Fact Check: Both Hamas and Otzma Yehudit are Fascists

Claim Analysis: "Both Hamas and Otzma Yehudit are Fascists"

1. Introduction

The claim that "both Hamas and Otzma Yehudit are Fascists" suggests a parallel between the ideologies and actions of these two groups, one being a Palestinian Islamist organization and the other a far-right Israeli political party. This assertion raises significant questions about the definitions of fascism, the political contexts of both entities, and the implications of labeling them as such.

2. What We Know

Hamas

Hamas, officially known as the Islamic Resistance Movement, is a Palestinian nationalist and Sunni Islamist organization that has both a political and a military wing, the latter known as the Qassam Brigades. Founded in 1987 during the First Intifada, Hamas has been involved in various conflicts with Israel and is recognized as a terrorist organization by several countries, including the United States and the European Union 4. The group advocates for Palestinian nationalism and has a charter that includes the establishment of an Islamic state in historical Palestine.

Otzma Yehudit

Otzma Yehudit, or Jewish Power, is a far-right political party in Israel, founded in 2012. It is often described as advocating for Jewish supremacy and has been labeled by some scholars and commentators as a "Jewish fascist" group due to its ultranationalist positions, including calls for the annexation of the West Bank and the expulsion of Arab citizens deemed "disloyal" 25. The party is part of the current Israeli government coalition led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 1.

Definitions of Fascism

Fascism is generally characterized by authoritarianism, ultranationalism, and the suppression of dissent. The term has been applied variably, and its usage can be contentious, especially when discussing contemporary political movements 36.

3. Analysis

Evaluating the Claim

The assertion that both Hamas and Otzma Yehudit are fascist can be examined through the lens of their ideologies and actions.

1. Hamas: The label of "Islamofascism" has been used by some commentators to describe Hamas, linking its authoritarian governance and militant tactics to fascist principles 6. However, this term is controversial and often criticized for oversimplifying complex political realities and conflating Islamism with fascism. The organization’s primary focus on Palestinian nationalism and Islamic governance may not fit neatly into traditional definitions of fascism.

2. Otzma Yehudit: The party's policies, such as advocating for the deportation of Arab citizens and promoting a one-state solution that favors Jewish supremacy, align with some characteristics of fascism, particularly ultranationalism and authoritarianism 27. Critics argue that such positions reflect a shift towards a more extreme right-wing ideology in Israeli politics.

Source Reliability

• Wikipedia: While Wikipedia can provide a good starting point for information, it is important to cross-reference its claims with more authoritative sources, as entries can be edited by anyone and may reflect bias.
• The Times of Israel and Haaretz: These are established news outlets in Israel, but they may have editorial biases—Haaretz is generally seen as left-leaning, while The Times of Israel is often viewed as centrist or slightly right-leaning. Their articles on Otzma Yehudit and Hamas provide valuable insights but should be read with an understanding of their potential biases 710.
• Academic and Human Rights Organizations: Sources like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch are often cited in discussions about the human rights implications of both Hamas and Otzma Yehudit, but their reports can also reflect specific ideological perspectives 1.

Conflicts of Interest

Some sources may have inherent biases based on their political affiliations or funding sources. For instance, organizations that advocate for human rights may frame their critiques of Hamas and Otzma Yehudit in ways that align with their broader missions, which could influence the portrayal of these groups.

4. Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim that "both Hamas and Otzma Yehudit are Fascists" is partially true. Evidence suggests that Otzma Yehudit's ultranationalist and authoritarian policies align more closely with certain characteristics of fascism, particularly in its advocacy for Jewish supremacy and the expulsion of Arab citizens. In contrast, while some commentators have labeled Hamas as "Islamofascist," this characterization is contentious and may oversimplify the organization's complex political and ideological landscape, which is primarily rooted in Palestinian nationalism rather than a strict adherence to fascist principles.

It is important to recognize the limitations in the available evidence. The definitions of fascism can vary widely, and applying this label to contemporary political movements often involves subjective interpretations. Additionally, the political contexts of both groups are distinct, which complicates direct comparisons.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider the nuances involved in such politically charged discussions. The application of the term "fascist" should be approached with caution, as it can carry significant implications and may not fully capture the realities of the groups in question.

5. Sources

1. Far-right politics in Israel - Wikipedia. Link
2. Otzma Yehudit - Wikipedia. Link
3. Ultranationalism - Wikipedia. Link
4. Hamas - Wikipedia. Link
5. Otzma Yehudit - Simple English Wikipedia. Link
6. Islamofascism - Wikipedia. Link
7. Ben Gvir's policy goals: Going to extremes even Europe's far right won't touch | The Times of Israel. Link
8. JPost survey shows why Israelis see Hamas as the new Nazis - The Jerusalem Post. Link
9. Far-right Otzma Yehudit returning to the government after resumption of war in Gaza | The Times of Israel. Link
10. 'No Innocents in Gaza': Reflecting on Israel's First Fascist War | Haaretz. Link