TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Speed queen is worth the money

Fact Check: Speed queen is worth the money

Published August 18, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact-Check: "Speed Queen is Worth the Money" ## What We Know Speed Queen is a brand known for its durable washing machines, primarily designed for...

Fact-Check: "Speed Queen is Worth the Money"

What We Know

Speed Queen is a brand known for its durable washing machines, primarily designed for commercial use but also available for residential customers. According to a review by Wirecutter from The New York Times, Speed Queen washers are built to last, with an expected lifespan of around 25 years and capable of enduring approximately 10,400 wash cycles. The company emphasizes durability in its manufacturing process, with residential models coming off the same assembly line as commercial ones. This focus on sturdiness has led to increasing popularity among consumers who are disillusioned with the durability of other brands.

However, the pricing of Speed Queen washers is notably high. The basic model starts at around $1,259, while top models can exceed $2,500, as noted in a recent review from Best Washing Machines. While they are marketed as long-lasting and reliable, some reviews indicate mixed performance regarding cleaning efficiency, particularly for their newer models. For instance, the TR-series top-loaders have received criticism for poor cleaning performance despite their durability.

Analysis

The claim that "Speed Queen is worth the money" can be evaluated from multiple angles, including durability, performance, and cost-effectiveness.

  1. Durability: Speed Queen's reputation for durability is well-supported. The brand's washers are designed to withstand heavy use, which is a significant selling point for many consumers. The Wirecutter review provides detailed insights into their rigorous testing processes, which further reinforces the claim of durability.

  2. Performance: While the durability of Speed Queen washers is praised, their cleaning performance has been called into question. The Best Washing Machines review highlights that although Speed Queen washers are built to last, some models, particularly the TR-series, have not performed well in cleaning tests. This suggests that while they may be durable, they might not meet all consumers' expectations for washing performance, which is a critical factor for many buyers.

  3. Cost: The high price point of Speed Queen washers is another critical factor. As mentioned, the base model starts at $1,259, which is considerably higher than many competitors that offer similar or better cleaning performance at lower prices. The Consumer Affairs review indicates that customer satisfaction is mixed, with some users reporting issues with electronic components shortly after purchase, raising questions about the overall value for money.

  4. Customer Feedback: Reviews on platforms like Consumer Affairs show a stark contrast in user satisfaction, with an average rating of 1.1 stars out of 5, indicating that many customers have had negative experiences despite the brand's claims of durability and quality. This discrepancy suggests that while Speed Queen may be worth the investment for some, particularly those prioritizing durability, it may not be the best choice for all consumers, especially those who value performance and customer service.

Conclusion

The verdict on the claim that "Speed Queen is worth the money" is Partially True. While Speed Queen washers are indeed built for durability and have a strong reputation for lasting many years, their high price point and mixed reviews regarding cleaning performance and customer satisfaction complicate the assessment of their overall value. For consumers prioritizing longevity and who are willing to invest in a high-end appliance, Speed Queen may be worth the money. However, for those seeking efficient cleaning performance at a more reasonable price, other brands might be a better fit.

Sources

  1. Speed Queen Review | Reviews by Wirecutter - The New York Times
  2. Speed Queen Review for August 2025 | Best Washing Machines
  3. Speed Queen Reviews 2025: Cost, Pros & Cons - ConsumerAffairs
  4. Speed Queen Top-Load Washer Review 2025: Reliability, Costs ...
  5. 6 Speed Queen Washing Machine Reviews in 2025 (Pro Tips)
  6. The 10 Best Speed Queen Washing Machine Review For 2025
  7. Speed Queen Washing Machine Reviews: Expert Analysis and Real ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: High-speed rail can significantly reduce travel time between major cities.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: High-speed rail can significantly reduce travel time between major cities.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: High-speed rail can significantly reduce travel time between major cities.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The kind of masculine energy, I think, is good. Having a culture that celebrates the aggression a bit more has its own merits. That was Mark Zuckerberg speaking on the Joe Rogan podcast in January. The Meta CEO made these comments just as his company was announcing sweeping policy changes, from unwinding its hate speech rules, to rolling back diversity efforts, to breaking up its civil rights team, to ending the fact-checking program that infuriated President Donald Trump during his first term in office. The speed and scope of these moves gave many onlookers a sense of whiplash. So we spoke to more than 50 people about Mark Zuckerberg's politics and his tumultuous relationship to Washington over the years to find out what's up.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The kind of masculine energy, I think, is good. Having a culture that celebrates the aggression a bit more has its own merits. That was Mark Zuckerberg speaking on the Joe Rogan podcast in January. The Meta CEO made these comments just as his company was announcing sweeping policy changes, from unwinding its hate speech rules, to rolling back diversity efforts, to breaking up its civil rights team, to ending the fact-checking program that infuriated President Donald Trump during his first term in office. The speed and scope of these moves gave many onlookers a sense of whiplash. So we spoke to more than 50 people about Mark Zuckerberg's politics and his tumultuous relationship to Washington over the years to find out what's up.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The kind of masculine energy, I think, is good. Having a culture that celebrates the aggression a bit more has its own merits. That was Mark Zuckerberg speaking on the Joe Rogan podcast in January. The Meta CEO made these comments just as his company was announcing sweeping policy changes, from unwinding its hate speech rules, to rolling back diversity efforts, to breaking up its civil rights team, to ending the fact-checking program that infuriated President Donald Trump during his first term in office. The speed and scope of these moves gave many onlookers a sense of whiplash. So we spoke to more than 50 people about Mark Zuckerberg's politics and his tumultuous relationship to Washington over the years to find out what's up.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: VIA Rail's on-time performance dropped from 72% to 30% due to CN's speed restrictions.
True

Fact Check: VIA Rail's on-time performance dropped from 72% to 30% due to CN's speed restrictions.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: VIA Rail's on-time performance dropped from 72% to 30% due to CN's speed restrictions.

Jul 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: High-speed rail construction costs in California now exceed the original budget for the entire project.
True

Fact Check: High-speed rail construction costs in California now exceed the original budget for the entire project.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: High-speed rail construction costs in California now exceed the original budget for the entire project.

Jul 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The speed of 3I ATLAS is approximately 60 kilometers per second.
Unverified

Fact Check: The speed of 3I ATLAS is approximately 60 kilometers per second.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The speed of 3I ATLAS is approximately 60 kilometers per second.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks