TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: 385,000 ballots cast in New York's early voting period.

Fact Check: 385,000 ballots cast in New York's early voting period.

Published June 23, 2025
by TruthOrFake AI
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "385,000 ballots cast in New York's early voting period." ## What We Know During the early voting period for the New York City Democrat...

Fact Check: "385,000 ballots cast in New York's early voting period."

What We Know

During the early voting period for the New York City Democratic primary in June 2025, approximately 385,000 ballots were cast. This figure was confirmed by multiple sources, including the NYC Board of Elections, which reported that nearly 385,000 individuals participated in early voting by the final day on June 22, 2025 (ABC7). The early voting period began on June 14 and lasted until June 22, leading up to the primary election scheduled for June 24 (The New York Times).

Analysis

The claim that 385,000 ballots were cast is supported by reliable sources, including the NYC Board of Elections and major news outlets. The report from ABC7, which cited the Board of Elections directly, confirms the turnout figure (ABC7). Additionally, The New York Times provided context about the early voting process and the significance of the turnout, indicating a competitive primary race (The New York Times).

While there are other reports that mention different turnout figures, such as 305,896 ballots cast in the first eight days of early voting (NY1), these numbers are not contradictory but rather reflect the ongoing tally as the early voting period progressed. The final count of 385,000 includes all ballots cast up to the last day of early voting.

The sources used in this analysis are credible, with The New York Times being a well-respected publication known for its journalistic integrity. ABC7 is also a reputable local news outlet, providing timely updates on significant events in New York City.

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim that 385,000 ballots were cast in New York's early voting period is accurate. This figure is corroborated by multiple reliable sources, including the NYC Board of Elections and major news outlets, confirming that this was the total turnout by the end of the early voting period.

Sources

  1. Early Voting - New York State Board of Elections
  2. It's the Last Day of Early Voting in New York ... - The New York Times
  3. NYC mayor race 2025: Final day for early voting in New York City ...
  4. More than 300,000 New Yorkers have voted early so far
  5. Heated NYC Democratic mayoral primary inspires huge ... - New York Post

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The ranked-choice voting system in New York allows voters to rank up to five candidates on their ballots.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The ranked-choice voting system in New York allows voters to rank up to five candidates on their ballots.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The ranked-choice voting system in New York allows voters to rank up to five candidates on their ballots.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: District Judge Denise Casper ruled that Trump's attempts to require proof of citizenship on a federal registration form and to prevent states from counting mail ballots received after Election Day would unduly burden states.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: District Judge Denise Casper ruled that Trump's attempts to require proof of citizenship on a federal registration form and to prevent states from counting mail ballots received after Election Day would unduly burden states.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: District Judge Denise Casper ruled that Trump's attempts to require proof of citizenship on a federal registration form and to prevent states from counting mail ballots received after Election Day would unduly burden states.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: During the recent Wisconsin Supreme Court race, Milwaukee election officials allegedly processed ballots in secretive back rooms, blocking observers from watching the action. According to The Federalist, windows were covered, mail bins were stacked to obscure views, and the elections director, Paulina Gutierrez, reportedly kept these areas off-limits, even to folks like state Rep. Dave Maxey, who got a stern talking-to when he tried to peek inside. One room supposedly held stacks of blank ballots, and Gutierrez was seen hauling blue bags around, raising eyebrows about what was really going on. The city claims it’s all legit—sorting ballots by ward and such—but the lack of transparency is maddening. Wisconsin law says observers should have a clear view of the public parts of the process, yet here we are with frosted glass and restricted access. Sources say it’s a “perception issue,” which is putting it mildly. Here is my problem with this; every time democrats, who are in charge of administering elections in blue counties, pull stuff like this it makes every single sane person question the results of the election, and I would like to understand who that benefits? We cannot continue to watch things like this and then see no action afterwards because while I am not saying this would’ve changed the outcome, what I am saying is that this is against WI state law, it’s shady and it makes everyone question the legitimacy of the race.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: During the recent Wisconsin Supreme Court race, Milwaukee election officials allegedly processed ballots in secretive back rooms, blocking observers from watching the action. According to The Federalist, windows were covered, mail bins were stacked to obscure views, and the elections director, Paulina Gutierrez, reportedly kept these areas off-limits, even to folks like state Rep. Dave Maxey, who got a stern talking-to when he tried to peek inside. One room supposedly held stacks of blank ballots, and Gutierrez was seen hauling blue bags around, raising eyebrows about what was really going on. The city claims it’s all legit—sorting ballots by ward and such—but the lack of transparency is maddening. Wisconsin law says observers should have a clear view of the public parts of the process, yet here we are with frosted glass and restricted access. Sources say it’s a “perception issue,” which is putting it mildly. Here is my problem with this; every time democrats, who are in charge of administering elections in blue counties, pull stuff like this it makes every single sane person question the results of the election, and I would like to understand who that benefits? We cannot continue to watch things like this and then see no action afterwards because while I am not saying this would’ve changed the outcome, what I am saying is that this is against WI state law, it’s shady and it makes everyone question the legitimacy of the race.

Apr 10, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: 385,000 ballots cast in New York's early voting period. | TruthOrFake Blog