TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Are QY speed cubes good?

Fact Check: Are QY speed cubes good?

Published May 7, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
Mostly True

# Are QY Speed Cubes Good? ## Introduction The claim in question is whether QY (QiYi) speed cubes are considered good within the speedcubing communit...

Are QY Speed Cubes Good?

Introduction

The claim in question is whether QY (QiYi) speed cubes are considered good within the speedcubing community. Speed cubes are specialized puzzles designed for competitive speedcubing, and their performance can vary significantly based on design, materials, and technology. This article will explore various sources to assess the quality and performance of QiYi speed cubes.

What We Know

  1. Performance and Features: QiYi speed cubes, such as the QiYi M Pro and QiYi Warrior S, are generally recognized for their performance. The QiYi M Pro, for instance, has been noted for its well-calibrated magnets and effective corner-cutting capabilities, which are crucial for speedcubing 2. The Warrior S is described as a great budget option for beginners 5.

  2. Comparisons with Other Brands: In comparisons with other brands like MoYu, QiYi cubes have received mixed reviews. For example, a comparison between the MoYu Meilong and QiYi 9x9 cubes highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of both brands, indicating that while QiYi has competitive models, they may not always outperform their rivals 7.

  3. User Reviews: User reviews and expert opinions vary widely. Some reviewers praise QiYi cubes for their smooth turning and affordability 4, while others have criticized specific models, such as the QiYi Smart Cube, for poor performance and a subpar app experience 3.

  4. Market Position: QiYi is positioned as a significant player in the speedcubing market, offering a range of products that cater to both beginners and advanced users. Their cubes are often featured in discussions about the best speed cubes available 8.

Analysis

The evaluation of QiYi speed cubes involves examining the credibility of the sources and the methodologies used in their assessments:

  1. Source Credibility:

    • New York Times Wirecutter: This source is known for its thorough product testing and reviews, making it a reliable reference for understanding the general performance of speed cubes 1. However, it does not focus specifically on QiYi, which may limit its relevance.
    • SpeedCubeDB: This site specializes in speed cube reviews and provides detailed insights into specific models, making it a credible source for performance evaluations 2. However, it is essential to consider that the site may have a vested interest in promoting certain brands.
    • YouTube Reviews: Video reviews, such as those from individual reviewers, can provide valuable firsthand experiences but may also reflect personal biases. For example, the negative review of the QiYi Smart Cube highlights significant performance issues, which could be an outlier or indicative of broader problems 3.

  2. Methodology and Evidence: The methodologies used in reviews vary. Some rely on user experiences and performance metrics, while others may focus on technical specifications. The lack of standardized testing across different reviews makes it challenging to draw definitive conclusions about the overall quality of QiYi cubes.

  3. Conflicts of Interest: Some sources, particularly those affiliated with retailers like SpeedCubeShop, may have conflicts of interest, as they benefit from promoting certain products. This potential bias should be considered when evaluating the information provided 46.

  4. Diverse Opinions: The range of opinions about QiYi cubes suggests that while many users find them satisfactory, there are notable exceptions. This variability indicates that personal preferences and specific use cases play a significant role in determining whether a QiYi cube is "good."

Conclusion

Verdict: Mostly True

The assessment of QiYi speed cubes reveals that they are generally well-regarded within the speedcubing community, particularly for their performance and affordability. Key evidence supporting this verdict includes positive reviews of specific models like the QiYi M Pro and Warrior S, which highlight their competitive features. However, the mixed reviews and criticisms of certain models, such as the QiYi Smart Cube, introduce a level of uncertainty regarding the overall quality of the brand.

It is important to note that while many users find QiYi cubes satisfactory, individual experiences can vary significantly based on personal preferences and specific use cases. Additionally, the lack of standardized testing methods across different reviews limits the ability to make definitive claims about the brand's performance as a whole.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information themselves and consider both positive and negative feedback when deciding on a speed cube. The diversity of opinions within the community suggests that while QiYi cubes are a solid choice for many, they may not be the best fit for everyone.

Sources

  1. The 3 Best Speed Cubes (And Why the Rubik's Cube Isn't One) - New York Times Wirecutter
  2. Product Reviews - Speed Cube Database - SpeedCubeDB
  3. The Worst Cube I've Ever Reviewed? | QiYi Smart Cube - YouTube
  4. The World of QiYi Speed Cubes - SpeedCubeShop - SpeedCubeShop
  5. QiYi Warrior S 3x3 - Whats new? + Comparison - YouTube
  6. QiYi Cubes - SpeedCubeShop - SpeedCubeShop
  7. MoYu 9x9 Vs QiYi 9x9 Speed Cube Review & Comparison - GAREGEAR
  8. Top Rated Cubes - SpeedCubeReview.com - SpeedCubeReview
  9. The Best Speedcubes [2022] - YouTube
  10. QiYi Cubes - SpeedCubeShop

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The kind of masculine energy, I think, is good. Having a culture that celebrates the aggression a bit more has its own merits. That was Mark Zuckerberg speaking on the Joe Rogan podcast in January. The Meta CEO made these comments just as his company was announcing sweeping policy changes, from unwinding its hate speech rules, to rolling back diversity efforts, to breaking up its civil rights team, to ending the fact-checking program that infuriated President Donald Trump during his first term in office. The speed and scope of these moves gave many onlookers a sense of whiplash. So we spoke to more than 50 people about Mark Zuckerberg's politics and his tumultuous relationship to Washington over the years to find out what's up.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The kind of masculine energy, I think, is good. Having a culture that celebrates the aggression a bit more has its own merits. That was Mark Zuckerberg speaking on the Joe Rogan podcast in January. The Meta CEO made these comments just as his company was announcing sweeping policy changes, from unwinding its hate speech rules, to rolling back diversity efforts, to breaking up its civil rights team, to ending the fact-checking program that infuriated President Donald Trump during his first term in office. The speed and scope of these moves gave many onlookers a sense of whiplash. So we spoke to more than 50 people about Mark Zuckerberg's politics and his tumultuous relationship to Washington over the years to find out what's up.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The kind of masculine energy, I think, is good. Having a culture that celebrates the aggression a bit more has its own merits. That was Mark Zuckerberg speaking on the Joe Rogan podcast in January. The Meta CEO made these comments just as his company was announcing sweeping policy changes, from unwinding its hate speech rules, to rolling back diversity efforts, to breaking up its civil rights team, to ending the fact-checking program that infuriated President Donald Trump during his first term in office. The speed and scope of these moves gave many onlookers a sense of whiplash. So we spoke to more than 50 people about Mark Zuckerberg's politics and his tumultuous relationship to Washington over the years to find out what's up.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Speed queen is worth the money
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Speed queen is worth the money

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Speed queen is worth the money

Aug 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: VIA Rail's on-time performance dropped from 72% to 30% due to CN's speed restrictions.
True

Fact Check: VIA Rail's on-time performance dropped from 72% to 30% due to CN's speed restrictions.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: VIA Rail's on-time performance dropped from 72% to 30% due to CN's speed restrictions.

Jul 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: High-speed rail construction costs in California now exceed the original budget for the entire project.
True

Fact Check: High-speed rail construction costs in California now exceed the original budget for the entire project.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: High-speed rail construction costs in California now exceed the original budget for the entire project.

Jul 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The speed of 3I ATLAS is approximately 60 kilometers per second.
Unverified

Fact Check: The speed of 3I ATLAS is approximately 60 kilometers per second.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The speed of 3I ATLAS is approximately 60 kilometers per second.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks