Fact Check: Are calls made under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) protected?

Published May 2, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Are Calls Made Under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) Protected? The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) is a federal law that provides elig...

Are Calls Made Under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) Protected?

The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) is a federal law that provides eligible employees with the right to take unpaid, job-protected leave for specific family and medical reasons. A common question arises regarding whether calls made under the FMLA are protected from employer retaliation. This article examines the protections afforded by the FMLA, the implications for employees who make such calls, and the reliability of the sources that discuss these protections.

What We Know

  1. FMLA Overview: The FMLA entitles eligible employees to take up to 12 workweeks of unpaid leave per year for certain family and medical reasons, including the birth of a child, serious health conditions, or caring for a family member with a serious health condition. This leave is job-protected, meaning employees are entitled to return to their same or equivalent position after the leave ends 34.

  2. Protection Against Retaliation: The FMLA explicitly prohibits employers from retaliating against employees for exercising their rights under the Act. This includes making calls to request leave or inquire about FMLA rights. According to the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), employers cannot discriminate against employees for having exercised or attempted to exercise FMLA rights 126.

  3. Legal Framework: The relevant legal provisions can be found in 29 CFR § 825.220, which outlines that employers are prohibited from interfering with, restraining, or denying the exercise of any rights provided by the FMLA. This includes protection for employees who make inquiries or requests related to their FMLA rights 68.

  4. Filing Complaints: Employees who believe their FMLA rights have been violated can file a complaint with the Wage and Hour Division of the DOL or pursue a private lawsuit against their employer 5.

Analysis

Source Reliability

The primary sources of information regarding FMLA protections are official documents from the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). These sources are generally considered reliable as they are government publications that provide legal guidelines and protections under the FMLA.

  • U.S. Department of Labor (DOL): The DOL is the federal agency responsible for enforcing labor laws, including the FMLA. Their fact sheets and FAQs are designed to inform both employers and employees about their rights and obligations under the law 124. However, while these sources are authoritative, they may present information in a way that emphasizes employee protections, which could introduce a bias towards the employee's perspective.

  • Code of Federal Regulations (CFR): The CFR is a comprehensive codification of the rules published by the executive departments and agencies of the U.S. federal government. Regulations found in the CFR, such as 29 CFR § 825.220, are legally binding and provide a clear legal framework for FMLA protections 68. This source is highly reliable as it reflects the law itself.

Conflicts of Interest

While the DOL and CFR are credible sources, it is important to consider that the DOL's mission includes promoting worker rights, which may influence the presentation of information. However, this does not inherently diminish the accuracy of the legal protections outlined.

Methodology and Evidence

The claim regarding the protection of calls made under the FMLA is supported by the explicit language of the law and the regulations. The DOL's fact sheets and the CFR provide a clear understanding of the protections against retaliation, including for inquiries made about FMLA rights. However, the application of these protections can vary based on individual circumstances, such as the employer's policies and the specific context of the call made by the employee.

Additional Information Needed

While the existing sources provide a solid foundation regarding the protections under the FMLA, additional case law examples or legal interpretations would be beneficial to understand how these protections have been applied in real-world scenarios. Furthermore, insights from legal experts or employment law attorneys could provide a more nuanced understanding of how retaliation cases are handled in practice.

Conclusion

Verdict: True

The evidence supports the conclusion that calls made under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) are indeed protected from employer retaliation. The explicit language of the FMLA and the regulations outlined in 29 CFR § 825.220 clearly state that employees cannot be discriminated against for exercising their rights under the Act, which includes making inquiries or requests related to FMLA leave.

However, it is important to acknowledge that while the legal framework provides robust protections, the application of these protections can vary depending on individual circumstances and employer policies. The effectiveness of these protections may also be influenced by the specific context of each case, which could lead to different outcomes in practice.

Readers should also be aware that while the sources cited are reliable, they primarily reflect the legal perspective and may not encompass all potential nuances in real-world applications. Therefore, it is advisable for individuals to critically evaluate information and consider seeking legal counsel if they believe their rights under the FMLA have been violated.

Sources

  1. U.S. Department of Labor. "Fact Sheet # 77B: Protection for Individuals under the FMLA." Link
  2. U.S. Department of Labor. "Fact Sheet #28A: Employee Protections under the Family and Medical Leave Act." Link
  3. U.S. Department of Labor. "Family and Medical Leave Act." Link
  4. U.S. Department of Labor. "FMLA Frequently Asked Questions." Link
  5. U.S. Department of Labor. "Your Employee Rights Under the Family and Medical Leave Act." Link
  6. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. "29 CFR 825.220 -- Protection for employees who request leave or." Link
  7. U.S. Department of Labor. "Family and Medical Leave (FMLA)." Link
  8. Cornell Law School. "29 CFR § 825.220 - Protection for employees who request leave or." Link
  9. USA.gov. "The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)." Link
  10. U.S. Office of Personnel Management. "Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) 12-Week Entitlement." Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Aug 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Chris Smalls, who took on Amazon and won, was assaulted by the Israeli military while participating in the Gaza Freedom Flotilla, a peaceful aid mission carrying food, insulin, diapers, and water filters to starved Gaza. Israeli forces intercepted the ship in international waters, cut communications, boarded the boat, physically assaulted Chris with choking and kicking, leaving him bruised and bleeding. The assault was racially motivated, and despite public calls for solidarity, there is silence
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Chris Smalls, who took on Amazon and won, was assaulted by the Israeli military while participating in the Gaza Freedom Flotilla, a peaceful aid mission carrying food, insulin, diapers, and water filters to starved Gaza. Israeli forces intercepted the ship in international waters, cut communications, boarded the boat, physically assaulted Chris with choking and kicking, leaving him bruised and bleeding. The assault was racially motivated, and despite public calls for solidarity, there is silence

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Chris Smalls, who took on Amazon and won, was assaulted by the Israeli military while participating in the Gaza Freedom Flotilla, a peaceful aid mission carrying food, insulin, diapers, and water filters to starved Gaza. Israeli forces intercepted the ship in international waters, cut communications, boarded the boat, physically assaulted Chris with choking and kicking, leaving him bruised and bleeding. The assault was racially motivated, and despite public calls for solidarity, there is silence

Aug 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: michigan law calls for ice officers to be jailed for wearing mask
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: michigan law calls for ice officers to be jailed for wearing mask

Detailed fact-check analysis of: michigan law calls for ice officers to be jailed for wearing mask

Aug 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  FEMA CALLS
WENT UNANSWERED AFTER FLOODS BECAUSE NOEM DID NOT RENEW CONTRACTS
True

Fact Check: FEMA CALLS WENT UNANSWERED AFTER FLOODS BECAUSE NOEM DID NOT RENEW CONTRACTS

Detailed fact-check analysis of: FEMA CALLS WENT UNANSWERED AFTER FLOODS BECAUSE NOEM DID NOT RENEW CONTRACTS

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Kids running from tear gas, crying O the phone because their mother was just taken from the fields. Trump calls me "Newscum" "_ but he's the real scum
True

Fact Check: Kids running from tear gas, crying O the phone because their mother was just taken from the fields. Trump calls me "Newscum" "_ but he's the real scum

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Kids running from tear gas, crying O the phone because their mother was just taken from the fields. Trump calls me "Newscum" "_ but he's the real scum

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Avelo Airlines partnered with ICE for deportation flights, prompting calls for boycott.
True

Fact Check: Avelo Airlines partnered with ICE for deportation flights, prompting calls for boycott.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Avelo Airlines partnered with ICE for deportation flights, prompting calls for boycott.

Jul 14, 2025
Read more →