Fact Check: Benny Morris is right about Israel

Fact Check: "Benny Morris is right about Israel"

What We Know

Benny Morris is a prominent Israeli historian known for his work on the Arab-Israeli conflict, particularly regarding the events surrounding the 1948 Palestinian exodus. He is often associated with the "New Historians," a group that challenged traditional narratives of Israeli history by utilizing declassified government archives (Wikipedia). Morris's seminal work, The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947–1948, argues that the Palestinian exodus was significantly influenced by actions taken by Israeli forces, contradicting the prevailing narrative that it was solely due to Arab leaders' orders (Wikipedia).

Over the years, Morris's views have evolved, particularly after the Second Intifada, where he expressed more hardline positions regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He has controversially suggested that under certain conditions, ethnic cleansing could be justified, a statement that has drawn significant criticism (Wikipedia, 18Forty). His recent interviews indicate a pessimistic outlook on the prospects for peace between Israelis and Palestinians, stating that he does not believe peace will occur within his lifetime (18Forty).

Analysis

The claim that "Benny Morris is right about Israel" is complex and cannot be easily verified or dismissed. Morris's historical interpretations have been both praised and criticized across the political spectrum. His initial work brought to light the complexities of the 1948 events, which many historians now view as foundational to understanding the conflict (Wikipedia). However, his later views, particularly his acceptance of certain hardline stances, have led to accusations of ideological shifts that some argue undermine his earlier scholarship (CAMERA, Los Angeles Times).

Critics of Morris argue that his recent positions reflect a departure from his earlier, more nuanced understanding of the conflict. For example, his assertion that ethnic cleansing may be justified under certain circumstances has been met with widespread condemnation and is seen as a significant shift from his earlier views that emphasized the humanitarian aspects of the Palestinian plight (Wikipedia, 18Forty).

On the other hand, supporters argue that Morris's evolving views reflect a realistic assessment of the ongoing conflict and the challenges to peace, particularly in light of the violence and hostilities that have characterized recent years (18Forty). His work continues to be influential, serving as a reference point for discussions about Israeli history and the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Conclusion

The verdict on the claim "Benny Morris is right about Israel" is Partially True. While Morris has made significant contributions to the understanding of Israeli history and the Palestinian refugee issue, his evolving views, particularly in the context of the Second Intifada and beyond, complicate a straightforward endorsement of his positions. His insights into historical events are valuable, but his later justifications for certain actions taken by Israel raise ethical questions that cannot be overlooked. Thus, while he is a critical figure in Israeli historiography, the interpretation of his views requires careful consideration of the broader context and implications.