Fact Check: When a Muslim man kills his wife or daughter it is labeled as an honor killing, part of his "
culture" When it is others, especially whites, it is labeled "a crime of passion," an "isolated incident," a "break in mental health." This is manufactured to portray Muslims in an exaggerated way.

Fact Check: When a Muslim man kills his wife or daughter it is labeled as an honor killing, part of his " culture" When it is others, especially whites, it is labeled "a crime of passion," an "isolated incident," a "break in mental health." This is manufactured to portray Muslims in an exaggerated way.

Published July 7, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "When a Muslim man kills his wife or daughter it is labeled as an honor killing, part of his 'culture'..." ## What We Know The claim su...

Fact Check: "When a Muslim man kills his wife or daughter it is labeled as an honor killing, part of his 'culture'..."

What We Know

The claim suggests a disparity in the labeling of violent acts based on the cultural background of the perpetrator. Specifically, it argues that when a Muslim man commits violence against female family members, it is categorized as an "honor killing," whereas similar acts by individuals from other backgrounds, particularly white individuals, are labeled as "crimes of passion" or "isolated incidents" linked to mental health issues.

Honor killings are defined as violent acts committed to restore family honor, often targeting women who are perceived to have violated social or sexual norms (source-1). These acts are prevalent in certain cultures, particularly in parts of the Middle East and South Asia, where patriarchal norms dictate strict codes of female behavior (source-2). The World Health Organization estimates that around 5,000 honor killings occur annually worldwide (source-1).

Conversely, "crimes of passion" typically refer to acts of violence committed in a moment of emotional turmoil, often involving intimate partners. These incidents are frequently contextualized within the framework of individual psychological issues rather than cultural practices (source-6).

Analysis

The assertion that honor killings are predominantly associated with Muslim culture while other violent acts are framed differently is supported by sociological observations. Honor killings are indeed often linked to cultural practices that prioritize family honor over individual rights, particularly in patriarchal societies (source-1).

However, the framing of "crimes of passion" as isolated incidents is also a simplification. Such crimes can be influenced by broader societal norms and expectations, including those surrounding masculinity and emotional expression (source-6). The distinction between these types of violence may reflect underlying biases in media reporting and societal perceptions, which can vary significantly across different cultural contexts (source-7).

While there is a tendency to label acts of violence differently based on cultural context, it is crucial to recognize that both honor killings and crimes of passion stem from complex social dynamics. The claim's assertion that this disparity is "manufactured" to exaggerate perceptions of Muslims may overlook the genuine cultural factors that contribute to honor killings, while also acknowledging that media narratives can skew public perception (source-2).

Conclusion

The claim is Partially True. It accurately highlights the disparity in how violent acts are labeled based on cultural context, particularly the distinction between honor killings and crimes of passion. However, it oversimplifies the complexities surrounding these classifications and the cultural factors at play. While there is a bias in media portrayal, the existence of honor killings as a culturally specific phenomenon cannot be dismissed.

Sources

  1. Honor Killings in the Eastern Mediterranean Region
  2. Honor Killings, Illicit Sex, and Islamic Law | Muslim Sexual Ethics
  3. Honor killing - Wikipedia
  4. Honor killings by region - Wikipedia
  5. Honor Killing: Overview
  6. Preliminary Examination of so-called Honour Killings in Canada
  7. Making Sense of Honor Killings - Ozan Aksoy, Aron
  8. Honor-related Violence in the Context of Patriarchy

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: DENMARK BANS THE BURQA AND TELLS MUSLIMS TO ADJUST TO THEIR CUL CULTURE AND RULES, FACE LEGAL ISSUES, OR LEAVE THEIR COUNTRY
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: DENMARK BANS THE BURQA AND TELLS MUSLIMS TO ADJUST TO THEIR CUL CULTURE AND RULES, FACE LEGAL ISSUES, OR LEAVE THEIR COUNTRY

Detailed fact-check analysis of: DENMARK BANS THE BURQA AND TELLS MUSLIMS TO ADJUST TO THEIR CUL CULTURE AND RULES, FACE LEGAL ISSUES, OR LEAVE THEIR COUNTRY

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Was Jesus a Muslim
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Was Jesus a Muslim

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Was Jesus a Muslim

Aug 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: A deportation drive targeting India’s Muslim minority was marked by mass home demolitions, arbitrary detentions, allegations of beatings and a lack of due process, according to interviews with Bangladeshi officials and more than 50 people swept up in the pursuit, as well as a Post review of government data, court documents and video footage.
Partially True

Fact Check: A deportation drive targeting India’s Muslim minority was marked by mass home demolitions, arbitrary detentions, allegations of beatings and a lack of due process, according to interviews with Bangladeshi officials and more than 50 people swept up in the pursuit, as well as a Post review of government data, court documents and video footage.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: A deportation drive targeting India’s Muslim minority was marked by mass home demolitions, arbitrary detentions, allegations of beatings and a lack of due process, according to interviews with Bangladeshi officials and more than 50 people swept up in the pursuit, as well as a Post review of government data, court documents and video footage.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Mcdonalds lose money in certain predominantly Muslim countries
Partially True

Fact Check: Mcdonalds lose money in certain predominantly Muslim countries

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Mcdonalds lose money in certain predominantly Muslim countries

Jul 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Imam Mohammad Tawhidi explains why radical Muslims consistently align with and vote for the Left
Partially True

Fact Check: Imam Mohammad Tawhidi explains why radical Muslims consistently align with and vote for the Left

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Imam Mohammad Tawhidi explains why radical Muslims consistently align with and vote for the Left

Jul 5, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: When a Muslim man kills his wife or daughter it is labeled as an honor killing, part of his " culture" When it is others, especially whites, it is labeled "a crime of passion," an "isolated incident," a "break in mental health." This is manufactured to portray Muslims in an exaggerated way. | TruthOrFake Blog