Fact Check: "17-year-old girl shot in leg after firing back during NYC shooting."
What We Know
The claim that a "17-year-old girl shot in leg after firing back during NYC shooting" appears to be a misinterpretation of a recent incident involving two teenage girls shot near the historic Stonewall Inn during NYC's Pride celebrations. According to reports, the shooting occurred on a Sunday night after the Pride parade concluded. A 16-year-old girl was shot in the head and was in critical condition, while a 17-year-old girl was shot in the leg and was in stable condition (ABC News, NBC News).
The incident reportedly stemmed from a dispute in the crowd, and it was confirmed that the 17-year-old girl fired back at the shooter but missed and inadvertently struck the younger girl instead (NBC News). This context is critical as it clarifies that the 17-year-old did not shoot back at the shooter in a direct confrontation but rather accidentally hit another victim.
Analysis
The sources reporting on the incident, including ABC News and NBC News, provide detailed accounts of the events that transpired. Both outlets are reputable news organizations with a history of reliable reporting. The information indicates that the shooting was chaotic and involved multiple parties, with the 17-year-old girl firing her weapon in response to being shot at, which resulted in her hitting the 16-year-old girl instead.
However, the claim simplifies the situation and misrepresents the sequence of events. The 17-year-old girl was not the primary target nor was she directly involved in a shootout with an assailant; rather, she reacted to a shooting incident that was already in progress. This nuance is important for understanding the nature of the incident and the actions of the individuals involved.
Conclusion
The claim that a "17-year-old girl shot in leg after firing back during NYC shooting" is False. The incident involved a complex situation where the girl did fire a weapon but did not shoot at the original assailant; instead, she accidentally hit another victim. The misrepresentation of the events can lead to misunderstandings about the nature of the shooting and the actions of those involved.
