Fact Check: "All other Minnesota state lawmakers are under protective custody in coordination with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety and local law enforcement following the shooting incident."
What We Know
The claim that all Minnesota state lawmakers are under protective custody following a shooting incident is not substantiated by any credible sources. As of now, there has been no official announcement or documentation from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety or any local law enforcement agencies indicating that all lawmakers are under protective custody.
Recent legislative activities, such as the introduction of HF 3615, focus on establishing a pilot program for active shooter response equipment in schools, but do not mention any protective measures for state lawmakers. Additionally, the Minnesota Department of Public Safety has not released any statements regarding the protective custody of lawmakers in relation to any shooting incidents.
Analysis
The claim lacks credible backing and appears to be a misinterpretation or exaggeration of the current situation. The Minnesota Department of Public Safety and local law enforcement agencies are responsible for public safety and may implement protective measures in specific situations; however, there is no evidence to suggest that such measures have been broadly applied to all lawmakers.
The absence of any official communication or documentation regarding the protective custody of lawmakers raises questions about the reliability of the claim. Furthermore, the legislative focus on active shooter response, as seen in HF 3615, indicates a proactive approach to safety but does not imply that lawmakers are currently in danger or require protective custody.
Conclusion
Verdict: False
The claim that all Minnesota state lawmakers are under protective custody due to a shooting incident is unfounded. There is no evidence or official statement supporting this assertion, and it appears to be a misrepresentation of the current safety measures in place for lawmakers.