TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Workers in the Ivory Coast told Reuters they had asked Unilever to guarantee the same conditions, including severance pay, for two years.

Fact Check: Workers in the Ivory Coast told Reuters they had asked Unilever to guarantee the same conditions, including severance pay, for two years.

Published June 14, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: Workers in the Ivory Coast told Reuters they had asked Unilever to guarantee the same conditions, including severance pay, for two years...

Fact Check: Workers in the Ivory Coast told Reuters they had asked Unilever to guarantee the same conditions, including severance pay, for two years.

What We Know

Recent reports indicate that workers in the Ivory Coast have expressed concerns regarding their employment conditions with Unilever. According to a Reuters article, these workers have indeed asked Unilever to guarantee the same employment conditions, including severance pay, for a duration of two years. This request comes amid allegations that Unilever is violating their collective bargaining agreement, particularly in light of a potential sale of its local unit. The workers claim that the company is not upholding its commitments regarding severance pay and other rights as stipulated in their agreements.

Additional sources, such as Yahoo Finance, corroborate this claim, stating that the workers are asserting that Unilever is failing to honor their collective bargaining rights. The situation has sparked protests and demands for better conditions, with workers emphasizing the need for guarantees regarding severance pay in the event of layoffs.

Analysis

The claim that workers in the Ivory Coast have asked Unilever for guarantees regarding their employment conditions is supported by multiple credible sources. The original report from Reuters is a reputable news organization known for its journalistic integrity, which adds credibility to the claims made by the workers. The report details the workers' grievances and their requests for assurances from Unilever, aligning with the statements made by the workers themselves.

However, it is important to assess the context and potential biases in the reporting. While Reuters provides a detailed account, the situation is complex, involving labor rights, corporate practices, and economic conditions in the Ivory Coast. Other sources, such as Sputnik News and The Workers Rights, also highlight the workers' claims but may have varying degrees of reliability based on their editorial standards and potential biases. For instance, while Sputnik News is known for its state-sponsored narratives, The Workers Rights focuses specifically on labor issues, which could provide a more nuanced perspective on the workers' rights.

The reports indicate that Unilever's severance pay policies may not align with local labor laws, further complicating the situation. This discrepancy raises questions about the adequacy of protections for workers in the context of corporate restructuring, as noted in various articles, including Moomoo.

Conclusion

Needs Research. While the claim that workers in the Ivory Coast have asked Unilever for guarantees regarding their employment conditions is substantiated by credible sources, the broader context of labor rights, corporate responsibilities, and local laws requires further investigation. The complexity of the situation, including potential discrepancies between Unilever's practices and local labor regulations, necessitates a deeper exploration of the claims made by the workers and the company's response.

Sources

  1. Exclusive: Ivory Coast workers say Unilever is violating ...
  2. Exclusive-Ivory Coast workers say Unilever is violating ...
  3. Exclusive-Ivory Coast workers say Unilever is violating their union rights...
  4. Reuters Africa - X
  5. Unilever weakens Ivory Coast workers' protections amid ...
  6. Cote d'Ivoire Workers Reportedly Slam Unilever Over ...
  7. Market Chatter: Unilever Workers in Ivory Coast Protest ...
  8. Ivory Coast Workers Accuse Unilever of Union Rights Violations

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 200 United Nations workers have died in Gaza while trying to distribute fooda record toll for UN personnel in any conflict.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: 200 United Nations workers have died in Gaza while trying to distribute fooda record toll for UN personnel in any conflict.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 200 United Nations workers have died in Gaza while trying to distribute fooda record toll for UN personnel in any conflict.

Aug 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Griffin reacts to podcaster Joe Rogan calling Pres. Trump's deportation policies targeting migrant workers "insane."
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Griffin reacts to podcaster Joe Rogan calling Pres. Trump's deportation policies targeting migrant workers "insane."

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Griffin reacts to podcaster Joe Rogan calling Pres. Trump's deportation policies targeting migrant workers "insane."

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Masked ICE goons raid Ventura County Farm in California. KTLA reporter: "It's gonna be at least 100 workers being detained, maybe even a couple of hundred."
Partially True

Fact Check: Masked ICE goons raid Ventura County Farm in California. KTLA reporter: "It's gonna be at least 100 workers being detained, maybe even a couple of hundred."

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Masked ICE goons raid Ventura County Farm in California. KTLA reporter: "It's gonna be at least 100 workers being detained, maybe even a couple of hundred."

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Hundreds of farm workers grabbed by Trump’s Gestapo in California
Partially True

Fact Check: Hundreds of farm workers grabbed by Trump’s Gestapo in California

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Hundreds of farm workers grabbed by Trump’s Gestapo in California

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump's administration will not provide amnesty for migrant farm workers.
True

Fact Check: Trump's administration will not provide amnesty for migrant farm workers.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's administration will not provide amnesty for migrant farm workers.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks