Fact Check: Where is the judicial warrant for Brad Lander's detention?

Fact Check: Where is the judicial warrant for Brad Lander's detention?

Published June 18, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "Where is the judicial warrant for Brad Lander's detention?" ## What We Know On June 17, 2025, Brad Lander, the New York City Comptroll...

Fact Check: "Where is the judicial warrant for Brad Lander's detention?"

What We Know

On June 17, 2025, Brad Lander, the New York City Comptroller and a Democratic mayoral candidate, was arrested by federal agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) at an immigration court in Manhattan. Lander was attempting to assist a migrant whom authorities were trying to detain. During the incident, he reportedly linked arms with the individual and demanded to see a judicial warrant for the arrest, repeatedly asking, "Where is the warrant?" (AP News, New York Times).

Lander was held for several hours before being released, and the U.S. Attorney's Office indicated that they were investigating his actions to determine if charges would be filed (Washington Post). The Department of Homeland Security later stated that Lander was arrested for "assaulting law enforcement and impeding a federal officer" (BBC).

Importantly, immigration agents do not require a judicial warrant to make arrests in immigration court, as these locations are considered public spaces (New York Times).

Analysis

The claim regarding the lack of a judicial warrant for Lander's detention is partially true. While Lander's demand for a warrant highlights his stance on the legality of the arrest, the fact remains that ICE agents are not legally obligated to present a judicial warrant when making arrests in immigration court settings. This legal framework is crucial to understanding the context of Lander's actions and the subsequent arrest (New York Times, Washington Post).

Lander's insistence on seeing a warrant can be interpreted as a political statement against the practices of ICE under the Trump administration, which has faced criticism for its aggressive immigration enforcement strategies. His actions were part of a broader pattern of confrontations between federal agents and Democratic politicians opposing these policies (AP News, Reuters).

The sources reporting on this incident vary in their framing. Mainstream outlets like the AP and New York Times focus on the factual events surrounding the arrest, while others, such as the Prospect, emphasize the political implications and the context of increasing tensions between federal law enforcement and local officials (Prospect).

Conclusion

The claim "Where is the judicial warrant for Brad Lander's detention?" is Partially True. While Lander's demand for a warrant reflects his legal and ethical concerns regarding the treatment of immigrants and the authority of ICE, it is important to note that ICE agents are not required to present a judicial warrant in immigration court. Thus, while Lander's actions were legally questionable, they were not necessarily unlawful under the specific circumstances of the arrest.

Sources

  1. Brad Lander, NYC mayoral candidate, arrested at ...
  2. Brad Lander Is Arrested by ICE Agents at Immigration ...
  3. NYC comptroller detained by federal agents at immigration ...
  4. NYC mayoral candidate Brad Lander arrested by ICE
  5. NYC mayoral candidate Brad Lander released after ...
  6. Why was NYC Comptroller, mayoral candidate Brad Lander arrested by …
  7. New York City Comptroller Brad Lander released after his ...
  8. NYC Mayoral Candidate Brad Lander Latest Victim of ICE ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: House Republicans just shut down half the legislative branch because they’re afraid of the Epstein files.

The Senate still has no clue about a Trump judicial nominee’s involvement in the cover up.

Emil Bove was in senior leadership at DOJ when the files were reviewed.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: House Republicans just shut down half the legislative branch because they’re afraid of the Epstein files. The Senate still has no clue about a Trump judicial nominee’s involvement in the cover up. Emil Bove was in senior leadership at DOJ when the files were reviewed.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: House Republicans just shut down half the legislative branch because they’re afraid of the Epstein files. The Senate still has no clue about a Trump judicial nominee’s involvement in the cover up. Emil Bove was in senior leadership at DOJ when the files were reviewed.

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Violent crime rates can influence sentencing decisions in the U.S. judicial system.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Violent crime rates can influence sentencing decisions in the U.S. judicial system.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Violent crime rates can influence sentencing decisions in the U.S. judicial system.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Impeachment is not an appropriate response to judicial decisions.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Impeachment is not an appropriate response to judicial decisions.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Impeachment is not an appropriate response to judicial decisions.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Emil Bove encouraged attorneys to disregard judicial authority.
True

Fact Check: Emil Bove encouraged attorneys to disregard judicial authority.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Emil Bove encouraged attorneys to disregard judicial authority.

Jul 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The U.S. has three branches of government: executive, legislative, and judicial.
Unverified

Fact Check: The U.S. has three branches of government: executive, legislative, and judicial.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The U.S. has three branches of government: executive, legislative, and judicial.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The U.S. judicial system allows for appeals in immigration proceedings.
Unverified

Fact Check: The U.S. judicial system allows for appeals in immigration proceedings.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The U.S. judicial system allows for appeals in immigration proceedings.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →