Fact Check: E. Jean Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, stated on October 27, 2023, that Carroll is pleased with the appeals court's decision regarding Trump's liability for sexual assault and defamation.

Fact Check: E. Jean Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, stated on October 27, 2023, that Carroll is pleased with the appeals court's decision regarding Trump's liability for sexual assault and defamation.

June 14, 2025by TruthOrFake AI
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: E. Jean Carroll's Attorney Statement on Appeals Court Decision ## What We Know On October 27, 2023, a federal appeals court upheld a $5...

Fact Check: E. Jean Carroll's Attorney Statement on Appeals Court Decision

What We Know

On October 27, 2023, a federal appeals court upheld a $5 million civil judgment against former President Donald Trump in a case brought by E. Jean Carroll, who accused him of sexual assault and defamation. Following the court's decision, Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, stated that Carroll is "very pleased with today’s decision" and emphasized that Trump's attempts to challenge the findings of two separate juries have failed, affirming his liability for sexual assault and defamation (AP News, BBC). This ruling came after a jury found Trump liable for sexually abusing Carroll in a Manhattan department store in the mid-1990s and subsequently defaming her in 2022 (Wikipedia).

Analysis

The claim that Roberta Kaplan stated E. Jean Carroll is pleased with the appeals court's decision is supported by multiple credible sources. Both the Associated Press and BBC reported Kaplan's statement directly, confirming that she expressed Carroll's satisfaction with the court's ruling (AP News, BBC). The statements made by Kaplan are consistent with the context of the appeals court's decision, which rejected Trump's request for a rehearing of the case, thereby upholding the jury's verdict from the previous trial.

The sources used in this fact-check are reliable news organizations with a history of covering legal matters and political news. The Associated Press is a well-established wire service known for its factual reporting, while the BBC is a reputable international broadcaster. Both outlets provided direct quotes from Kaplan, which adds to the credibility of the claim.

Conclusion

Verdict: True. Roberta Kaplan did indeed state that E. Jean Carroll is pleased with the appeals court's decision regarding Trump's liability for sexual assault and defamation. The evidence from credible news sources confirms that Kaplan's statement accurately reflects Carroll's reaction to the court's ruling.

Sources

  1. Court rejects Trump's appeal in E. Jean Carroll sexual ...
  2. Trump loses bid for appeals court to reconsider $5m loss ...
  3. E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: E. Jean Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, stated on October 27, 2023, that Carroll is pleased with the appeals court's decision and that Trump's legal efforts have failed.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: E. Jean Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, stated on October 27, 2023, that Carroll is pleased with the appeals court's decision and that Trump's legal efforts have failed.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: E. Jean Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, stated on October 27, 2023, that Carroll is pleased with the appeals court's decision and that Trump's legal efforts have failed.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: E. Jean Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, stated on October 27, 2023, that Carroll is pleased with the appeals court decision and that Trump's efforts to challenge the findings of two juries have failed.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: E. Jean Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, stated on October 27, 2023, that Carroll is pleased with the appeals court decision and that Trump's efforts to challenge the findings of two juries have failed.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: E. Jean Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, stated on October 27, 2023, that Carroll is pleased with the appeals court decision and that Trump's efforts to challenge the findings of two juries have failed.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In a statement responding to Friday's decision, Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, said, 'E. Jean Carroll is very pleased with today’s decision.'
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: In a statement responding to Friday's decision, Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, said, 'E. Jean Carroll is very pleased with today’s decision.'

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In a statement responding to Friday's decision, Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, said, 'E. Jean Carroll is very pleased with today’s decision.'

Jun 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In 2023, a jury in Manhattan federal court found Donald Trump liable for battery and defamation against E. Jean Carroll.
True

Fact Check: In 2023, a jury in Manhattan federal court found Donald Trump liable for battery and defamation against E. Jean Carroll.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In 2023, a jury in Manhattan federal court found Donald Trump liable for battery and defamation against E. Jean Carroll.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In 2023, a jury in Manhattan federal court found Donald Trump liable for battery and defamation against E. Jean Carroll, stemming from an incident in the 1990s.
Partially True

Fact Check: In 2023, a jury in Manhattan federal court found Donald Trump liable for battery and defamation against E. Jean Carroll, stemming from an incident in the 1990s.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In 2023, a jury in Manhattan federal court found Donald Trump liable for battery and defamation against E. Jean Carroll, stemming from an incident in the 1990s.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Judge Steven Menashi, a Trump appointee, dissented in the appeals court decision, arguing that the district court should have allowed evidence regarding Trump's belief that Carroll's lawsuit was politically motivated.
Partially True

Fact Check: Judge Steven Menashi, a Trump appointee, dissented in the appeals court decision, arguing that the district court should have allowed evidence regarding Trump's belief that Carroll's lawsuit was politically motivated.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Judge Steven Menashi, a Trump appointee, dissented in the appeals court decision, arguing that the district court should have allowed evidence regarding Trump's belief that Carroll's lawsuit was politically motivated.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →