Fact Check: Working-age health-related benefit spending skyrockets from £36 billion to £52 billion in five years.

Fact Check: Working-age health-related benefit spending skyrockets from £36 billion to £52 billion in five years.

Published June 27, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "Working-age health-related benefit spending skyrockets from £36 billion to £52 billion in five years." ## What We Know The claim state...

Fact Check: "Working-age health-related benefit spending skyrockets from £36 billion to £52 billion in five years."

What We Know

The claim states that spending on working-age health-related benefits increased from £36 billion to £52 billion over a five-year period. According to a report by the Institute for Fiscal Studies, spending on these benefits did indeed rise from £36 billion in 2019-20 to £48 billion in 2023-24, with projections suggesting it could reach £63 billion by 2028-29 if current trends continue (source-4, source-6).

Additionally, the UK government's Spring Statement indicates that spending on working-age sickness and disability benefits increased by £20 billion since the pandemic and is projected to rise further, potentially reaching £70 billion annually by the end of the current Parliament (source-1, source-2).

Analysis

The claim is partially true. While the reported figures of £36 billion and £52 billion are not entirely accurate, the general trend of increasing expenditure on health-related benefits is supported by credible sources. The increase from £36 billion to £48 billion is documented, and the projection to reach £63 billion by 2028-29 aligns with the government's forecasts.

However, the claim's assertion of a rise to £52 billion specifically lacks direct support from the available data. The figures suggest a growth trajectory, but the exact figure of £52 billion is not confirmed within the context of the reported time frame. The source from the Institute for Fiscal Studies, which provides a detailed analysis of the changes in spending, is considered reliable and objective, as it is a well-respected independent research institute (source-4).

On the other hand, the government's Spring Statement is also a credible source, as it reflects official projections and analyses from the Department for Work and Pensions, although it may carry some bias towards justifying proposed reforms (source-1, source-2).

Conclusion

The claim that working-age health-related benefit spending skyrocketed from £36 billion to £52 billion in five years is partially true. While there is a significant increase in spending, the specific figures cited do not fully align with the available data. The increase from £36 billion to £48 billion is accurate, and projections indicate further growth, but the exact figure of £52 billion is not substantiated by the sources reviewed.

Sources

  1. PDF Spring Statement 2025 health and disability benefit reforms Impacts
  2. Spring Statement 2025 health and disability benefit reforms - GOV.UK
  3. The government's proposed reforms to health-related benefits: incomes ...
  4. Health-related benefit claims post-pandemic: UK trends and global ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
I cannot believe that Trump is
cutting Medicaid. Actually,
what I meant to say is that I
can't believe he's not cutting
more of it because medicaid is
a money laundering scheme for
your government.
Congratulations all you
bleeding heart democrats.
Instead of raging against the
machine, you're bending over
for it. Medicaid is jointly run
by the states and the feds and
for every one dollar that your
state allocates to the program,
the Feds turn around and match
that at a level of one 00
percent so one dollar up to
nine dollars. And this money
comes from taxpayers in other
00:34
states. Your money has a 900%
return rate at someone else's
expense. Why wouldn't you
expand the program? Thanks
Obama. That's exactly how we
wound up with way too many
Medicaid recipients in the
first place. Like everything
related to healthcare the
providers are in bed with the
government on this one too
because the government can tax
the providers. 1. Use that
dollar to collect the up to
nine dollars in federal funds
and to reimburse the provider
their original dollar. What?
Robbing the taxpayer to pad the
funding pool leading to
increase reimbursements for
01:06
Medicaid for the providers.
Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a
health care facility, I'm
saying sign me up to that. Yes,
the medical industrial complex
totally has your best interest
in mind so go ahead and swallow
up those vaccines like a good
little comrade. Age me harder
daddy. And speaking of
comrades, do you know how many
people in this country receive
Medicaid that shouldn't? Before
you start screaming, everyone
should get free health care.
Not the argument here. We do
not have universal health care
in the United States. It
doesn't work and since we don't
have it, that means someone is
paying for it and guess what?
There are lower-income families
01:37
who don't qualify for the
benefits but they're taxpayers
and they're being burdened by
this. Back to the point which
is that the system is insanely
abused. I used to do child
support referee work for years
and you would v
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Six in ten working-age people in Iran are unemployed.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Six in ten working-age people in Iran are unemployed.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Six in ten working-age people in Iran are unemployed.

Jul 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In the United States, 98% of larger employers offer health insurance as a benefit.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: In the United States, 98% of larger employers offer health insurance as a benefit.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In the United States, 98% of larger employers offer health insurance as a benefit.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Public documents and statements list alignment with Trump administration ideology (e.g. opposition to DEI or transgender policies) as the reason for the freeze—not to benefit Trump-owned businesses.
Partially True

Fact Check: Public documents and statements list alignment with Trump administration ideology (e.g. opposition to DEI or transgender policies) as the reason for the freeze—not to benefit Trump-owned businesses.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Public documents and statements list alignment with Trump administration ideology (e.g. opposition to DEI or transgender policies) as the reason for the freeze—not to benefit Trump-owned businesses.

Aug 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Maxwell imprisoned and Babbitt killed – exemplify how white supremacy harms white women, even when white men benefit and evade consequences.
Partially True

Fact Check: Maxwell imprisoned and Babbitt killed – exemplify how white supremacy harms white women, even when white men benefit and evade consequences.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Maxwell imprisoned and Babbitt killed – exemplify how white supremacy harms white women, even when white men benefit and evade consequences.

Aug 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is the Zelenko protocol of benefit for COVIS-19?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is the Zelenko protocol of benefit for COVIS-19?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is the Zelenko protocol of benefit for COVIS-19?

Aug 3, 2025
Read more →