investigate the suspected diversion of U.S. aid funds to MS-13.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In 2021, U.S. agents requested to review bank accounts held by Salvadoran political figures to investigate the suspected diversion of U.S. aid funds to MS-13.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Norwegian government statements indicate that only combat-ready fighters, decommissioned in 2021, would be transferred.
Partially True

Fact Check: Norwegian government statements indicate that only combat-ready fighters, decommissioned in 2021, would be transferred.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Norwegian government statements indicate that only combat-ready fighters, decommissioned in 2021, would be transferred.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →