TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Workers with AI skills earn 56% more than those without.

Fact Check: Workers with AI skills earn 56% more than those without.

Published July 1, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
?
VERDICT
Unverified

# Fact Check: "Workers with AI skills earn 56% more than those without." ## What We Know The claim that "workers with AI skills earn 56% more than th...

Fact Check: "Workers with AI skills earn 56% more than those without."

What We Know

The claim that "workers with AI skills earn 56% more than those without" is supported by various reports and studies. According to a PwC report, workers who possess AI skills command a wage premium of 56%. This report highlights the growing demand for AI skills in the job market and indicates that the integration of AI into various sectors is leading to significant changes in job roles and required skills.

Furthermore, a blog post from The Interview Guys also reiterates this statistic, emphasizing that AI skills are increasingly valuable and that approximately 70% of job skills will change by 2030, further underscoring the importance of adapting to new technologies (source-6).

Analysis

While the claim is backed by credible sources, it is essential to evaluate the context and methodology behind these statistics. The PwC report is a comprehensive analysis based on labor market trends and projections, which lends it a degree of reliability. However, it is crucial to consider how the data was collected and whether it represents a broad spectrum of industries and job roles.

The blog post from The Interview Guys, while informative, may not provide the same level of rigorous analysis as the PwC report. It is essential to note that blog posts can sometimes lack the depth of peer-reviewed research or comprehensive market studies. Therefore, while the claim is presented as a fact, the context in which these statistics were derived should be carefully considered.

Moreover, the wage premium of 56% could vary significantly across different sectors, regions, and job levels. For instance, tech-related roles may see higher premiums compared to other industries where AI integration is less pronounced. This variability is not addressed in the sources provided, which could lead to misinterpretation of the claim's applicability across the job market.

Conclusion

Verdict: Unverified
While the claim that workers with AI skills earn 56% more than those without is supported by credible sources, the context and variability of this statistic necessitate further investigation. The reliability of the claim hinges on the specifics of the data collection and the sectors analyzed. Without additional context or comprehensive studies that explore these nuances, the claim remains unverified.

Sources

  1. What is AI, and how do programmes like ChatGPT and DeepSeek …
  2. Artificial intelligence - Wikipedia
  3. OpenAI
  4. The Fearless Future: 2025 Global AI Jobs Barometer - PwC
  5. What is AI - DeepAI
  6. Workers With AI Skills Earn 56% More — Here's Why 70% ...
  7. Google AI – Our AI Journey
  8. PwC 2025 Global AI Jobs Barometer

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Most job gains under Biden administration went to foreign workers, not Americans.
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Most job gains under Biden administration went to foreign workers, not Americans.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Most job gains under Biden administration went to foreign workers, not Americans.

Jul 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: America's economic system is rigged against workers and in favor of investors.
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: America's economic system is rigged against workers and in favor of investors.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: America's economic system is rigged against workers and in favor of investors.

Jul 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Over 60 percent of the workforce at some local McDonald's are temporary foreign workers.
Unverified

Fact Check: Over 60 percent of the workforce at some local McDonald's are temporary foreign workers.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Over 60 percent of the workforce at some local McDonald's are temporary foreign workers.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Temporary foreign workers can only stay for one year under new policies.
Unverified

Fact Check: Temporary foreign workers can only stay for one year under new policies.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Temporary foreign workers can only stay for one year under new policies.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Between 15 to 20 percent of crop production workers are undocumented immigrants.
Unverified

Fact Check: Between 15 to 20 percent of crop production workers are undocumented immigrants.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Between 15 to 20 percent of crop production workers are undocumented immigrants.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks