TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: What’s the side between gaza and Israel war and Russia and Ukraine war?

Fact Check: What’s the side between gaza and Israel war and Russia and Ukraine war?

March 19, 2025•by TruthOrFake
?
VERDICT
Unverified

# The Claim: "What’s the side between Gaza and Israel war and Russia and Ukraine war?" ## Introduction The claim seeks to explore the relationship an...

The Claim: "What’s the side between Gaza and Israel war and Russia and Ukraine war?"

Introduction

The claim seeks to explore the relationship and differences between the ongoing conflicts in Gaza and Israel and the war in Ukraine against Russia. This inquiry touches on geopolitical implications, humanitarian concerns, and the broader international response to both conflicts. The complexity of these wars raises questions about their nature, the actors involved, and the lessons that can be drawn from them.

What We Know

  1. Nature of Conflicts: The conflict in Ukraine is characterized as a conventional war between two states, with Ukraine defending its sovereignty against Russian aggression. In contrast, the Gaza conflict involves asymmetric warfare, where Israel, a state military, confronts Hamas, which is classified as a terrorist organization by many countries, including the U.S. 13.

  2. Geopolitical Implications: The Gaza conflict has been noted to influence geopolitical dynamics that affect Ukraine's position. For instance, the ongoing violence in Gaza complicates the international community's response to the war in Ukraine, particularly regarding U.S. support for Ukraine 23.

  3. Humanitarian Impact: Reports indicate that the humanitarian toll in Gaza, particularly among women and children, is significantly higher than that in Ukraine, with one source claiming the death toll for these demographics in Gaza is six times greater than in Ukraine 10. This raises questions about the international community's response and prioritization of humanitarian aid.

  4. Perceptions and Propaganda: The conflicts are also used in propaganda by various actors. For example, some analyses suggest that Russia views the situation in Gaza as a validation of its own actions in Ukraine, framing both conflicts within a narrative of Western hypocrisy 89.

  5. Public and Political Reactions: The wars have elicited varied responses from global leaders and the public, often reflecting existing biases and political agendas. This has led to selective humanitarian responses and differing levels of media coverage 45.

Analysis

Evaluating the sources reveals a mix of credible analyses and potential biases:

  • Credibility of Sources: The Washington Post 1 and the U.S. Institute of Peace 3 are generally considered reliable sources, known for their journalistic standards and fact-checking protocols. The International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) 2 also has a reputation for providing in-depth geopolitical analyses.

  • Potential Biases: Some sources, such as the Carnegie Endowment 8 and the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) 9, may carry biases based on their geopolitical perspectives or affiliations. For example, RUSI's commentary may reflect a Western-centric viewpoint that could influence its analysis of the conflicts.

  • Methodological Concerns: The claim regarding the death toll of women and children in Gaza compared to Ukraine 10 requires scrutiny regarding how these figures were obtained and reported. The context of civilian casualties in warfare is complex and often politicized, necessitating careful examination of the data sources and definitions used.

  • Conflicting Narratives: The framing of the conflicts varies significantly across sources. For instance, one article argues that comparing the two wars oversimplifies the unique historical and political contexts of each 5. This highlights the importance of understanding the distinct narratives that shape public perception.

Conclusion

Verdict: Unverified

The evidence surrounding the claim that there are significant parallels or lessons to be drawn between the conflicts in Gaza and Israel and the war in Ukraine remains unverified. Key points of consideration include the distinct nature of each conflict, with Ukraine engaged in a conventional war and Gaza experiencing asymmetric warfare. While some sources suggest geopolitical implications and humanitarian disparities, the reliability of these claims is mixed, with potential biases and methodological concerns evident in the data presented.

The complexity of both conflicts, along with the varying narratives and interpretations from different sources, contributes to the uncertainty surrounding this claim. It is crucial to recognize that the information available is often politicized and may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the situations at hand.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the information presented and consider the limitations of the evidence before forming conclusions about the relationships between these two significant geopolitical conflicts.

Sources

  1. Washington Post. "Gaza and Ukraine are very different wars, but they teach ...". Link
  2. International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). "Ukraine vs Gaza". Link
  3. U.S. Institute of Peace. "How Does the Israel-Hamas War Impact Russia and Ukraine?". Link
  4. Alternatives Humanitaires. "Ukraine-Palestine: a comparative anatomy of selective ...". Link
  5. Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. "How the Russia-Ukraine War and the Israeli-Palestinian ...". Link
  6. Journal of Business Management and International Journal. "Analysing and Synthesizing the Effects of Conflict: A ...". Link
  7. CNN. "Analysis: In Ukraine and Gaza, Trump finds out that ending ...". Link
  8. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "The Gaza War Has Convinced Russia It Was Right All Along". Link
  9. Royal United Services Institute (RUSI). "Two Wars, One Common Denominator: Russia and the Israel–Gaza ...". Link
  10. Anadolu Agency. "Children, women death toll in Israel war on Gaza 6 times ...". Link

Got your own claim to verify? It's 100% Free!

Join thousands who trust our AI-powered fact-checking. Completely free with no registration required. Your claim could be the next important truth we uncover.

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: What’s the difference between gaza and Israel war and Russia and Ukraine war?
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: What’s the difference between gaza and Israel war and Russia and Ukraine war?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: What’s the difference between gaza and Israel war and Russia and Ukraine war?

Mar 19, 2025
Read more →
🔍
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Exposed: FBI in Emergency Operation to Protect Epstein’s Elite Pedophile Network — Over 1,000 Agents Reassigned to Bury the Truth Before Trump Releases the Bombshell Files! The FBI has officially declared war on truth. What’s happening in their New York office isn’t justice — it’s a high-level operation to protect child traffickers in suits, crowns, and boardrooms. Trump is forcing their hand. He holds the full list — unredacted. And now, over 1,000 FBI agents have been pulled from national security to do one thing: scrub the Epstein files before they go public. Think about that. While cartels flood the border, foreign threats rise, and Americans suffer — the FBI is pulling 12-hour overnight shifts to protect rapists of children. They're not investigating — they’re sanitizing evidence to keep the power structure intact. This is a deep state firewall operation. Agents have been ordered to redact victims’ info — but leave Epstein’s associates untouched. The monsters stay anonymous. The system stays safe. It’s not a mistake. It’s a plan. This isn’t about Epstein. It never was. This is about the ones he served — the shadow government. The ones who blackmailed politicians, compromised world leaders, and used Epstein’s island as a trap. The names in those files could shatter the global order. Judges. Tech CEOs. Media puppeteers. Royals. Intelligence assets. Trump isn’t playing their game anymore. He forced the release of JFK files last week — fully unredacted. He knows it’s all connected: JFK, MLK, Epstein. All silenced by the same machine. And now the machine is glitching. FBI’s NY field director James Dennehy was forced to resign days after the exposure. He didn’t “retire.” He was pushed out. The house of cards is falling, and Trump is pulling the thread. Pam Bondi promised transparency. She delivered lies. But she accidentally admitted it: SDNY is hiding thousands more Epstein files. The same courts that protected Epstein are still protecting the network. But Trump already has everything. That’s why they’re panicking. That’s why agents are sleeping in the office. Not to save you — to save the elites. The redactions mean nothing. The real files are coming. And when they hit — it won’t just expose Epstein. It will expose the entire shadow empire: banks, royalty, Hollywood, Big Pharma, the Vatican. This is the collapse. Trump broke the firewall. They can’t stop what’s coming. Tick-tock.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Exposed: FBI in Emergency Operation to Protect Epstein’s Elite Pedophile Network — Over 1,000 Agents...

Apr 10, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: How nuts is Mark Carney? Perhaps nuttier than you think. Have a read of this piece in the Financial Post, by Matthew Lau. "Having left his gig as UN Special Envoy for Climate and Finance to lead the federal Liberal government, Mark Carney is now in a position to focus his and Greta Thunberg’s global climate crusade squarely on Canada. The crusade, Carney boasted back in 2021 while in his previous role, is worth many trillions of dollars. As he told CBC News at that year’s UN climate conference, “We have banks, asset managers, pension funds, insurance companies from around the world — more than 45 countries — and their total resources, totalling US$130 trillion” dedicated to transitioning the world’s economy away from fossil fuels. That dollar figure is higher than global GDP. Last month, Carney laid out Canada’s required contribution to his climate ambitions: “Canada must invest $2 trillion by 2050 — about $80 billion per year — to become carbon competitive and achieve Net Zero. However, investments in decarbonisation currently run between $10–20 billion annually.” The implication is that another $60-70 billion a year will need to be wrung out of Canadian businesses and consumers, either through direct taxation and government spending or with regulatory browbeating to push Canadians’ savings and investments into global warming initiatives. Carney has made no effort to hide his agenda to browbeat businesses into joining his and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade. In a 2021 interview he declared, “We need a sustainable economy, and is your business aligned with that? Are your hiring practices consistent with that? Are you developing people in a way that’s consistent with that? Ultimately, what’s being asked of businesses when it comes to climate is, do you have a plan for net-zero? Canada has a legislated objective for net zero alongside another 130 countries.” “A Swedish teenager,” Carney continued, referring to Thunberg, “can figure out the carbon budget and that we have less than 10 years and you have to get to net-zero to stabilize it and if you’re a company and you have purpose, well, what’s your plan? And all these plans need to come together.” This is utter insanity: under Justin Trudeau Canada suffered rapidly declining business investment and now his successor wants the country’s business leaders to take financial planning directives from Greta Thunberg. While the federal government barrels down the road to net-zero impoverishment for Canada, everyone else is looking for the exit ramp. In January, six of the largest U.S. banks — JPMorganChase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley — quit the Carney-led net-zero banking alliance. Canada’s Big Six Banks — RBC, TD Bank, BMO, Scotiabank, CIBC and National Bank — have quit the initiative as well. Even Europe is beginning to back off on government piling climate obligations onto businesses in the name of fighting global warming. As the Wall Street Journal reports, the EU is watering down its climate accounting policies “amid pushback from member states and companies within the bloc over the new rules, which they say would have increased costs and reduced the competitiveness of their business.” Specifically, regulations previously scheduled for this year would have forced companies “to report in detail on their environmental, social and corporate-governance performance while making significant cuts to the emissions from within their supply chain.” The EU is now dropping, weakening or postponing many of these climate regulations, so that businesses will be able to better “grow, innovate, and create quality jobs.” This is effectively an admission that piling climate obligations and environmental reporting mandates onto businesses prevents them from growing, innovating and creating good jobs. Unfortunately, Mark Carney is all about climate obligations and reporting mandates. The road Canada is currently marching down for climate-related financial disclosures is based on a framework proposed by a task force Carney initiated in 2015. His aforementioned Thunberg-praising interview was not with an environmental journalist, but with Pivot Magazine, which is published by CPA Canada, the accounting industry’s national association. “We cannot get to net-zero without proper climate reporting,” he insisted, speaking of the need for “one core global standard” for climate accounting and reporting. A global climate reporting standard to help push trillions of dollars — yes, trillions with a “T” — from Canadian workers and taxpayers into Mark Carney and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade? After a decade of Justin Trudeau’s ruinous policies weakening Canada from coast to coast, there could be little worse for the country and its economy than a Liberal government led by Mark Carney." The Financial Post

Detailed fact-check analysis of: How nuts is Mark Carney? Perhaps nuttier than you think. Have a read of this piece in the Financia...

Mar 23, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: the covid vaccine had side effects that are persistent
Partially True

Fact Check: the covid vaccine had side effects that are persistent

Detailed fact-check analysis of: the covid vaccine had side effects that are persistent

May 27, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Mostly False

Fact Check: Conservatives Announce Plan to Protect Canada’s Fisheries After the Lost Liberal Decade, Conservatives will stop the chaos and put Canadian fishers first - for a change. April 16, 2025 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE West Dover, NS — Today, Rick Perkins, Conservative Candidate for South Shore—St. Margarets, and Chris D’Entremont, Conservative Candidate for Acadie-Annapolis, announced the Conservative plan to protect Canadian fisheries. A new Conservative government will put science first, restore law and order and protect harvester rights. Conservatives will restore sustainable fisheries and ensure fairness in Canada’s coastal communities. “During the Lost Liberal Decade, the government has failed Canada’s fish harvesters. They’ve ignored science, weakened enforcement, and stolen quota from law-abiding Canadians,” said Perkins. “Now they want a fourth term to do more damage. Enough is enough. We need to uphold principles of conservation and preserve sustainable access so we can protect our shared resource for future generations.” The Auditor General has confirmed that under the Liberals’ watch, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) cannot collect reliable catch data—crippling its ability to protect fish stocks and manage our fisheries sustainably. Meanwhile, DFO bureaucrats ignore the real-world experience of Canadian harvesters, creating a growing disconnect between science and what’s happening on the water. According to a 2024 Nanos poll, 98% of Maritime Fishermen’s Union members cite unregulated fishing as the number one threat to their ability to earn a living. Out-of-season and undocumented harvesting continues to rise due to the Liberals’ refusal to enforce the rules. Worse still, the sixth Liberal Fisheries Minister in ten years expropriated quota from legal elver harvesters, without compensation, sending shockwaves across the fishing industry. Harvesters worry they’ll be next. The Conservatives' Canada First Fisheries Plan will: Put Science First: A Conservative Government will return to completing appropriate assessments and monitoring of Canada’s fishery stocks so better and more timely management decisions for fish harvesters can be determined to allow the industry to prepare for the upcoming fishing season. Restore Law and Order: Conservatives will restore the sustainability of the Atlantic fishery by ensuring that fishing is allowed only in accordance with DFO regulations. Protect Harvester Rights – Conservatives will uphold the principle of Willing Buyer/Willing Seller so that if new entrants access quota or fishing rights, it be purchased at fair market value from existing license holders who are willing to sell. Fishing access obtained through this policy must be managed by DFO with clear conservation objectives based on science. “Canada’s fish harvesters follow the rules, and they deserve a government that respects their rights—not one that steals their livelihoods. All harvesting must be in accordance with the rules and only people with permission, licences, and quota can do the fishing,” said D’Entremont. “This election is a choice. We can’t afford a fourth term of more Liberal chaos. We need a new Conservative government that brings back common sense and puts Canadians First–For a Change.” Conservatives have a plan to bring back control over our natural resources, restore fairness and order, and protect the fishery for future generations. O Sleep Country Canada Sponsored ·

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Conservatives Announce Plan to Protect Canada’s Fisheries After the Lost Liberal Decade, Conservativ...

Apr 16, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Mostly False

Fact Check: Conservatives Announce Plan to Protect Canada’s Fisheries After the Lost Liberal Decade, Conservatives will stop the chaos and put Canadian fishers first - for a change. April 16, 2025 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE West Dover, NS — Today, Rick Perkins, Conservative Candidate for South Shore—St. Margarets, and Chris D’Entremont, Conservative Candidate for Acadie-Annapolis, announced the Conservative plan to protect Canadian fisheries. A new Conservative government will put science first, restore law and order and protect harvester rights. Conservatives will restore sustainable fisheries and ensure fairness in Canada’s coastal communities. “During the Lost Liberal Decade, the government has failed Canada’s fish harvesters. They’ve ignored science, weakened enforcement, and stolen quota from law-abiding Canadians,” said Perkins. “Now they want a fourth term to do more damage. Enough is enough. We need to uphold principles of conservation and preserve sustainable access so we can protect our shared resource for future generations.” The Auditor General has confirmed that under the Liberals’ watch, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) cannot collect reliable catch data—crippling its ability to protect fish stocks and manage our fisheries sustainably. Meanwhile, DFO bureaucrats ignore the real-world experience of Canadian harvesters, creating a growing disconnect between science and what’s happening on the water. According to a 2024 Nanos poll, 98% of Maritime Fishermen’s Union members cite unregulated fishing as the number one threat to their ability to earn a living. Out-of-season and undocumented harvesting continues to rise due to the Liberals’ refusal to enforce the rules. Worse still, the sixth Liberal Fisheries Minister in ten years expropriated quota from legal elver harvesters, without compensation, sending shockwaves across the fishing industry. Harvesters worry they’ll be next. The Conservatives' Canada First Fisheries Plan will: Put Science First: A Conservative Government will return to completing appropriate assessments and monitoring of Canada’s fishery stocks so better and more timely management decisions for fish harvesters can be determined to allow the industry to prepare for the upcoming fishing season. Restore Law and Order: Conservatives will restore the sustainability of the Atlantic fishery by ensuring that fishing is allowed only in accordance with DFO regulations. Protect Harvester Rights – Conservatives will uphold the principle of Willing Buyer/Willing Seller so that if new entrants access quota or fishing rights, it be purchased at fair market value from existing license holders who are willing to sell. Fishing access obtained through this policy must be managed by DFO with clear conservation objectives based on science. “Canada’s fish harvesters follow the rules, and they deserve a government that respects their rights—not one that steals their livelihoods. All harvesting must be in accordance with the rules and only people with permission, licences, and quota can do the fishing,” said D’Entremont. “This election is a choice. We can’t afford a fourth term of more Liberal chaos. We need a new Conservative government that brings back common sense and puts Canadians First–For a Change.” Conservatives have a plan to bring back control over our natural resources, restore fairness and order, and protect the fishery for future generations. O Sleep Country Canada Sponsored ·

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Conservatives Announce Plan to Protect Canada’s Fisheries After the Lost Liberal Decade, Conservativ...

Apr 16, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: What’s the side between gaza and Israel war and Russia and Ukraine war? | TruthOrFake Blog