Fact Check: Governor Newsom's power to block Trump’s National Guard order deemed ineffective!

Fact Check: Governor Newsom's Power to Block Trump’s National Guard Order Deemed Ineffective!

What We Know

The claim revolves around a recent ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which allowed President Trump to retain control over the California National Guard, despite Governor Gavin Newsom's objections. The court's decision came after a lower court had ruled that Trump's actions to federalize the National Guard were illegal and ordered the troops to be returned to state control (Governor Newsom vows to keep fighting as federal court rejects Trump's ...). The Ninth Circuit's ruling effectively stayed this order, meaning that for the time being, the National Guard remains under federal control.

Governor Newsom expressed disappointment over this decision but highlighted that the Ninth Circuit rejected Trump's broader claims of unilateral authority to federalize the National Guard without judicial oversight (Governor Newsom prevails in blocking Trump's militarization ...). This ruling has been described as a critical check on presidential overreach, affirming that the President is not above the law (What's Next for Trump and the National Guard in California After Court ...).

Analysis

The ruling from the Ninth Circuit is significant as it indicates a complex legal battle over the powers of state versus federal authority regarding the National Guard. The lower court's decision by Judge Breyer had found that Trump's actions violated federal statutes and the Tenth Amendment, which reserves certain powers to the states (What's Next for Trump and the National Guard in California After Court ...). However, the appeals court's stay means that, at least temporarily, Trump's control over the National Guard remains intact, which can be interpreted as a setback for Newsom's efforts to reclaim authority.

Critically, while the Ninth Circuit's ruling does limit Trump's claims of absolute power, it does not fully grant Newsom the control he seeks. The appeals court's decision to stay the lower court's order suggests that the legal battle is ongoing and that the final outcome is still uncertain. This situation illustrates the tension between state and federal powers, particularly in matters of national security and law enforcement.

The sources used in this analysis are credible, including official statements from the California government and reputable news outlets like The New York Times and NBC News. However, the political context surrounding these events may introduce some bias, particularly in how different outlets frame the implications of the rulings (Court rules Trump can maintain National Guard despite Newsom's ..., Trump administration can keep control of California National Guard ...).

Conclusion

The claim that "Governor Newsom's power to block Trump’s National Guard order deemed ineffective" is Partially True. While the Ninth Circuit did allow Trump to maintain control over the National Guard for the time being, it also rejected his broader claims of authority to federalize the National Guard without accountability. This indicates that while Newsom's immediate efforts may have been stymied, the legal framework is still being contested, and the situation remains fluid.

Fact Check: Governor Newsom's power to block Trump’s National Guard order deemed ineffective!