Fact Check: Are PDO threads safe?

Fact Check: Are PDO threads safe?

Published May 7, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Are PDO Threads Safe? ## Introduction The claim in question revolves around the safety of PDO (Polydioxanone) threads, which are used in non-surgic...

Are PDO Threads Safe?

Introduction

The claim in question revolves around the safety of PDO (Polydioxanone) threads, which are used in non-surgical cosmetic procedures known as thread lifts. These threads are designed to lift and tighten sagging skin, offering an alternative to surgical facelifts. However, concerns about their safety and potential complications have been raised, leading to questions about whether PDO threads are indeed safe for cosmetic use.

What We Know

  1. Definition and Use: PDO threads are absorbable sutures that are inserted under the skin to provide a lifting effect. They are made from a biodegradable material known for its compatibility with the body 39.

  2. Complication Rates: A study published in the Aesthetic Surgery Journal reported a complication rate of 34% among 160 participants undergoing PDO thread lifts. Complications included minor side effects such as dimpling and facial stiffness, which typically resolve on their own 1.

  3. Potential Risks: Common risks associated with PDO thread lifts include allergic reactions, bleeding, infection, and temporary difficulties such as mouth opening 810. Other sources indicate that while the risks are generally minimal, they can still occur, and the skill of the practitioner is crucial for minimizing these risks 65.

  4. Expert Opinions: Some medical professionals assert that PDO thread lifts have a strong safety record when performed by experienced practitioners. They emphasize the importance of choosing a qualified provider to ensure a safe experience 45.

  5. Long-term Effects: PDO threads are said to stimulate collagen production over time, potentially leading to longer-lasting results. However, the long-term safety and efficacy of PDO threads are still subjects of ongoing research 43.

Analysis

When evaluating the safety of PDO threads, it is essential to consider the reliability of the sources providing information.

  • Medical and Aesthetic Sources: Websites like RealSelf and Cleveland Clinic provide insights based on clinical experiences and studies, but they may also have a vested interest in promoting cosmetic procedures. For instance, RealSelf is a platform where practitioners can advertise their services, which could introduce a bias in favor of PDO threads 18.

  • Clinical Studies: The Aesthetic Surgery Journal study cited is a peer-reviewed source, which generally lends credibility. However, the reported complication rate of 34% raises concerns about the safety of the procedure, suggesting that while many may experience minor issues, the prevalence of complications is significant 1.

  • Marketing and Promotional Content: Sources like MINT™ PDO and Beyond Health Medspa appear to be promotional in nature, emphasizing the benefits of PDO threads while downplaying risks. This could lead to a biased portrayal of the safety profile of the procedure 23.

  • Expert Commentary: Articles from dermatology clinics and aesthetic practices often highlight the importance of practitioner skill, which is a critical factor in the safety of PDO thread lifts. However, these sources may not provide a comprehensive view of the risks involved, focusing instead on the positive outcomes 57.

In summary, while there are numerous sources discussing the safety of PDO threads, the potential for bias and the varying levels of expertise among practitioners necessitate a cautious approach to interpreting these claims.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim regarding the safety of PDO threads is deemed "Partially True" based on the evidence reviewed. While PDO threads are made from a biodegradable material and can be performed safely by experienced practitioners, the reported complication rate of 34% from a peer-reviewed study raises significant concerns about their safety. Minor complications are common, and while many resolve without intervention, the potential for more serious risks exists.

It is important to note that the safety of PDO threads can be influenced by the skill and experience of the practitioner, which adds a layer of complexity to the assessment of their overall safety. Additionally, the long-term effects and safety of PDO threads remain subjects of ongoing research, indicating that our understanding may evolve as more data becomes available.

Readers should be aware of the limitations in the available evidence, including potential biases in promotional content and the varying quality of sources discussing PDO threads. Therefore, it is crucial to approach claims about their safety with a critical mindset and to consult qualified professionals when considering such procedures. Always evaluate information carefully and seek multiple perspectives before making health-related decisions.

Sources

  1. How a PDO Thread Lift Works, How Long It Lasts, Risks & More - RealSelf. Link
  2. Are PDO Threads Safe? A Closer Look at ... - MINT™ PDO. Link
  3. Are PDO Threads Safe, Permanent, and Effective? Explained - Beyond Health Medspa. Link
  4. The Safety of PDO Thread Lifts: What You Need to Know - Protoculture. Link
  5. PDO Thread Lift Safety: What You Need To Know - NWME Aesthetics. Link
  6. Unveiling the Risks of PDO Threads | Your Safety Matters - Qazi Clinic. Link
  7. How Safe Are PDO Threads for Skin Tightening? - Kingston Dermatology. Link
  8. Thread Lift: What to Expect, Benefits & Complications - Cleveland Clinic. Link
  9. Are PDO Threads Dangerous? - Medical SPA RX. Link
  10. Thread Lift Risks and Safety - American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Are PDO threads worth it?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are PDO threads worth it?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are PDO threads worth it?

May 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is Anadius safe?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is Anadius safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Anadius safe?

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is zip extractor safe?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is zip extractor safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is zip extractor safe?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is xylitol safe?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is xylitol safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is xylitol safe?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is wowroms safe?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is wowroms safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is wowroms safe?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →