Fact Check: 28 states chose to ignore the birthright citizenship fight.

Fact Check: "28 states chose to ignore the birthright citizenship fight."

What We Know

The claim that "28 states chose to ignore the birthright citizenship fight" is rooted in the recent Supreme Court ruling regarding President Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship. This order aimed to limit citizenship for children born in the U.S. to parents who are undocumented immigrants. Following the issuance of this executive order, lawsuits were filed by immigrant rights groups and 22 states, primarily led by Democrats, to challenge its legality. Notably, three federal district courts issued nationwide injunctions to block the enforcement of the order (NPR, New York Times).

However, the Supreme Court's ruling did not address the constitutionality of the executive order itself but rather limited the ability of federal judges to issue universal injunctions against it. This ruling effectively allows the executive order to be enforced in states that did not challenge it, which includes 28 states such as Arkansas, Mississippi, North Dakota, and Texas (Reuters, NPR). Consequently, these states are now in a position where the executive order could be applied, leading to potential citizenship issues for children born to undocumented immigrants in those jurisdictions.

Analysis

The assertion that 28 states have "chosen to ignore" the birthright citizenship fight can be interpreted in a few ways. First, it is important to clarify that these states did not actively support the executive order; rather, they did not participate in the legal challenges against it. This lack of action means that, as of the Supreme Court's ruling, the executive order can be implemented in these states, potentially affecting the citizenship status of children born there (Washington Post, CBS News).

The reliability of the sources discussing this claim is high, as they include reputable news organizations that provide comprehensive coverage of the legal and political implications of the Supreme Court's decision. For instance, NPR and the New York Times have reported extensively on the implications of the ruling, highlighting the legal landscape surrounding birthright citizenship and the responses from various states and advocacy groups (NPR, New York Times).

However, it is crucial to note that the term "ignore" may imply a level of negligence or disregard that does not accurately reflect the situation. The states in question may have opted not to engage in the legal battle for a variety of reasons, including political strategy or resource allocation. Therefore, while the claim is technically accurate, it may oversimplify the complexities involved in the decisions made by these states.

Conclusion

The verdict on the claim that "28 states chose to ignore the birthright citizenship fight" is True. The Supreme Court's ruling allows the executive order to be enforced in these states, which did not challenge the order in court. This situation creates a legal environment where children born to undocumented immigrants in these states may face uncertainty regarding their citizenship status. While the language of "ignore" may not fully capture the nuances of the states' decisions, the essence of the claim aligns with the current legal reality.

Fact Check: 28 states chose to ignore the birthright citizenship fight.