TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: DOJ argues courts can't challenge president's National Guard mobilization decisions.

Fact Check: DOJ argues courts can't challenge president's National Guard mobilization decisions.

Published June 18, 2025
by TruthOrFake AI
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: DOJ argues courts can't challenge president's National Guard mobilization decisions ## What We Know The claim that the Department of Ju...

Fact Check: DOJ argues courts can't challenge president's National Guard mobilization decisions

What We Know

The claim that the Department of Justice (DOJ) argues that courts cannot challenge the president's decisions regarding National Guard mobilization is rooted in recent legal proceedings involving President Donald Trump's deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles. During a hearing at the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, DOJ attorney Brett Shumate stated that “there’s no role for the court to play in reviewing that decision” regarding the president's authority to call up the National Guard (source-3). This assertion reflects a broader interpretation of presidential powers under federal law, which grants the president significant discretion in deploying military forces, including the National Guard, without necessarily requiring judicial oversight (source-2).

The context of this legal battle involves a lawsuit filed by California Governor Gavin Newsom, who argued that Trump's deployment of the National Guard was unlawful and violated state sovereignty. A lower court had ruled in favor of Newsom, stating that the president exceeded his authority, but the appeals court has temporarily paused that ruling while it considers the case (source-1).

Analysis

The DOJ's position reflects a legal interpretation that emphasizes the president's broad authority under Title 10 of the U.S. Code, which allows for the mobilization of the National Guard during times of national emergency or unrest. The argument presented by the DOJ suggests that the courts should refrain from intervening in such executive decisions, which they argue are clear under the statute (source-7).

However, this interpretation is not universally accepted. Critics, including legal experts and state officials, argue that the deployment of the National Guard without the governor's consent undermines state sovereignty and the principle of checks and balances inherent in the U.S. political system. Judge Charles Breyer, who ruled against the deployment, emphasized that the protests in Los Angeles did not meet the legal definition of a "rebellion," which would justify such federal action (source-1).

The reliability of the sources reporting on this case is generally high, as they include major news outlets and legal analyses. However, the interpretation of the law can vary significantly depending on the political and legal perspectives of the commentators involved (source-5).

Conclusion

The claim that the DOJ argues courts cannot challenge the president's National Guard mobilization decisions is Partially True. While the DOJ has indeed taken a stance suggesting that such decisions are beyond judicial review, this view is contested in the courts and by state officials. The ongoing legal proceedings will ultimately determine the extent of presidential authority in this context and whether judicial review is permissible.

Sources

  1. Appeals court hears arguments in National Guard ...
  2. Appeals court questions judges' ability to review Trump's ...
  3. WATCH: Federal appeals court considers Trump's ...
  4. Appeals panel scrutinizes judge's block on Trump national ...
  5. Appeals court seems poised to side with Trump on ...
  6. Trump lawyers call his decision to send troops to LA ...
  7. DOJ argues against judicial review of National Guard ...
  8. U.S. appeals court weighs Trump's deployment of National ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Ivory Coast has a two-term limit for presidents, but President Ouattara argues it does not apply to him due to a constitutional referendum passed in 2016.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Ivory Coast has a two-term limit for presidents, but President Ouattara argues it does not apply to him due to a constitutional referendum passed in 2016.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Ivory Coast has a two-term limit for presidents, but President Ouattara argues it does not apply to him due to a constitutional referendum passed in 2016.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Senate version of President Donald Trump's budget bill includes a provision that requires litigants to post bonds before courts can enforce orders blocking government policies.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The Senate version of President Donald Trump's budget bill includes a provision that requires litigants to post bonds before courts can enforce orders blocking government policies.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Senate version of President Donald Trump's budget bill includes a provision that requires litigants to post bonds before courts can enforce orders blocking government policies.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
🔍
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Business leaders and ex bank heads throw support behind Poilievre A number of prominent business leaders formally threw their support behind Pierre Poilievre in the upcoming federal election on Saturday, arguing his Conservative Party will best handle Canada’s slowing economic growth. The group of more than 30 current and past executives includes Fairfax Financial CEO Prem Watsa, Canaccord Genuity CEO Dan Daviau, former RBC Capital Markets CEO Anthony Fell and former Scotiabank CEO Brian Porter. They published an open letter in several Canadian newspapers on Saturday saying Poilievre's plans are best to get the country's economy "back on track." "Productivity has stalled. Economic growth has slowed. Our GDP per capita is shrinking," the letter reads. "Nevertheless, this decline is not inevitable -- and it's not the Canada we know and love." To turn things around, the letter said Canada needs to eliminate barriers to productivity by streamlining permit processes and cutting outdated regulations that prevent investment and job creation. It also said the government needs to be more disciplined with its spending, impose lower taxes to make Canada more competitive and develop the country's natural resources by building pipelines, expanding mining and investing in energy. The letter, which was also signed by former RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust founder Edward Sonshine, Mattamy Homes CEO Peter Gilgan and past Toronto Blue Jays president Paul Godfrey, is one of the strongest shows of support Poilievre has seen from the business community yet. His competitor, Liberal Mark Carney, has spent much of the election campaign, which concludes on April 28 when Canadians go to the polls, touting his experience as leader of the central banks in both Canada and England. He argues that experience leaves him best equipped to address the country's economic woes and tariff threats from U.S. President Donald Trump. The Liberals did not immediately respond to request for comment on the letter. The Conservatives, however, took the missive as a sign that their platform is resonating with the business community. “Pierre Poilievre’s Canada First Economic Action Plan is being recognized as a strong plan to lower taxes and eliminate red tape to unleash our industries and bring home powerful paycheques for our people and a thriving economy," Conservative spokesman Sam Lilly said in a statement. Poilievre revealed earlier this week that his plan is designed to cut bureaucratic red tape by 25 per cent in two years through a "two-for-one" law. The law would see two regulations be repealed for every new one that's enacted and require that every dollar spent on new administrative costs trigger the cutting of two dollars in other areas. Meanwhile, Carney has said he will boost interprovincial trade by removing all exemptions under the Canadian Free Trade Agreement, develop a new fund to help link natural resource extraction sites with rail lines and roads and create new programs geared toward training workers. NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said it was "no surprise" some business leaders are backing Poilievre and Carney because they're giving a tax break to the ultra-wealthy," rather than focusing on "what people actually need—health care, housing, and support when they lose a job." "Canadians are working hard but falling behind," Singh said in a statement. "Wages aren’t keeping up, housing is out of reach, and public services are stretched. The economy isn’t working for most people." This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 12, 2025. Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Business leaders and ex bank heads throw support behind Poilievre A number of prominent business leaders formally threw their support behind Pierre Poilievre in the upcoming federal election on Saturday, arguing his Conservative Party will best handle Canada’s slowing economic growth. The group of more than 30 current and past executives includes Fairfax Financial CEO Prem Watsa, Canaccord Genuity CEO Dan Daviau, former RBC Capital Markets CEO Anthony Fell and former Scotiabank CEO Brian Porter. They published an open letter in several Canadian newspapers on Saturday saying Poilievre's plans are best to get the country's economy "back on track." "Productivity has stalled. Economic growth has slowed. Our GDP per capita is shrinking," the letter reads. "Nevertheless, this decline is not inevitable -- and it's not the Canada we know and love." To turn things around, the letter said Canada needs to eliminate barriers to productivity by streamlining permit processes and cutting outdated regulations that prevent investment and job creation. It also said the government needs to be more disciplined with its spending, impose lower taxes to make Canada more competitive and develop the country's natural resources by building pipelines, expanding mining and investing in energy. The letter, which was also signed by former RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust founder Edward Sonshine, Mattamy Homes CEO Peter Gilgan and past Toronto Blue Jays president Paul Godfrey, is one of the strongest shows of support Poilievre has seen from the business community yet. His competitor, Liberal Mark Carney, has spent much of the election campaign, which concludes on April 28 when Canadians go to the polls, touting his experience as leader of the central banks in both Canada and England. He argues that experience leaves him best equipped to address the country's economic woes and tariff threats from U.S. President Donald Trump. The Liberals did not immediately respond to request for comment on the letter. The Conservatives, however, took the missive as a sign that their platform is resonating with the business community. “Pierre Poilievre’s Canada First Economic Action Plan is being recognized as a strong plan to lower taxes and eliminate red tape to unleash our industries and bring home powerful paycheques for our people and a thriving economy," Conservative spokesman Sam Lilly said in a statement. Poilievre revealed earlier this week that his plan is designed to cut bureaucratic red tape by 25 per cent in two years through a "two-for-one" law. The law would see two regulations be repealed for every new one that's enacted and require that every dollar spent on new administrative costs trigger the cutting of two dollars in other areas. Meanwhile, Carney has said he will boost interprovincial trade by removing all exemptions under the Canadian Free Trade Agreement, develop a new fund to help link natural resource extraction sites with rail lines and roads and create new programs geared toward training workers. NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said it was "no surprise" some business leaders are backing Poilievre and Carney because they're giving a tax break to the ultra-wealthy," rather than focusing on "what people actually need—health care, housing, and support when they lose a job." "Canadians are working hard but falling behind," Singh said in a statement. "Wages aren’t keeping up, housing is out of reach, and public services are stretched. The economy isn’t working for most people." This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 12, 2025. Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press

Apr 13, 2025
Read more →
🔍
False

Fact Check: Exposed: FBI in Emergency Operation to Protect Epstein’s Elite Pedophile Network — Over 1,000 Agents Reassigned to Bury the Truth Before Trump Releases the Bombshell Files! The FBI has officially declared war on truth. What’s happening in their New York office isn’t justice — it’s a high-level operation to protect child traffickers in suits, crowns, and boardrooms. Trump is forcing their hand. He holds the full list — unredacted. And now, over 1,000 FBI agents have been pulled from national security to do one thing: scrub the Epstein files before they go public. Think about that. While cartels flood the border, foreign threats rise, and Americans suffer — the FBI is pulling 12-hour overnight shifts to protect rapists of children. They're not investigating — they’re sanitizing evidence to keep the power structure intact. This is a deep state firewall operation. Agents have been ordered to redact victims’ info — but leave Epstein’s associates untouched. The monsters stay anonymous. The system stays safe. It’s not a mistake. It’s a plan. This isn’t about Epstein. It never was. This is about the ones he served — the shadow government. The ones who blackmailed politicians, compromised world leaders, and used Epstein’s island as a trap. The names in those files could shatter the global order. Judges. Tech CEOs. Media puppeteers. Royals. Intelligence assets. Trump isn’t playing their game anymore. He forced the release of JFK files last week — fully unredacted. He knows it’s all connected: JFK, MLK, Epstein. All silenced by the same machine. And now the machine is glitching. FBI’s NY field director James Dennehy was forced to resign days after the exposure. He didn’t “retire.” He was pushed out. The house of cards is falling, and Trump is pulling the thread. Pam Bondi promised transparency. She delivered lies. But she accidentally admitted it: SDNY is hiding thousands more Epstein files. The same courts that protected Epstein are still protecting the network. But Trump already has everything. That’s why they’re panicking. That’s why agents are sleeping in the office. Not to save you — to save the elites. The redactions mean nothing. The real files are coming. And when they hit — it won’t just expose Epstein. It will expose the entire shadow empire: banks, royalty, Hollywood, Big Pharma, the Vatican. This is the collapse. Trump broke the firewall. They can’t stop what’s coming. Tick-tock.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Exposed: FBI in Emergency Operation to Protect Epstein’s Elite Pedophile Network — Over 1,000 Agents Reassigned to Bury the Truth Before Trump Releases the Bombshell Files! The FBI has officially declared war on truth. What’s happening in their New York office isn’t justice — it’s a high-level operation to protect child traffickers in suits, crowns, and boardrooms. Trump is forcing their hand. He holds the full list — unredacted. And now, over 1,000 FBI agents have been pulled from national security to do one thing: scrub the Epstein files before they go public. Think about that. While cartels flood the border, foreign threats rise, and Americans suffer — the FBI is pulling 12-hour overnight shifts to protect rapists of children. They're not investigating — they’re sanitizing evidence to keep the power structure intact. This is a deep state firewall operation. Agents have been ordered to redact victims’ info — but leave Epstein’s associates untouched. The monsters stay anonymous. The system stays safe. It’s not a mistake. It’s a plan. This isn’t about Epstein. It never was. This is about the ones he served — the shadow government. The ones who blackmailed politicians, compromised world leaders, and used Epstein’s island as a trap. The names in those files could shatter the global order. Judges. Tech CEOs. Media puppeteers. Royals. Intelligence assets. Trump isn’t playing their game anymore. He forced the release of JFK files last week — fully unredacted. He knows it’s all connected: JFK, MLK, Epstein. All silenced by the same machine. And now the machine is glitching. FBI’s NY field director James Dennehy was forced to resign days after the exposure. He didn’t “retire.” He was pushed out. The house of cards is falling, and Trump is pulling the thread. Pam Bondi promised transparency. She delivered lies. But she accidentally admitted it: SDNY is hiding thousands more Epstein files. The same courts that protected Epstein are still protecting the network. But Trump already has everything. That’s why they’re panicking. That’s why agents are sleeping in the office. Not to save you — to save the elites. The redactions mean nothing. The real files are coming. And when they hit — it won’t just expose Epstein. It will expose the entire shadow empire: banks, royalty, Hollywood, Big Pharma, the Vatican. This is the collapse. Trump broke the firewall. They can’t stop what’s coming. Tick-tock.

Apr 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Trump DOJ paid Babbitt’s estate $5 million to settle.
Partially True

Fact Check: The Trump DOJ paid Babbitt’s estate $5 million to settle.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Trump DOJ paid Babbitt’s estate $5 million to settle.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Two courts ruled Trump's tariffs unlawful on different grounds.
Partially True

Fact Check: Two courts ruled Trump's tariffs unlawful on different grounds.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Two courts ruled Trump's tariffs unlawful on different grounds.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: DOJ argues courts can't challenge president's National Guard mobilization decisions. | TruthOrFake Blog