Fact Check: Congress may face harsh cuts or tax increases to save Social Security!

Fact Check: Congress may face harsh cuts or tax increases to save Social Security!

Published June 19, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Congress may face harsh cuts or tax increases to save Social Security!" ## What We Know The Social Security trust fund is projected to...

Fact Check: "Congress may face harsh cuts or tax increases to save Social Security!"

What We Know

The Social Security trust fund is projected to run out of cash by 2033, according to a report from the program's trustees. After this point, incoming payroll taxes will only be able to cover approximately 77% of expected benefits, leading to an automatic cut of about 23% for over 60 million retirees and their families unless Congress intervenes (NPR). This situation has arisen due to a combination of demographic shifts, including an aging population and fewer young workers contributing to the system, as well as legislative changes that have increased benefits for certain groups (NPR).

Congress has several options to address this impending shortfall, including raising taxes, cutting benefits, or a combination of both. The trustees have emphasized that taking action sooner would allow for a broader range of solutions and give the public time to prepare for any changes (NPR).

Analysis

The claim that Congress may face harsh cuts or tax increases to save Social Security is supported by credible evidence. The NPR report outlines the dire financial situation of the Social Security trust fund and the potential consequences of inaction. The urgency of the situation is underscored by the fact that the deadline for action has moved up by nine months compared to previous estimates (NPR).

The reliability of the sources used in this analysis is high. NPR is a well-respected news organization known for its thorough reporting and fact-checking. The data presented comes from the Social Security Administration's trustees, who are tasked with monitoring the program's financial health. This lends additional credibility to the claims made regarding the trust fund's solvency and the potential need for legislative action.

Additionally, the discussion of various legislative proposals, such as the Social Security Check Tax Cut Act (GovTrack.us), indicates that there is ongoing debate and consideration of how to address the funding issues. However, the lack of enacted legislation to date suggests that significant political hurdles remain.

Conclusion

The claim that "Congress may face harsh cuts or tax increases to save Social Security" is True. The evidence indicates that without legislative intervention, significant cuts to Social Security benefits are inevitable as the trust fund is projected to be depleted by 2033. Congress has the option to raise taxes or cut benefits, but the urgency of the situation calls for immediate action to prevent a substantial reduction in benefits for millions of Americans.

Sources

  1. Social Security benefits face big cuts in 2033, unless Congress acts - NPR
  2. S. 2800 (118 th ): Social Security Check Tax Cut Act - GovTrack.us
  3. S.2800 - Social Security Check Tax Cut Act 118th Congress - Congress.gov
  4. Social Security 2100 Act | Congressman John Larson
  5. Proposals to Change Social Security - SSA.gov
  6. NEWS: As Republicans Attempt to Undermine Social Security - Senate Democrats
  7. Social Security benefits face big cuts in 2033 if Congress - NPR
  8. Social Security Benefits Could Be Cut in 8 Years Unless Congress Acts - NY Times

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  a congressional bill will lead to about $900 billion to $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts, which will force hospitals like Nyack Hospital and Westchester Hospital to cut services, staff, and care.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: a congressional bill will lead to about $900 billion to $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts, which will force hospitals like Nyack Hospital and Westchester Hospital to cut services, staff, and care.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: a congressional bill will lead to about $900 billion to $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts, which will force hospitals like Nyack Hospital and Westchester Hospital to cut services, staff, and care.

Aug 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: DEMOCRATS USE A FAKE POLL THAT ADDS UP TO 110% IN CONGRESS
"THAT'S A FAKE POLL"
WICK
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: DEMOCRATS USE A FAKE POLL THAT ADDS UP TO 110% IN CONGRESS "THAT'S A FAKE POLL" WICK

Detailed fact-check analysis of: DEMOCRATS USE A FAKE POLL THAT ADDS UP TO 110% IN CONGRESS "THAT'S A FAKE POLL" WICK

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: US congress is trying to block anime from the US
False

Fact Check: US congress is trying to block anime from the US

Detailed fact-check analysis of: US congress is trying to block anime from the US

Aug 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Here's 8 things Congress has enacted that I'd be willing to bet wouldn't have been passed if someone had to say these things on live TV:

Cannot determine - wrong language 4

1. $465,339-Teaching Pigeons to Gamble

2, 2.3m dollars injecting beagles with cocain

3,385k studying duck penises

4, 75k blowiing lizard out of trees with leaf blowers
Unverified

Fact Check: Here's 8 things Congress has enacted that I'd be willing to bet wouldn't have been passed if someone had to say these things on live TV: Cannot determine - wrong language 4 1. $465,339-Teaching Pigeons to Gamble 2, 2.3m dollars injecting beagles with cocain 3,385k studying duck penises 4, 75k blowiing lizard out of trees with leaf blowers

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Here's 8 things Congress has enacted that I'd be willing to bet wouldn't have been passed if someone had to say these things on live TV: Cannot determine - wrong language 4 1. $465,339-Teaching Pigeons to Gamble 2, 2.3m dollars injecting beagles with cocain 3,385k studying duck penises 4, 75k blowiing lizard out of trees with leaf blowers

Aug 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The sole goal of this administration is to prevent the release of these files, which is why Trump has leaned on Republicans in Congress to block the release of the files five times. It's why Trump conspired with Pam Bondi to cook up this plan to pivot to grand jury testimonies instead of releasing the information she already has at her disposal. If Trump was orchestrating a cover up, there is quite literally nothing he would do differently than what he's doing right now."
Unverified

Fact Check: The sole goal of this administration is to prevent the release of these files, which is why Trump has leaned on Republicans in Congress to block the release of the files five times. It's why Trump conspired with Pam Bondi to cook up this plan to pivot to grand jury testimonies instead of releasing the information she already has at her disposal. If Trump was orchestrating a cover up, there is quite literally nothing he would do differently than what he's doing right now."

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The sole goal of this administration is to prevent the release of these files, which is why Trump has leaned on Republicans in Congress to block the release of the files five times. It's why Trump conspired with Pam Bondi to cook up this plan to pivot to grand jury testimonies instead of releasing the information she already has at her disposal. If Trump was orchestrating a cover up, there is quite literally nothing he would do differently than what he's doing right now."

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Congress may face harsh cuts or tax increases to save Social Security! | TruthOrFake Blog