TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Was there ever any kkk influence in the democratic party

Fact Check: Was there ever any kkk influence in the democratic party

Published April 22, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Claim Analysis: "Was there ever any KKK influence in the Democratic Party?" ## 1. Introduction The claim under scrutiny is whether there has ever b...

Claim Analysis: "Was there ever any KKK influence in the Democratic Party?"

1. Introduction

The claim under scrutiny is whether there has ever been any influence of the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) within the Democratic Party. This assertion often arises in discussions about the historical relationship between the KKK and political parties in the United States, particularly in the context of race relations and political alignment in the 19th and 20th centuries.

2. What We Know

The KKK was founded in the aftermath of the Civil War, specifically in 1865, as a social club for Confederate veterans. It quickly evolved into a violent organization aimed at intimidating African Americans and suppressing their political rights, particularly in the South. The Klan's activities were primarily aimed at maintaining white supremacy and resisting Reconstruction efforts, which sought to integrate freed slaves into society and politics 37.

Historically, the KKK has had affiliations with various political figures and parties. In the early 20th century, particularly during the 1920s, the Klan gained significant political power, especially in the Midwest and South, where it influenced elections and local governance 14. Some Democratic politicians were known to have ties to the Klan during this period, and the organization endorsed certain candidates 510. However, it is crucial to note that the KKK was not founded by the Democratic Party, nor was it established as its military arm, as clarified by multiple historical sources 368.

3. Analysis

Source Evaluation

  1. Citizen Klan: Electoral Politics and the KKK in WA: This source discusses specific instances of KKK involvement in local politics, particularly in Washington State. While it provides valuable historical context, it may have a regional focus that limits its broader applicability 1.

  2. AP News Fact Check: This source categorically states that the KKK was not formed by the Democratic Party. AP News is generally considered a reliable source for fact-checking due to its adherence to journalistic standards and its use of expert opinions 3.

  3. Wikipedia: The entry on KKK members in U.S. politics provides a comprehensive overview of the Klan's influence across various political landscapes. However, Wikipedia's open-edit nature means that while it can be a good starting point, its reliability can vary based on the citations used 4.

  4. JSTOR Daily: This article offers a historical analysis of the KKK's influence on American politics, linking it to broader social dynamics. JSTOR is a reputable academic platform, but the article's age (from 2017) may mean it lacks the most current scholarship 5.

  5. USA Today Fact Check: This source reinforces the claim that the Democratic Party did not found the KKK and provides historical context to support this assertion. USA Today is a widely read news outlet, and its fact-checking division is generally reliable 6.

  6. PBS American Experience: This source provides a historical overview of the KKK's rise and its violent tactics during Reconstruction, offering a nuanced view of its political influence. PBS is known for its educational content, which adds to its credibility 7.

  7. Politifact: This source directly addresses claims regarding the KKK's founding and its relationship with the Democratic Party, providing expert analysis. Politifact is recognized for its rigorous fact-checking methodology 8.

  8. Social Justice Survival Guide: This source discusses the Democratic Party's historical ties to slavery and Jim Crow laws, but it may have a particular ideological slant that could influence its presentation of facts 9.

  9. Cambridge Guide to African American History: This source provides a scholarly perspective on the KKK's activities and its alignment with the Democratic Party during the Reconstruction era. Academic sources like this are generally reliable, but the specific context of the publication should be considered 10.

Conflicts of Interest and Methodology

Some sources may have inherent biases based on their political affiliations or the contexts in which they were written. For instance, sources that focus on the Democratic Party's historical ties to the KKK may aim to highlight contemporary political narratives. Conversely, sources that downplay these connections might be attempting to absolve current political parties of historical associations.

Additionally, the methodology behind claims of KKK influence often relies on historical interpretations that can vary widely. Evaluating the credibility of historical accounts requires careful consideration of the authors' backgrounds, the sources they cite, and the context in which they were writing.

4. Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim that there has been influence of the KKK within the Democratic Party is partially true. Historical evidence indicates that some Democratic politicians had ties to the KKK, particularly during the early 20th century when the Klan was politically active. However, it is essential to clarify that the KKK was not founded by the Democratic Party, nor was it established as its military arm. This distinction is critical in understanding the complex historical relationship between the KKK and the Democratic Party.

While there are documented instances of KKK influence on certain Democratic politicians, the broader context of political affiliations and the evolution of party ideologies complicate the narrative. The Democratic Party has undergone significant ideological shifts since the Klan's peak influence, particularly in the mid-20th century.

It is important to acknowledge the limitations of the available evidence. Historical interpretations can vary, and the sources consulted may reflect particular biases or regional focuses. As such, readers should approach this topic with a critical mindset and consider the nuances involved in historical political affiliations.

Readers are encouraged to evaluate information critically and seek out diverse sources to form a well-rounded understanding of the historical context surrounding the KKK and its political influence.

5. Sources

  1. Citizen Klan: Electoral Politics and the KKK in WA. Retrieved from https://depts.washington.edu/civilr/kkk_politicians.htm
  2. Ku Klux Klan. Retrieved from https://works.swarthmore.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1406&context=fac-poli-sci
  3. Ku Klux Klan not founded by the Democratic Party | AP News. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/article/archive-fact-checking-2336745806
  4. Ku Klux Klan members in United States politics. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan_members_in_United_States_politics
  5. The History of the KKK in American Politics - JSTOR Daily. Retrieved from https://daily.jstor.org/history-kkk-american-politics/
  6. Fact check: Democratic Party did not found the KKK, start Civil War. Retrieved from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/06/30/fact-check-democratic-party-did-not-found-kkk-start-civil-war/3253803001/
  7. Grant, Reconstruction and the KKK | American Experience. Retrieved from https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/grant-kkk/
  8. "The KKK was founded as the military arm of the Democratic Party." Retrieved from https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2017/oct/23/dane-county-republican-party/debunking-claim-kkk-was-founded-military-arm-democ/
  9. The Democratic Party's History of Slavery, Jim Crow, and the KKK. Retrieved from https://www.socialjusticesurvivalguide.com/2018/01/08/the-democratic-partys-history-slavery-jim-crow-kkk/
  10. Ku Klux Klan (KKK) - The Cambridge Guide to African American History. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-guide-to-african-american-history/ku-klux-klan-kkk/AF98C32F011BFB6DBD98879DE0F08C73

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Not trying to freak anybody out. I wasn't going to talk about this for a while but is anyone else like looking into the fact that there's 76 volcanoes that are currently erupting. Our polls have moved astronomic. Like they're they're moving faster than they ever have in history. And on top of that we've got the earthquakes everywhere and the fires. We've got earthquakes that are happening at Yellowstone National Park and Santorini which are two of the most massive volcanoes. Like we have the the gases that are 00:31 coming from these different volcanic eruptions that are spreading all over the planet and then on top of that we've also got the solar flares that are hitting the magnetic field of our planet which if it weakens enough can actually cause the the poles to flip. And that's concerning because if you've looked into what happens if that I mean we don't know for sure. It's theoretical. For entertainment purposes only always and forever. Of course. But at Theoretically it wouldn't be good. Who knows? There could be 01:07 like some saving grace. Maybe it won't happen. Maybe it'll just all calm down. But it goes along also with the hopey prophecy. Of the the two brothers or twins flipping and then the weakening and then the the floods and all that that jazz that seems to be And then we've got the airplanes on top of that which could either be maybe from the magnetic field or the solar flares or from the poles shifting. I have no idea. But there's a lot of pl
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Not trying to freak anybody out. I wasn't going to talk about this for a while but is anyone else like looking into the fact that there's 76 volcanoes that are currently erupting. Our polls have moved astronomic. Like they're they're moving faster than they ever have in history. And on top of that we've got the earthquakes everywhere and the fires. We've got earthquakes that are happening at Yellowstone National Park and Santorini which are two of the most massive volcanoes. Like we have the the gases that are 00:31 coming from these different volcanic eruptions that are spreading all over the planet and then on top of that we've also got the solar flares that are hitting the magnetic field of our planet which if it weakens enough can actually cause the the poles to flip. And that's concerning because if you've looked into what happens if that I mean we don't know for sure. It's theoretical. For entertainment purposes only always and forever. Of course. But at Theoretically it wouldn't be good. Who knows? There could be 01:07 like some saving grace. Maybe it won't happen. Maybe it'll just all calm down. But it goes along also with the hopey prophecy. Of the the two brothers or twins flipping and then the weakening and then the the floods and all that that jazz that seems to be And then we've got the airplanes on top of that which could either be maybe from the magnetic field or the solar flares or from the poles shifting. I have no idea. But there's a lot of pl

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 Not trying to freak anybody out. I wasn't going to talk about this for a while but is anyone else like looking into the fact that there's 76 volcanoes that are currently erupting. Our polls have moved astronomic. Like they're they're moving faster than they ever have in history. And on top of that we've got the earthquakes everywhere and the fires. We've got earthquakes that are happening at Yellowstone National Park and Santorini which are two of the most massive volcanoes. Like we have the the gases that are 00:31 coming from these different volcanic eruptions that are spreading all over the planet and then on top of that we've also got the solar flares that are hitting the magnetic field of our planet which if it weakens enough can actually cause the the poles to flip. And that's concerning because if you've looked into what happens if that I mean we don't know for sure. It's theoretical. For entertainment purposes only always and forever. Of course. But at Theoretically it wouldn't be good. Who knows? There could be 01:07 like some saving grace. Maybe it won't happen. Maybe it'll just all calm down. But it goes along also with the hopey prophecy. Of the the two brothers or twins flipping and then the weakening and then the the floods and all that that jazz that seems to be And then we've got the airplanes on top of that which could either be maybe from the magnetic field or the solar flares or from the poles shifting. I have no idea. But there's a lot of pl

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
🔍
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Some insane breaking news coming out of the White House as we are now learning that President Joe Biden 73 days between his transition of him leaving office and President Donald Trump becoming president there was a discrepancy in which they actually gave out over $73 billion dollars in loans to small and medium businesses. However, they can't find the list of who they gave the money to. They are now doing congressional hearings on what happened to the money whether or not the money was actually ever given to any 00:32 small or medium businesses. Of course, Joe Biden had no comment as he doesn't recall any of those situations going at the time and now is admitted that his staff was using an auto pen in order for them to sign whatever they need from him in order to move forward and that these loans were likely a part of that auto pen

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Some insane breaking news coming out of the White House as we are now learning that President Joe Biden 73 days between his transition of him leaving office and President Donald Trump becoming president there was a discrepancy in which they actually gave out over $73 billion dollars in loans to small and medium businesses. However, they can't find the list of who they gave the money to. They are now doing congressional hearings on what happened to the money whether or not the money was actually ever given to any 00:32 small or medium businesses. Of course, Joe Biden had no comment as he doesn't recall any of those situations going at the time and now is admitted that his staff was using an auto pen in order for them to sign whatever they need from him in order to move forward and that these loans were likely a part of that auto pen

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: There are About 1.4 million American women on OnlyFans. There are about 10 million women between the age of 18-25 in the US. It can be reasonably inferred that 14% of women 18-25 have only fans accounts.
Partially True

Fact Check: There are About 1.4 million American women on OnlyFans. There are about 10 million women between the age of 18-25 in the US. It can be reasonably inferred that 14% of women 18-25 have only fans accounts.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: There are About 1.4 million American women on OnlyFans. There are about 10 million women between the age of 18-25 in the US. It can be reasonably inferred that 14% of women 18-25 have only fans accounts.

Aug 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump legally deployed the D.C. National Guard on January 6, 2021, in response to the Capitol riot, with proper authority under the Home Rule Act, that there was a delay in deployment due to Pentagon issues, and that his intent was genuinely to secure the Capitol.
Partially True

Fact Check: Trump legally deployed the D.C. National Guard on January 6, 2021, in response to the Capitol riot, with proper authority under the Home Rule Act, that there was a delay in deployment due to Pentagon issues, and that his intent was genuinely to secure the Capitol.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump legally deployed the D.C. National Guard on January 6, 2021, in response to the Capitol riot, with proper authority under the Home Rule Act, that there was a delay in deployment due to Pentagon issues, and that his intent was genuinely to secure the Capitol.

Aug 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In 1860, there were fewer than 10 Republicans in the United States who owned slaves, and the vast majority of the approximately four million slaves were owned by Democrats.
Partially True

Fact Check: In 1860, there were fewer than 10 Republicans in the United States who owned slaves, and the vast majority of the approximately four million slaves were owned by Democrats.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In 1860, there were fewer than 10 Republicans in the United States who owned slaves, and the vast majority of the approximately four million slaves were owned by Democrats.

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks