How does TruthOrFake work?

TruthOrFake uses advanced artificial intelligence to analyze claims against reliable sources. When you submit a claim, our AI searches for relevant information, assesses credibility, and provides a verdict with detailed explanation and sources.

Is TruthOrFake free to use?

Yes, the basic version of TruthOrFake is free for anyone to use. We also offer premium plans for organizations and researchers who need advanced features.

How accurate is TruthOrFake?

TruthOrFake provides a high degree of accuracy by analyzing multiple reliable sources. However, as with any AI tool, we recommend cross-checking important information with established fact-checking organizations for critical decisions.

Fact Check: DEMOCRATS USE A FAKE POLL THAT ADDS UP TO 110% IN CONGRESS "THAT'S A FAKE POLL" WICK

Fact Check: "Democrats Use a Fake Poll That Adds Up to 110% in Congress"

What We Know

During a recent House Oversight subcommittee hearing on the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Representative Melanie Stansbury (D-NM) presented a poll that was later criticized for its mathematical inaccuracies. Specifically, the poll, which was purportedly from Quinnipiac University, added up to 110%, a figure that is mathematically impossible for percentage-based data. Representative Brian Jack (R-GA) was the first to point out this error during the hearing, asking, "The poll behind you... it adds up to 110 percent. Just wanted to clarify, is it meant to add up to 110 percent, or is that an error?" Stansbury confirmed that the data was indeed from a Quinnipiac poll conducted two weeks prior, asserting its validity despite the glaring mistake (source-1, source-5).

The error was highlighted by other members of Congress, including Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), who stated, "That’s a fake poll right there!" This incident has sparked discussions around the credibility of the data presented and the implications of using flawed statistics in legislative settings (source-4, source-2).

Analysis

The claim that Democrats used a "fake poll" is substantiated by the evidence presented during the hearing. The mathematical error of totaling 110% indicates a significant oversight in the data's presentation. Polls typically should add up to 100%, representing the totality of responses across all categories. The failure to adhere to this basic principle raises questions about the reliability of the data and the professionalism of those presenting it.

The sources reporting on this incident, including Mediaite and OutKick, provide a detailed account of the events and reactions from various congressional members. Mediaite, known for its political commentary, provides a thorough analysis of the incident, while OutKick offers a more casual take. Both sources highlight the error and the subsequent fallout, lending credibility to the claim that the poll was flawed (source-1, source-5).

However, it is essential to consider the potential biases of the sources. Mediaite, while reputable, often leans towards a conservative audience, which may influence its framing of the incident. OutKick, similarly, has a more casual and potentially sensationalist approach. Nonetheless, the core facts regarding the mathematical error remain consistent across multiple reports.

Conclusion

The claim that Democrats used a "fake poll" that added up to 110% is True. The evidence presented during the congressional hearing clearly indicates a significant mathematical error in the poll data, leading to valid concerns about its authenticity and the implications of using such flawed statistics in a legislative context. The incident underscores the importance of accuracy in data presentation, especially in political discourse.