Fact Check: DOJ attorney fired for refusing to support false claims against Abrego Garcia.

Fact Check: DOJ attorney fired for refusing to support false claims against Abrego Garcia.

Published June 29, 2025
by TruthOrFake AI
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: DOJ Attorney Fired for Refusing to Support False Claims Against Abrego Garcia ## What We Know The claim states that Erez Reuveni, an at...

Fact Check: DOJ Attorney Fired for Refusing to Support False Claims Against Abrego Garcia

What We Know

The claim states that Erez Reuveni, an attorney with the Department of Justice (DOJ), was fired for refusing to support false claims regarding Kilmar Abrego Garcia's deportation. Reuveni represented the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in the case Abrego Garcia v. Noem, where he acknowledged in court that DHS's deportation of Garcia was an “administrative error” (Goodlander Demands Attorney General Bondi Reinstate...). Following this admission, he was placed on indefinite leave and subsequently fired, with officials citing his failure to follow directives from superiors (Goodlander Demands Attorney General Bondi Reinstate...).

During a court hearing on April 4, 2025, Reuveni stated, “We have nothing to say on the merits. We concede he should not have been removed to El Salvador,” and expressed frustration over the lack of satisfactory answers regarding Garcia's detention (Goodlander Demands Attorney General Bondi Reinstate...). His statements were consistent with a declaration from DHS acknowledging the wrongful deportation (Goodlander Demands Attorney General Bondi Reinstate...).

Analysis

The evidence surrounding Reuveni's firing suggests that it was directly linked to his candor in court, which contradicted the administration's narrative. Reuveni's statements in court were factual and aligned with the DHS's own admission of error, indicating that he acted in accordance with his professional ethical obligations (Goodlander Demands Attorney General Bondi Reinstate...).

The reliability of the sources is high, particularly the congressional letter led by Congressman Dan Goldman, which articulates concerns over the ethical implications of Reuveni's termination and emphasizes the importance of attorneys' duties to the court (Goodlander Demands Attorney General Bondi Reinstate...). Additionally, reports from NPR and other news outlets corroborate the narrative of Reuveni's firing being a consequence of his truthful representation in court (Fired Justice Department lawyer accuses agency of planning to defy..., Justice Department says Abrego Garcia will face US trial).

However, some sources, such as the New York Times, highlight the broader context of political motivations behind the DOJ's actions, suggesting a pattern of prioritizing political narratives over legal truths (Judge's Ruling Casts Doubt on Trump Administration's...). The potential bias in these sources must be considered, but the core facts regarding Reuveni's firing remain consistent across multiple reports.

Conclusion

The claim that Erez Reuveni was fired for refusing to support false claims against Kilmar Abrego Garcia is True. The evidence indicates that his termination was a direct result of his commitment to honesty in legal proceedings, which conflicted with the directives from his superiors. His statements in court were factual and aligned with the government's own acknowledgment of error, reinforcing the notion that he was unjustly penalized for adhering to his professional ethical obligations.

Sources

  1. Goodlander Demands Attorney General Bondi Reinstate...
  2. 24A949 Noem v. Abrego Garcia (04/10/2025)
  3. Fired Justice Department lawyer accuses agency of planning to defy...
  4. Justice Department says Abrego Garcia will face US trial
  5. Judge's Ruling Casts Doubt on Trump Administration's...
  6. Fired DOJ lawyer alleges senior Justice Department officials lied to...
  7. Trump's DOJ Told Lawyers To Disobey Court Orders, Alleges...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: DOJ attorney fired for refusing to support unsubstantiated claims against Abrego Garcia.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: DOJ attorney fired for refusing to support unsubstantiated claims against Abrego Garcia.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: DOJ attorney fired for refusing to support unsubstantiated claims against Abrego Garcia.

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Judge deems DOJ's accusations against Abrego Garcia as overblown and unreliable.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Judge deems DOJ's accusations against Abrego Garcia as overblown and unreliable.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Judge deems DOJ's accusations against Abrego Garcia as overblown and unreliable.

Jun 23, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Judge rules DOJ failed to prove Kilmar Abrego Garcia is a danger.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Judge rules DOJ failed to prove Kilmar Abrego Garcia is a danger.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Judge rules DOJ failed to prove Kilmar Abrego Garcia is a danger.

Jun 23, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The U.S. Attorney’s Office for D.C. and the DOJ’s Civil Rights Section jointly decided no criminal charges against the officer were warranted.
Needs Research

Fact Check: The U.S. Attorney’s Office for D.C. and the DOJ’s Civil Rights Section jointly decided no criminal charges against the officer were warranted.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The U.S. Attorney’s Office for D.C. and the DOJ’s Civil Rights Section jointly decided no criminal charges against the officer were warranted.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump's DOJ claims judicial review causes 'irreparable harm' to the government.
True

Fact Check: Trump's DOJ claims judicial review causes 'irreparable harm' to the government.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's DOJ claims judicial review causes 'irreparable harm' to the government.

Jun 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Whistleblower claims DOJ leadership violated court orders multiple times.
True

Fact Check: Whistleblower claims DOJ leadership violated court orders multiple times.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Whistleblower claims DOJ leadership violated court orders multiple times.

Jun 24, 2025
Read more →