TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Workers in the Ivory Coast asked Unilever to guarantee the same conditions, including severance pay, for two years.

Fact Check: Workers in the Ivory Coast asked Unilever to guarantee the same conditions, including severance pay, for two years.

Published June 13, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Workers in the Ivory Coast asked Unilever to guarantee the same conditions, including severance pay, for two years." ## What We Know W...

Fact Check: "Workers in the Ivory Coast asked Unilever to guarantee the same conditions, including severance pay, for two years."

What We Know

Workers at Unilever's Ivory Coast subsidiary have expressed concerns regarding the company's compliance with a longstanding collective bargaining agreement. This agreement stipulates that employees are entitled to severance pay in the event of job losses due to the sale of the company's local operations. The employees have specifically requested that Unilever guarantee these severance conditions for a period of two years following the sale, which is one year less than the protections offered to European workers during a similar restructuring process (Reuters, Yahoo).

Unilever is in the process of selling its shareholding in Unilever Côte d’Ivoire to a local consortium, which has raised fears among employees about potential job losses and the future of their employment conditions. The collective bargaining agreement, reaffirmed in 2007, provides for severance pay of one month's gross salary for each year of service, capped at 18 months, along with up to six months of medical coverage (Southern African Times, Workers Rights). However, Unilever has stated that the collective agreement will no longer apply once the sale is complete, leading to accusations of violation of workers' rights (Reuters, Yahoo).

Analysis

The claim that "workers in the Ivory Coast asked Unilever to guarantee the same conditions, including severance pay, for two years" is supported by multiple sources. Employees have indeed requested that Unilever ensure severance provisions and employment guarantees for two years after the sale, as documented in reports from reputable news outlets like Reuters and Yahoo (Reuters, Yahoo).

The reliability of these sources is high, as they are well-established news organizations known for their journalistic integrity. The reports are corroborated by legal representatives of the workers, who emphasize that the collective bargaining agreement remains valid and that Unilever's refusal to honor it could lead to significant job insecurity (Southern African Times, Workers Rights).

Furthermore, the contrast between the treatment of workers in Europe and those in Ivory Coast has been highlighted, with Unilever providing more generous terms in Europe compared to what is being offered in Ivory Coast. This disparity raises ethical concerns regarding the company's commitment to fair labor practices globally (Reuters, Yahoo).

Conclusion

The claim that workers in the Ivory Coast asked Unilever to guarantee the same conditions, including severance pay, for two years is True. The evidence presented by multiple credible sources confirms that employees have made this request amid concerns over their job security following the sale of the company's local operations. The situation reflects broader issues of labor rights and corporate responsibility, particularly in the context of differing treatment of workers across regions.

Sources

  1. Ivory Coast workers say Unilever is violating their union rights ...
  2. Unilever to guarantee European ice cream workers' ...
  3. Exclusive-Ivory Coast workers say Unilever is violating ...
  4. Exclusive-Ivory Coast workers say Unilever is violating ...
  5. Unilever Faces Accusations of Breaching Severance ...
  6. Ivory Coast Workers Accuse Unilever of Union Rights Violations
  7. Cote d'Ivoire Workers Reportedly Slam Unilever Over ...
  8. Reuters Africa - X

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Griffin reacts to podcaster Joe Rogan calling Pres. Trump's deportation policies targeting migrant workers "insane."
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Griffin reacts to podcaster Joe Rogan calling Pres. Trump's deportation policies targeting migrant workers "insane."

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Griffin reacts to podcaster Joe Rogan calling Pres. Trump's deportation policies targeting migrant workers "insane."

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump's administration will not provide amnesty for migrant farm workers.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump's administration will not provide amnesty for migrant farm workers.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's administration will not provide amnesty for migrant farm workers.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Farm workers are excluded from basic child labor laws in the United States.
True

Fact Check: Farm workers are excluded from basic child labor laws in the United States.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Farm workers are excluded from basic child labor laws in the United States.

Jul 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: ICE is profiling immigrant workers based on their appearance and ethnicity.
True

Fact Check: ICE is profiling immigrant workers based on their appearance and ethnicity.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: ICE is profiling immigrant workers based on their appearance and ethnicity.

Jul 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Amnesty International oppose nordic model when came of human rights of Sex workers
True

Fact Check: Amnesty International oppose nordic model when came of human rights of Sex workers

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Amnesty International oppose nordic model when came of human rights of Sex workers

Jul 5, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks