TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: 911 was conducted by CIA

Fact Check: 911 was conducted by CIA

Published March 13, 2025•Updated June 18, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✗
VERDICT
False

# Fact Check: "911 was conducted by CIA" ## What We Know The claim that the CIA conducted the 9/11 attacks is unfounded and lacks credible evidence. ...

Fact Check: "911 was conducted by CIA"

What We Know

The claim that the CIA conducted the 9/11 attacks is unfounded and lacks credible evidence. The official narrative, as detailed in the 9/11 Commission Report, attributes the attacks to the terrorist group al-Qaeda, led by Osama bin Laden. The report outlines how the attackers were motivated by a combination of factors, including opposition to U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East and a desire to retaliate against perceived injustices against Muslims.

The CIA, as stated on their official website, is primarily an intelligence agency responsible for gathering and analyzing information related to national security. Their mission does not include conducting terrorist attacks or orchestrating events like 9/11. The CIA's role is to provide intelligence to U.S. policymakers, which includes the President and the National Security Council, to inform decisions regarding national security (CIA Official Site).

Analysis

The assertion that the CIA was involved in the orchestration of the 9/11 attacks is a conspiracy theory that has been widely debunked. The 9/11 Commission Report is a comprehensive document that investigated the circumstances surrounding the attacks, detailing failures in intelligence and communication among various agencies, including the CIA and FBI. However, it does not support the claim that the CIA was responsible for the attacks.

Moreover, the CIA's own statements emphasize their role in intelligence gathering and analysis, not in executing terrorist operations. The agency's mission is clearly outlined as providing objective intelligence to assist policymakers in making informed decisions, rather than engaging in covert actions that would involve carrying out attacks against U.S. citizens or interests (About CIA - CIA).

The sources used to evaluate this claim are credible and authoritative. The 9/11 Commission Report is a government document that resulted from a bipartisan investigation, while the CIA's official statements reflect their established mission and operational guidelines. Both sources are reliable and do not support the conspiracy theory that the CIA conducted the 9/11 attacks.

Conclusion

Verdict: False
The claim that the CIA conducted the 9/11 attacks is not supported by credible evidence. The attacks were perpetrated by al-Qaeda, as established by the 9/11 Commission Report. The CIA's role is to provide intelligence, not to execute terrorist operations. The assertion reflects a misunderstanding of the agency's mission and the events of September 11, 2001.

Sources

  1. We are the Nation's first line of defense - CIA
  2. The 9/11 Commission Report
  3. About CIA - CIA - The World Factbook
  4. DOC_0006184107.pdf
  5. The World Factbook - The World Factbook
  6. Directorate of Operations - CIA - The World Factbook
  7. History of CIA - CIA - The World Factbook
  8. Special Report: A Review of the FBI's Handling of Intelligence ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: 911 was conducted by CIA
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: 911 was conducted by CIA

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 911 was conducted by CIA

Apr 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 911 was conducted by jews
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: 911 was conducted by jews

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 911 was conducted by jews

Mar 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The CIA and FBI conducted a review of their intelligence assessments.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The CIA and FBI conducted a review of their intelligence assessments.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The CIA and FBI conducted a review of their intelligence assessments.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: is mossad behind 911
False

Fact Check: is mossad behind 911

Detailed fact-check analysis of: is mossad behind 911

Jul 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 911 helped Pentagon avoid the investigation
False

Fact Check: 911 helped Pentagon avoid the investigation

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 911 helped Pentagon avoid the investigation

Mar 13, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: 911 was conducted by CIA | TruthOrFake Blog