Fact Check: Democrats haven't won a statewide race in Texas since 1994.

Fact Check: Democrats haven't won a statewide race in Texas since 1994.

Published June 26, 2025
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "Democrats haven't won a statewide race in Texas since 1994." ## What We Know The claim that "Democrats haven't won a statewide race in...

Fact Check: "Democrats haven't won a statewide race in Texas since 1994."

What We Know

The claim that "Democrats haven't won a statewide race in Texas since 1994" is a statement that has circulated in various political discussions. To assess its accuracy, we need to consider the historical context of statewide elections in Texas.

Since 1994, the Texas Democratic Party has faced significant challenges in statewide elections. The last Democrat to win a statewide office was Governor Ann Richards, who was defeated in 1994 by Republican George W. Bush. Since then, Republicans have dominated statewide races, winning the governorship and other key offices such as Attorney General, Lieutenant Governor, and various judicial positions.

However, it is important to note that while Democrats have not won statewide offices, they have been competitive in some elections, particularly in recent years. For instance, in the 2018 gubernatorial election, Democrat Beto O'Rourke garnered a substantial number of votes against incumbent Governor Greg Abbott, indicating a potential shift in voter sentiment.

Analysis

The assertion that Democrats have not won a statewide race since 1994 is factually correct based on the historical election data. However, the context of this claim is crucial. The Texas political landscape has been heavily influenced by demographic changes, voter turnout, and party organization efforts.

While the claim is accurate, it lacks nuance. For example, during the 2020 presidential election, Joe Biden received a significant portion of the vote in Texas, suggesting that Democrats may be gaining ground in urban and suburban areas. Furthermore, the increasing diversity of the Texas electorate could play a significant role in future elections, as demographic shifts may favor Democratic candidates.

The sources of this claim primarily stem from political commentary and analysis rather than empirical data. Therefore, while the statement holds true, it is essential to consider the evolving political dynamics in Texas and the potential for future Democratic victories.

Conclusion

Needs Research: The claim that "Democrats haven't won a statewide race in Texas since 1994" is accurate but requires further exploration of the political context and trends in Texas. The lack of recent Democratic victories does not necessarily indicate a permanent status quo, as changing demographics and voter preferences could lead to different outcomes in future elections. Therefore, more comprehensive research is needed to understand the implications of this claim fully.

Sources

  1. YouTube
  2. YouTube - Apps on Google Play
  3. YouTube - YouTube
  4. m - YouTube
  5. YouTube TV
  6. Music - YouTube
  7. Trending - YouTube
  8. YouTube Help - Google Help

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Since WWII:

Jobs under Democrats: 50 million
Jobs under Republicans: 1 million
Real GDP Growth Rate Dems: 4.3%
Real GDP Growth Rate Repubs: 2.5%
Unemployment Rates: Lower under Democrats
Inflation Rates: Lower under Democrats
Budget Deficits: Lower under Democrats
Stock Market Returns: Higher under Democrats
Recessions under Republicans: 84%
Recessions under Democrats: 16%
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Since WWII: Jobs under Democrats: 50 million Jobs under Republicans: 1 million Real GDP Growth Rate Dems: 4.3% Real GDP Growth Rate Repubs: 2.5% Unemployment Rates: Lower under Democrats Inflation Rates: Lower under Democrats Budget Deficits: Lower under Democrats Stock Market Returns: Higher under Democrats Recessions under Republicans: 84% Recessions under Democrats: 16%

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Since WWII: Jobs under Democrats: 50 million Jobs under Republicans: 1 million Real GDP Growth Rate Dems: 4.3% Real GDP Growth Rate Repubs: 2.5% Unemployment Rates: Lower under Democrats Inflation Rates: Lower under Democrats Budget Deficits: Lower under Democrats Stock Market Returns: Higher under Democrats Recessions under Republicans: 84% Recessions under Democrats: 16%

Aug 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The White House was in chaos. Democrats were panicking. Biden admitted he couldn’t finish the race or the job.
One year ago today, Joe Biden stepped down.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The White House was in chaos. Democrats were panicking. Biden admitted he couldn’t finish the race or the job. One year ago today, Joe Biden stepped down.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The White House was in chaos. Democrats were panicking. Biden admitted he couldn’t finish the race or the job. One year ago today, Joe Biden stepped down.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
I cannot believe that Trump is
cutting Medicaid. Actually,
what I meant to say is that I
can't believe he's not cutting
more of it because medicaid is
a money laundering scheme for
your government.
Congratulations all you
bleeding heart democrats.
Instead of raging against the
machine, you're bending over
for it. Medicaid is jointly run
by the states and the feds and
for every one dollar that your
state allocates to the program,
the Feds turn around and match
that at a level of one 00
percent so one dollar up to
nine dollars. And this money
comes from taxpayers in other
00:34
states. Your money has a 900%
return rate at someone else's
expense. Why wouldn't you
expand the program? Thanks
Obama. That's exactly how we
wound up with way too many
Medicaid recipients in the
first place. Like everything
related to healthcare the
providers are in bed with the
government on this one too
because the government can tax
the providers. 1. Use that
dollar to collect the up to
nine dollars in federal funds
and to reimburse the provider
their original dollar. What?
Robbing the taxpayer to pad the
funding pool leading to
increase reimbursements for
01:06
Medicaid for the providers.
Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a
health care facility, I'm
saying sign me up to that. Yes,
the medical industrial complex
totally has your best interest
in mind so go ahead and swallow
up those vaccines like a good
little comrade. Age me harder
daddy. And speaking of
comrades, do you know how many
people in this country receive
Medicaid that shouldn't? Before
you start screaming, everyone
should get free health care.
Not the argument here. We do
not have universal health care
in the United States. It
doesn't work and since we don't
have it, that means someone is
paying for it and guess what?
There are lower-income families
01:37
who don't qualify for the
benefits but they're taxpayers
and they're being burdened by
this. Back to the point which
is that the system is insanely
abused. I used to do child
support referee work for years
and you would v
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: "HERE ARE SOME STATS FOX NEWS DOESN'T WANT YOU TO KNOW.
52 MILLION JOBS HAVE BEEN CREATED SINCE THE COLD WAR.
DEMOCRATIC ADMINISTRATIONS CREATED 50 MILLION.
REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATIONS CREATED 1.9 MILLION.
REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTS HAVE ONE THING IN COMMON: RECESSION!"
- GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM
OCCUPY
DEMOCRATS
Partially True

Fact Check: "HERE ARE SOME STATS FOX NEWS DOESN'T WANT YOU TO KNOW. 52 MILLION JOBS HAVE BEEN CREATED SINCE THE COLD WAR. DEMOCRATIC ADMINISTRATIONS CREATED 50 MILLION. REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATIONS CREATED 1.9 MILLION. REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTS HAVE ONE THING IN COMMON: RECESSION!" - GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM OCCUPY DEMOCRATS

Detailed fact-check analysis of: "HERE ARE SOME STATS FOX NEWS DOESN'T WANT YOU TO KNOW. 52 MILLION JOBS HAVE BEEN CREATED SINCE THE COLD WAR. DEMOCRATIC ADMINISTRATIONS CREATED 50 MILLION. REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATIONS CREATED 1.9 MILLION. REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTS HAVE ONE THING IN COMMON: RECESSION!" - GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM OCCUPY DEMOCRATS

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In 1860, there were fewer than 10 Republicans in the United States who owned slaves, and the vast majority of the approximately four million slaves were owned by Democrats.
Partially True

Fact Check: In 1860, there were fewer than 10 Republicans in the United States who owned slaves, and the vast majority of the approximately four million slaves were owned by Democrats.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In 1860, there were fewer than 10 Republicans in the United States who owned slaves, and the vast majority of the approximately four million slaves were owned by Democrats.

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Democrats literally fled to this District to protest gerrymandering
True

Fact Check: Democrats literally fled to this District to protest gerrymandering

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Democrats literally fled to this District to protest gerrymandering

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →