Fact Check: "All other Minnesota state lawmakers are under protective custody in coordination with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety and local law enforcement jurisdictions following the shooting incident on October 21, 2023."
What We Know
Following the shooting incident on October 21, 2023, there has been significant concern regarding the safety of Minnesota state lawmakers. However, there is no credible evidence to support the claim that all other lawmakers are under protective custody. As of now, the Minnesota Department of Public Safety has not issued any statements confirming that all lawmakers are receiving such protection. Instead, reports indicate that while there may be increased security measures in place, particularly for those directly involved or affected by the incident, a blanket protective custody for all lawmakers has not been established (source-1).
Analysis
The claim that all Minnesota state lawmakers are under protective custody appears to be exaggerated or misinterpreted. The Minnesota Department of Public Safety is responsible for coordinating security measures, but the details of these measures have not been made public in a way that supports the sweeping assertion made in the claim.
Furthermore, the context of the shooting incident suggests that while security protocols may have been heightened, especially for those directly involved, it does not imply that every lawmaker is under protective custody. The absence of any official communication from law enforcement or government officials regarding a statewide protective custody order for all lawmakers raises questions about the reliability of the claim.
The sources available, including legislative documents and state portals, do not provide any evidence of a coordinated protective custody for all lawmakers, which further undermines the credibility of the claim (source-2, source-3).
Conclusion
Verdict: False
The claim that all other Minnesota state lawmakers are under protective custody is false. There is no supporting evidence or official confirmation from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety or any other credible source indicating that such a measure has been enacted for all lawmakers. The situation appears to be more nuanced, with heightened security for specific individuals rather than a blanket protective custody for the entire legislative body.
