Fact Check: A secured online signature formula is not necessarily damaged when there is an only visible spelling error.

Fact Check: A secured online signature formula is not necessarily damaged when there is an only visible spelling error.

Published June 24, 2025
by TruthOrFake AI
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "A secured online signature formula is not necessarily damaged when there is an only visible spelling error." ## What We Know The claim...

Fact Check: "A secured online signature formula is not necessarily damaged when there is an only visible spelling error."

What We Know

The claim suggests that a secured online signature formula remains intact even if there is a visible spelling error. Digital signatures are designed to ensure the integrity and authenticity of a document. According to Microsoft's guidelines, digital signatures are meant to verify that a document has not been altered after it was signed. If a document is modified in any way after signing, including spelling corrections, the digital signature may become invalid.

In practical scenarios, users have reported issues related to digital signatures and errors in forms. For example, in an Adobe community discussion, users encountered errors when sending forms for e-signature due to changes in the document that affected the formula fields, indicating that even minor changes can lead to significant issues with digital signatures (Adobe Community).

Analysis

The reliability of the claim hinges on the understanding of how digital signatures function. Digital signatures utilize cryptographic techniques to bind a person's identity to a document. If any part of the document is altered, including text changes such as spelling errors, the signature may no longer be valid. This is supported by Microsoft's documentation, which states that changes to a signed document will invalidate the signature (Microsoft).

However, the claim's assertion that a spelling error alone does not damage the signature could be true in some contexts. For instance, if the spelling error does not affect the signed content or the integrity of the signature itself, it might not invalidate the signature. This nuance is not universally applicable and depends on the specific implementation of the digital signature technology.

The sources consulted provide a mixed view. While Microsoft emphasizes the importance of document integrity, user experiences highlight that minor errors can lead to significant issues, suggesting that the claim may not hold universally true. The credibility of the sources is generally high, with Microsoft being a leading authority on digital signatures and Adobe being a well-known software provider.

Conclusion

Verdict: Needs Research
The claim that a secured online signature formula is not necessarily damaged by a visible spelling error requires further investigation. While there are scenarios where minor errors may not affect the validity of a signature, the general principle of digital signatures indicates that any alteration can compromise the integrity of the signed document. Therefore, more comprehensive research is needed to clarify the conditions under which a spelling error might or might not affect a digital signature.

Sources

  1. ASFINAG
  2. Why are we geeting "Enter a Valid Formula" message... - Adobe Product ...
  3. Outlook signature disables spell check - Super User
  4. ASFINAG Shop pedaggio
  5. Outlook Signatures don't spell check - is this a setting I can turn on ...
  6. Application Guidelines on Digital Signature Practices for ...
  7. Die Vignette - ASFINAG
  8. Digital signatures and code signing in workbooks in Excel

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Australians only rank third in online swearing, at 22 per 100,000 words.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Australians only rank third in online swearing, at 22 per 100,000 words.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Australians only rank third in online swearing, at 22 per 100,000 words.

Jun 22, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Ethan Raines blames online negativity for Mikayla's suicide.
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Ethan Raines blames online negativity for Mikayla's suicide.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Ethan Raines blames online negativity for Mikayla's suicide.

Jun 24, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Shannon Seamster was given a $2,500 secured bond following her arrest for DWI.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Shannon Seamster was given a $2,500 secured bond following her arrest for DWI.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Shannon Seamster was given a $2,500 secured bond following her arrest for DWI.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Eric Trump secured a deal in April 2023 for the construction of the Trump International Golf Club & Villas in Qatar, which is part of a $5 billion luxury beachside resort.
True

Fact Check: Eric Trump secured a deal in April 2023 for the construction of the Trump International Golf Club & Villas in Qatar, which is part of a $5 billion luxury beachside resort.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Eric Trump secured a deal in April 2023 for the construction of the Trump International Golf Club & Villas in Qatar, which is part of a $5 billion luxury beachside resort.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: California's Governor Gavin Newsom secured $25 million to fund legal fights against the Trump administration in 2023.
False

Fact Check: California's Governor Gavin Newsom secured $25 million to fund legal fights against the Trump administration in 2023.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: California's Governor Gavin Newsom secured $25 million to fund legal fights against the Trump administration in 2023.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: YouTube star Mikayla Raines dies by suicide at 29, husband blames online abuse.
True

Fact Check: YouTube star Mikayla Raines dies by suicide at 29, husband blames online abuse.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: YouTube star Mikayla Raines dies by suicide at 29, husband blames online abuse.

Jun 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: A secured online signature formula is not necessarily damaged when there is an only visible spelling error. | TruthOrFake Blog