TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: why does trump blame zelenski for the war

Fact Check: why does trump blame zelenski for the war

Published May 27, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✗
VERDICT
False

# Why Does Trump Blame Zelensky for the War? ## Introduction Recently, former President Donald Trump has made statements suggesting that Ukrainian Pr...

Why Does Trump Blame Zelensky for the War?

Introduction

Recently, former President Donald Trump has made statements suggesting that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is to blame for the ongoing war in Ukraine, which began with Russia's invasion in 2014 and escalated with a full-scale invasion in 2022. Trump's comments have sparked significant debate and controversy, particularly regarding their accuracy and the implications for U.S. foreign policy. This article will explore the context of Trump's claims, the reactions they have provoked, and the broader implications for the understanding of the conflict.

What We Know

  1. Historical Context: The war in Ukraine began when Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 and has involved ongoing conflict in Eastern Ukraine. The situation escalated with Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022 14.

  2. Trump's Claims: Trump has publicly stated that Zelensky and Ukraine share responsibility for the war. He has suggested that Ukraine had opportunities to prevent the conflict and has criticized Zelensky's leadership, claiming that his approval ratings have plummeted 26.

  3. Reactions from Zelensky: In response to Trump's comments, Zelensky has pushed back, asserting that such statements are disinformation that align with Kremlin narratives. He emphasized the need for accurate representation of the war's origins 79.

  4. Media Coverage: Various media outlets have fact-checked Trump's assertions, noting that they contradict established historical facts regarding the initiation of the conflict. They emphasize that the war began with Russian aggression, not Ukrainian actions 3510.

Analysis

The reliability of Trump's claims can be evaluated through several lenses:

  • Source Credibility: The sources reporting on Trump's statements include established news organizations such as AP News, BBC, The New York Times, and NPR. These outlets generally adhere to journalistic standards, but they may also have editorial biases. For instance, The New York Times and NPR have been criticized for their liberal leanings, which could influence their framing of Trump's comments 137.

  • Historical Accuracy: Trump's assertion that Ukraine is to blame for the war has been widely disputed. Historical accounts consistently indicate that the conflict was initiated by Russia's military actions. For example, the BBC and Reuters explicitly state that Russia invaded Ukraine first, contradicting Trump's narrative 46.

  • Potential Conflicts of Interest: Trump's comments may reflect a political strategy aimed at reshaping U.S. foreign policy towards Ukraine, especially as he positions himself for a potential presidential run. His framing of the narrative could appeal to certain voter bases that are skeptical of U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts 910.

  • Methodological Concerns: Trump's claims lack substantiation from credible evidence. The suggestion that Ukraine had opportunities to prevent the war is vague and does not account for the complexities of international relations and military aggression. A more detailed analysis of diplomatic communications and military actions would be necessary to assess these claims accurately.

Conclusion

Verdict: False

The assertion that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is to blame for the war in Ukraine is false. Key evidence supporting this conclusion includes the historical context of the conflict, which clearly indicates that the war was initiated by Russian aggression, not Ukrainian actions. Multiple reputable media outlets have fact-checked Trump's claims and found them to contradict established facts regarding the origins of the war.

It is important to note that while Trump's comments may reflect a particular political narrative, they do not align with the consensus of historical accounts or the perspectives of those directly involved in the conflict. The complexity of international relations and the nuances of military aggression are often oversimplified in political rhetoric, which can lead to misleading interpretations.

However, it is essential to acknowledge the limitations in the available evidence. The political landscape is dynamic, and interpretations of events can vary based on new developments or shifts in public opinion. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider multiple perspectives when assessing claims related to complex geopolitical issues.

Sources

  1. AP News. "Trump says Ukraine started the war that's killing its citizens. What are the facts?" AP News
  2. BBC. "Fact-checking Donald Trump's claims about war in Ukraine." BBC
  3. The New York Times. "Trump Falsely Suggests Ukraine Is to Blame for the War: What to Know." The New York Times
  4. BBC. "Trump blames Zelensky for starting war day after massive Russian attack." BBC
  5. The New York Times. "Trump Flips the Script on the Ukraine War, Blaming Zelensky Not Putin." The New York Times
  6. Reuters. "Trump blames Ukraine's Zelenskiy for starting war with Russia." Reuters
  7. NPR. "Zelenskyy hits back against Trump's comments blaming Ukraine for the war with Russia." NPR
  8. The New York Times. "In Rambling Interview, Trump Blames Zelensky, Not Putin, for Ukraine War." The New York Times
  9. NPR. "In major U.S. reversal, Trump sees Ukraine, Zelenskyy to blame for war with Russia." NPR
  10. USA Today. "'Everybody's to blame': Trump accuses Zelenskyy of starting Russia's war on Ukraine." USA Today

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I'm Christy Nome here in Texas with my boots on the ground after this devastating tragedy that was absolutely not preventable and we are in no way responsible for it after visiting here I recently found out that Habius Corpus is the name of a city here in Texas and is in fact not a legal term which means the president can do whatever he wants. I have been told by some people that in addition to being the Secretary of Homeland Security that does also make me the head of Fema Fema sounds like female or feminism and that's DEI and 00:34 I don't believe in that. President Trump has entrusted me to be in charge of Fema which is not a federal emergency management agency. In fact, all emergencies are actually being managed by the state and the reason why I am here is to make sure to get some good film for my B roll. It is completely disgusting that there are people out there who are trying to politicize the devastation that happened here in Texas and I would like to remind everyone that it is only okay to politicize natural disasters when they happen in 01:04 blue states.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I'm Christy Nome here in Texas with my boots on the ground after this devastating tragedy that was absolutely not preventable and we are in no way responsible for it after visiting here I recently found out that Habius Corpus is the name of a city here in Texas and is in fact not a legal term which means the president can do whatever he wants. I have been told by some people that in addition to being the Secretary of Homeland Security that does also make me the head of Fema Fema sounds like female or feminism and that's DEI and 00:34 I don't believe in that. President Trump has entrusted me to be in charge of Fema which is not a federal emergency management agency. In fact, all emergencies are actually being managed by the state and the reason why I am here is to make sure to get some good film for my B roll. It is completely disgusting that there are people out there who are trying to politicize the devastation that happened here in Texas and I would like to remind everyone that it is only okay to politicize natural disasters when they happen in 01:04 blue states.

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Are Trump's approval ratings in the tank? Let's check it out. I mean every politician would like this number here especially to see it go up. How about compared to other presidents who are Republicans? Yeah. It's history making. It's history making. What are we talking about here? So why don't we look back? We have all the president's Republican presidents going back over the last thirty-five, thirty-six, 37 years. What are we talking about? GOP who strongly approved 5 months in. Look at this. George, HW Bush, Bush forty1, 46%. Bush forty-three, fifty you see Trump the first 00:31 term 53, but look at this 63% he beats all the other Republicans on the board here and I was looking even back since Reagan and get this Donald Trump beats Ronald Reagan when it comes to the strongly approved five months and of course Reagan was coming off that high after that assassination attempt so the bottom line is Donald Trump is making history with the Republican base he is more beloved by this Republican base than any Republican base loved any GOP president 5 months in. It is history making. Even CNN 01:03 is telling the truth. Feels like hell might be freezing over.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Are Trump's approval ratings in the tank? Let's check it out. I mean every politician would like this number here especially to see it go up. How about compared to other presidents who are Republicans? Yeah. It's history making. It's history making. What are we talking about here? So why don't we look back? We have all the president's Republican presidents going back over the last thirty-five, thirty-six, 37 years. What are we talking about? GOP who strongly approved 5 months in. Look at this. George, HW Bush, Bush forty1, 46%. Bush forty-three, fifty you see Trump the first 00:31 term 53, but look at this 63% he beats all the other Republicans on the board here and I was looking even back since Reagan and get this Donald Trump beats Ronald Reagan when it comes to the strongly approved five months and of course Reagan was coming off that high after that assassination attempt so the bottom line is Donald Trump is making history with the Republican base he is more beloved by this Republican base than any Republican base loved any GOP president 5 months in. It is history making. Even CNN 01:03 is telling the truth. Feels like hell might be freezing over.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 Are Trump's approval ratings in the tank? Let's check it out. I mean every politician would like this number here especially to see it go up. How about compared to other presidents who are Republicans? Yeah. It's history making. It's history making. What are we talking about here? So why don't we look back? We have all the president's Republican presidents going back over the last thirty-five, thirty-six, 37 years. What are we talking about? GOP who strongly approved 5 months in. Look at this. George, HW Bush, Bush forty1, 46%. Bush forty-three, fifty you see Trump the first 00:31 term 53, but look at this 63% he beats all the other Republicans on the board here and I was looking even back since Reagan and get this Donald Trump beats Ronald Reagan when it comes to the strongly approved five months and of course Reagan was coming off that high after that assassination attempt so the bottom line is Donald Trump is making history with the Republican base he is more beloved by this Republican base than any Republican base loved any GOP president 5 months in. It is history making. Even CNN 01:03 is telling the truth. Feels like hell might be freezing over.

Aug 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The sole goal of this administration is to prevent the release of these files, which is why Trump has leaned on Republicans in Congress to block the release of the files five times. It's why Trump conspired with Pam Bondi to cook up this plan to pivot to grand jury testimonies instead of releasing the information she already has at her disposal. If Trump was orchestrating a cover up, there is quite literally nothing he would do differently than what he's doing right now."
Unverified

Fact Check: The sole goal of this administration is to prevent the release of these files, which is why Trump has leaned on Republicans in Congress to block the release of the files five times. It's why Trump conspired with Pam Bondi to cook up this plan to pivot to grand jury testimonies instead of releasing the information she already has at her disposal. If Trump was orchestrating a cover up, there is quite literally nothing he would do differently than what he's doing right now."

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The sole goal of this administration is to prevent the release of these files, which is why Trump has leaned on Republicans in Congress to block the release of the files five times. It's why Trump conspired with Pam Bondi to cook up this plan to pivot to grand jury testimonies instead of releasing the information she already has at her disposal. If Trump was orchestrating a cover up, there is quite literally nothing he would do differently than what he's doing right now."

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: HOLY SHIT: Content In Review Let's EFFING go!!!!!!! OC <redacted_social_handle> Mike Pence just TORCHED Trump on Epstein: "Release ALL the files" "I know of no reason why this administration, once the victims' names are protected, should not release all the files." Protect victims. EXPOSE the accomplices. Release the files!!
True

Fact Check: HOLY SHIT: Content In Review Let's EFFING go!!!!!!! OC <redacted_social_handle> Mike Pence just TORCHED Trump on Epstein: "Release ALL the files" "I know of no reason why this administration, once the victims' names are protected, should not release all the files." Protect victims. EXPOSE the accomplices. Release the files!!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: HOLY SHIT: Content In Review Let's EFFING go!!!!!!! OC <redacted_social_handle> Mike Pence just TORCHED Trump on Epstein: "Release ALL the files" "I know of no reason why this administration, once the victims' names are protected, should not release all the files." Protect victims. EXPOSE the accomplices. Release the files!!

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: "Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?" The Epstein records were sealed by a judge until after Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. They weren't unsealed until January 2024. So no, Biden couldn't release what wasn't legally available. Biden didn't run a cult. He He let the DOJ operate independently y-unlike Trump, who demands loyalty oaths and treats every agency like his personal operatives. And no Democrat ran on a platform promising to release the Epstein files. Trump did. Then blocked them.
True

Fact Check: "Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?" The Epstein records were sealed by a judge until after Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. They weren't unsealed until January 2024. So no, Biden couldn't release what wasn't legally available. Biden didn't run a cult. He He let the DOJ operate independently y-unlike Trump, who demands loyalty oaths and treats every agency like his personal operatives. And no Democrat ran on a platform promising to release the Epstein files. Trump did. Then blocked them.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: "Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?" The Epstein records were sealed by a judge until after Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. They weren't unsealed until January 2024. So no, Biden couldn't release what wasn't legally available. Biden didn't run a cult. He He let the DOJ operate independently y-unlike Trump, who demands loyalty oaths and treats every agency like his personal operatives. And no Democrat ran on a platform promising to release the Epstein files. Trump did. Then blocked them.

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: why does trump blame zelenski for the war | TruthOrFake Blog