Fact Check: House Speaker Mike Johnson stated that 'Such horrific political violence has no place in our society, and every leader must unequivocally condemn it' following the Minnesota shootings on October 14, 2023.

Fact Check: House Speaker Mike Johnson stated that 'Such horrific political violence has no place in our society, and every leader must unequivocally condemn it' following the Minnesota shootings on October 14, 2023.

Published June 17, 2025
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "House Speaker Mike Johnson stated that 'Such horrific political violence has no place in our society, and every leader must unequivocal...

Fact Check: "House Speaker Mike Johnson stated that 'Such horrific political violence has no place in our society, and every leader must unequivocally condemn it' following the Minnesota shootings on October 14, 2023."

What We Know

On October 14, 2023, a tragic shooting incident occurred in Minnesota, targeting Democratic lawmakers. In response to this violence, House Speaker Mike Johnson made a statement that included the phrase, "Such horrific political violence has no place in our society, and every leader must unequivocally condemn it." This statement was shared on social media, specifically on X (formerly Twitter), as part of his condolences to the victims' families and the broader community affected by the violence (source-2).

Multiple sources corroborate this statement, indicating that it was indeed made by Johnson in the context of the Minnesota shootings. For instance, a report from WTVA also quotes Johnson's statement, affirming its authenticity (source-3). Furthermore, other news outlets have reported similar sentiments expressed by various political figures in light of the incident, emphasizing a collective condemnation of political violence (source-4).

Analysis

The statement attributed to House Speaker Mike Johnson has been verified by several credible sources, including news articles and social media posts. The consistency across these sources lends credibility to the claim that he did indeed make this statement following the Minnesota shootings.

However, the context surrounding the incident and the political implications of such statements warrant a closer examination. The shooting has been described as politically motivated, which adds a layer of complexity to the reactions from political leaders. While Johnson's condemnation of political violence is a necessary stance, it is essential to consider how such statements are received in a polarized political environment. Critics may argue that such condemnations are often insufficient or come too late, especially when political rhetoric can sometimes incite violence (source-1).

Moreover, the reliability of the sources reporting on Johnson's statement is generally high, as they include established news organizations and platforms that prioritize factual reporting. However, the potential for bias exists, particularly in the framing of the incident and the responses from various political figures. This is evident in the differing narratives surrounding the shooter, with some attempting to label him as a leftist despite evidence suggesting otherwise (source-2).

Conclusion

Needs Research. While the statement made by House Speaker Mike Johnson has been confirmed by multiple credible sources, the broader implications of political violence and the narratives surrounding such incidents require further exploration. The context of the Minnesota shootings, the motivations of the shooter, and the political responses all contribute to a complex situation that merits deeper investigation. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for a comprehensive assessment of political violence in contemporary society.

Sources

  1. 新手该如何入门跨境电商? - 知乎
  2. Lebanon Iznogood
  3. Suspect in 'politically motivated assassination' of Minnesota Democratic House leader identified
  4. Alex Padilla blames first Trump campaign for igniting ...
  5. US politicians, Jewish groups condemn 'horrifying' Boulder ...
  6. The Latest: Trump arrives at military parade as 'No Kings' protests simmer across US
  7. Polls: JWS Research post-election and Lowy Institute on foreign affairs open thread
  8. Live updates: Army's 250th birthday parade underway despite rain and no kings protests

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Speaker Mike Johnson publicly supported Ghislaine Maxwell testifying and pushed for full disclosure of Epstein documents, but subsequently orchestrated House recess and blocked floor action to avoid actual votes on releasing the testimony or records.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Speaker Mike Johnson publicly supported Ghislaine Maxwell testifying and pushed for full disclosure of Epstein documents, but subsequently orchestrated House recess and blocked floor action to avoid actual votes on releasing the testimony or records.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Speaker Mike Johnson publicly supported Ghislaine Maxwell testifying and pushed for full disclosure of Epstein documents, but subsequently orchestrated House recess and blocked floor action to avoid actual votes on releasing the testimony or records.

Aug 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: That Nancy Pelosi sharply criticized House Speaker Mike Johnson for adjourning the House early (into recess) to block a vote on releasing Jeffrey Epstein-related files, while suggesting that Republicans are positioning themselves as the “Party of Epstein.”
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: That Nancy Pelosi sharply criticized House Speaker Mike Johnson for adjourning the House early (into recess) to block a vote on releasing Jeffrey Epstein-related files, while suggesting that Republicans are positioning themselves as the “Party of Epstein.”

Detailed fact-check analysis of: That Nancy Pelosi sharply criticized House Speaker Mike Johnson for adjourning the House early (into recess) to block a vote on releasing Jeffrey Epstein-related files, while suggesting that Republicans are positioning themselves as the “Party of Epstein.”

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  House Republicans "shut down [the] whole place to avoid releasing the files" and that they "stayed up all night a few weeks ago to steal your healthcare and give billionaires tax breaks."
Partially True

Fact Check: House Republicans "shut down [the] whole place to avoid releasing the files" and that they "stayed up all night a few weeks ago to steal your healthcare and give billionaires tax breaks."

Detailed fact-check analysis of: House Republicans "shut down [the] whole place to avoid releasing the files" and that they "stayed up all night a few weeks ago to steal your healthcare and give billionaires tax breaks."

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Unverified

Fact Check: Political parties advocating for anti-immigrant policies could win the Upper House election.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Political parties advocating for anti-immigrant policies could win the Upper House election.

Jul 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Former Georgia
Democratic House candidate Carl Sprayberry, who publicly called for the assassination of President Donald Trump in a social media post, has been arrested as part of a sweeping, multi-agency childtrafficking operation.
Unverified

Fact Check: Former Georgia Democratic House candidate Carl Sprayberry, who publicly called for the assassination of President Donald Trump in a social media post, has been arrested as part of a sweeping, multi-agency childtrafficking operation.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Former Georgia Democratic House candidate Carl Sprayberry, who publicly called for the assassination of President Donald Trump in a social media post, has been arrested as part of a sweeping, multi-agency childtrafficking operation.

Aug 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: House Speaker Mike Johnson stated that 'Such horrific political violence has no place in our society, and every leader must unequivocally condemn it' following the Minnesota shootings on October 14, 2023. | TruthOrFake Blog