Fact Check: 911 helped Pentagon avoid the investigation

Fact Check: 911 helped Pentagon avoid the investigation

Published March 13, 2025Updated June 18, 2025
VERDICT
False

# Fact Check: "911 helped Pentagon avoid the investigation" ## What We Know The claim that "911 helped Pentagon avoid the investigation" suggests tha...

Fact Check: "911 helped Pentagon avoid the investigation"

What We Know

The claim that "911 helped Pentagon avoid the investigation" suggests that the events of September 11, 2001, somehow obstructed or prevented a thorough investigation into the Pentagon's actions or failures leading up to the attacks. However, extensive investigations were conducted following the attacks, including the FBI's largest case ever, known as "PENTTBOM," which focused on the attacks on the Pentagon, the World Trade Center, and Flight 93 (FBI).

The 9/11 Commission Report, published in 2004, provides a comprehensive account of the events leading up to and during the attacks, including the Pentagon's response (9/11 Commission Report). The report examined failures in intelligence and communication, and it made numerous recommendations to improve national security and emergency response protocols.

Furthermore, the Pentagon Memorial was established to honor the 184 individuals who lost their lives in the attack on the Pentagon, which underscores the significance of the event and the commitment to remembrance and accountability (National 9/11 Pentagon Memorial).

Analysis

The claim lacks credible evidence and misrepresents the extensive investigations that took place after the attacks. The assertion that the attacks somehow shielded the Pentagon from scrutiny is contradicted by the findings of the 9/11 Commission, which explicitly addressed failures and lapses in security and intelligence that contributed to the attacks. The Commission's work was thorough and included testimony from numerous officials, including military and intelligence personnel.

Moreover, the claim appears to be rooted in conspiracy theories that have circulated since the attacks, which often misinterpret or distort facts to suggest that the U.S. government was complicit in the events of 9/11 (9/11 conspiracy theories). These theories have been widely debunked by credible sources, including the Associated Press, which clarified that videos circulating online claiming to show a missile hitting the Pentagon are false; the footage actually depicts American Airlines Flight 77 crashing into the building (AP News).

The reliability of the sources that support the claim is questionable, as they often stem from conspiracy-oriented narratives rather than established facts. In contrast, the investigations by the FBI and the findings of the 9/11 Commission are well-documented and supported by a wide array of evidence.

Conclusion

The claim that "911 helped Pentagon avoid the investigation" is False. Extensive investigations were conducted following the attacks, and the Pentagon was not shielded from scrutiny. The 9/11 Commission Report and the FBI's investigations highlighted numerous failures and made recommendations for improvement, demonstrating a commitment to accountability rather than avoidance.

Sources

  1. 9/11 Investigation — FBI
  2. The National 9/11 Pentagon Memorial
  3. The 9/11 Commission Report
  4. Video does not show missile hitting the Pentagon on 9/11
  5. American Airlines Flight 77 - Wikipedia
  6. 9/11 conspiracy theories

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: During 911 one of plain hit pentagon to hide massive unjustified spendings
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: During 911 one of plain hit pentagon to hide massive unjustified spendings

Detailed fact-check analysis of: During 911 one of plain hit pentagon to hide massive unjustified spendings

Mar 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
911 was a false flag. For the
first 10 years, I did not think
anything other than the
official narrative then after
being shown a video, a close up
video of building number seven
coming down and that got me
going because it's obvious to
me that building seven was was
a controlled demolition because
the building collapses from the
bottom down. The trade centers
were unique in that they were
designed to withstand the
00:33
impact of a a a jet. From what
I understand the the outer
skeleton of the building. The
outer columns was like a a fish
net and you had these inner
core columns which was
substantial thick steel beams
to withstand four or five times
what the loads were. Got it.
The engineers always over
design a building. No steel
frame building has ever
collapsed before or since 9/
eleven. So that should say
something right there. And it
said that building seven it was
01:05
aggressive collapse that it was
caused by fire but progressive
collapse unlike the twin
towers, the twin towers
collapse from the top down.
That's a progressive collapse.
Sure. Floor by floor by floor.
But if you look at the videos
of building seven collapsing,
it collapses uniformly, it's
collapsing from the bottom, the
building stays intact all the
way to the bottom of the ground
and you could see the sides
caving in on it. For a building
to collapse uniformly which the
video show all the load bearing
it would have to have failed
01:36
simultaneously. Now, fire
doesn't act like that. I came
across an analogy of the twin
towers and if you could
visualize cast iron stoves
stacked. One on top of each
other. The stoves up at the
top. Yes, there's fire and
they've been damaged but the
stoves on the bottom, they
haven't been damaged. Okay. So,
the structure underneath all of
that is intact. So, it's
impossible for a building to
collapse near free fall speed
and increase. Without a
02:07
controlled demolition. You're
running into the path of most
resistance. I something else is
going on. I don't believe that
it was just the planes or the
fires I think that and they
examine the dust and they found
what they call thermitic
material which is like a
explosive incendiary which was
in the dust samples and that's
documented. There were reports
of the buildings were
undergoing a extensive elevator
renovation in the two or three
years prior to all kinds of
02:40
workers they had access to the
the core the cores of the
building and on the day of the
attack the the elevator company
would not assist in the
operations of the elevators and
the elevator company was the
elevator company it
subsequently went out of
business and a couple of years
after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: is mossad behind 911
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: is mossad behind 911

Detailed fact-check analysis of: is mossad behind 911

Jul 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 911 was conducted by CIA
False

Fact Check: 911 was conducted by CIA

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 911 was conducted by CIA

Apr 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 911 was conducted by CIA
False

Fact Check: 911 was conducted by CIA

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 911 was conducted by CIA

Mar 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 911 was conducted by jews
False

Fact Check: 911 was conducted by jews

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 911 was conducted by jews

Mar 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 911 helped Pentagon avoid the investigation | TruthOrFake Blog