Fact Check: Voters rejected an abortion ban, yet Republicans push for a stricter one.

Fact Check: Voters rejected an abortion ban, yet Republicans push for a stricter one.

Published June 17, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: Voters Rejected an Abortion Ban, Yet Republicans Push for a Stricter One ## What We Know In recent elections, voters in several states ...

Fact Check: Voters Rejected an Abortion Ban, Yet Republicans Push for a Stricter One

What We Know

In recent elections, voters in several states have decisively rejected measures aimed at restricting abortion access. For instance, in 2024, voters in states like Arizona, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, Colorado, and New York approved ballot initiatives that protect abortion rights (source-2). Conversely, in Nebraska, voters opted for a measure that limits abortion access, prohibiting it after 12 weeks of pregnancy (source-2).

Despite these outcomes, Republican lawmakers continue to advocate for stricter abortion bans. For example, Senator Lindsey Graham proposed a national abortion ban after 15 weeks, a move that has not gained traction (source-1). Additionally, gubernatorial candidate Glenn Youngkin of Virginia focused on a similar 15-week ban during his campaign, but ultimately lost control of the Virginia legislature (source-1).

Polling data indicates that abortion remains a critical issue for voters, particularly suburban women in swing states, suggesting that the push for stricter bans may not align with voter sentiment (source-1).

Analysis

The evidence suggests a clear disconnect between voter preferences and Republican legislative actions regarding abortion. The approval of pro-choice measures in multiple states indicates a significant public support for abortion rights. This trend has been observed even in traditionally conservative areas, where voters have rejected anti-abortion amendments (source-2).

On the other hand, the Republican Party's continued push for stricter abortion bans, such as the proposed 15-week limit, appears to be a strategic maneuver to appeal to their base while navigating the backlash from broader public opinion (source-1). This is compounded by the fact that many Republican lawmakers are now facing the realities of how restrictive laws can adversely affect women's health outcomes, as illustrated by various case studies of women experiencing complications under current laws (source-1).

The sources used in this analysis are credible, with the first source being a well-respected think tank (Brookings Institution) and the second source being a dedicated report on state court issues. Both provide in-depth insights into the political landscape surrounding abortion rights.

Conclusion

The claim that "voters rejected an abortion ban, yet Republicans push for a stricter one" is True. Evidence from recent elections shows that voters have consistently favored measures that protect abortion rights, while Republican lawmakers continue to propose stricter bans that do not reflect the electorate's preferences. This ongoing tension highlights a significant divide between party strategies and public sentiment regarding abortion.

Sources

  1. Abortion and the 2024 election: There is no easy way out ...
  2. Voters in Seven States Pass Measures to Protect Abortion
  3. Republicans Prove There Was a Big Catch About 'Leaving ...
  4. Map shows how abortion measures fared on the ballot in ...
  5. Changes Ahead: Abortion Policy Proposals Affecting ...
  6. History of abortion ballot measures
  7. State Policy Trends 2023: In the First Full Year Since Roe ...
  8. Abortion rights win elections, even in deep-red states

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
This whole saga with Epstein
having any impact on Trump's
approval rating overall when it
comes to the Grand Old Party?
Yeah I mean look I think this
one surprised me a bit because
of all these complaints online
going after Trump and the
Epstein Fasio might think his
approval ratings were going
down with Republicans if
anything they're going up
Republicans who approve of
Trump look at our CNN poll the
prior 186 percent the one out
this week 88% were Republicans
how about Quinipiac the prior
poll 87% approval of
Republicans week out, 90% with
Republicans. If anything,
00:33
Donald Trump's approval rating
has gone up since this whole
Epstein saga started. He is at
the apex or close there too in
terms of his popularity with
Republican voters. Epstein
files complaints or not. You
just prove that not everything
online is real. Yes. In real
world. Who knew? Who knew?
Amazing. Twitter and X are not
reality.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 This whole saga with Epstein having any impact on Trump's approval rating overall when it comes to the Grand Old Party? Yeah I mean look I think this one surprised me a bit because of all these complaints online going after Trump and the Epstein Fasio might think his approval ratings were going down with Republicans if anything they're going up Republicans who approve of Trump look at our CNN poll the prior 186 percent the one out this week 88% were Republicans how about Quinipiac the prior poll 87% approval of Republicans week out, 90% with Republicans. If anything, 00:33 Donald Trump's approval rating has gone up since this whole Epstein saga started. He is at the apex or close there too in terms of his popularity with Republican voters. Epstein files complaints or not. You just prove that not everything online is real. Yes. In real world. Who knew? Who knew? Amazing. Twitter and X are not reality.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 This whole saga with Epstein having any impact on Trump's approval rating overall when it comes to the Grand Old Party? Yeah I mean look I think this one surprised me a bit because of all these complaints online going after Trump and the Epstein Fasio might think his approval ratings were going down with Republicans if anything they're going up Republicans who approve of Trump look at our CNN poll the prior 186 percent the one out this week 88% were Republicans how about Quinipiac the prior poll 87% approval of Republicans week out, 90% with Republicans. If anything, 00:33 Donald Trump's approval rating has gone up since this whole Epstein saga started. He is at the apex or close there too in terms of his popularity with Republican voters. Epstein files complaints or not. You just prove that not everything online is real. Yes. In real world. Who knew? Who knew? Amazing. Twitter and X are not reality.

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The AfD is currently supported by more than one in five voters.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The AfD is currently supported by more than one in five voters.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The AfD is currently supported by more than one in five voters.

Jul 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 62% of Wisconsin voters said abortion should be legal in all or most cases.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: 62% of Wisconsin voters said abortion should be legal in all or most cases.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 62% of Wisconsin voters said abortion should be legal in all or most cases.

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The RECKONING has begun.
🔥UNTIL IT HITS HOME, TRUMP VOTERS WILL KEEP LOOKING AWAY—BUT THE RECKONING IS HERE. 🔥
Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” isn’t a budget—it’s Project 2025 turned into law. A blueprint for authoritarian rule disguised as fiscal policy.
And the damage? It’s about to hit YOU.
 Here’s how it’s coming for YOU:
🌪️ WHEN THE STORM HITS & NO ONE COMES
Sec. 80307–80309: Slashes climate resilience + FEMA funds
➡️ Hurricanes, floods, and wildfires will leave your town in ruins—and there
Partially True

Fact Check: The RECKONING has begun. 🔥UNTIL IT HITS HOME, TRUMP VOTERS WILL KEEP LOOKING AWAY—BUT THE RECKONING IS HERE. 🔥 Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” isn’t a budget—it’s Project 2025 turned into law. A blueprint for authoritarian rule disguised as fiscal policy. And the damage? It’s about to hit YOU. Here’s how it’s coming for YOU: 🌪️ WHEN THE STORM HITS & NO ONE COMES Sec. 80307–80309: Slashes climate resilience + FEMA funds ➡️ Hurricanes, floods, and wildfires will leave your town in ruins—and there

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The RECKONING has begun. 🔥UNTIL IT HITS HOME, TRUMP VOTERS WILL KEEP LOOKING AWAY—BUT THE RECKONING IS HERE. 🔥 Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” isn’t a budget—it’s Project 2025 turned into law. A blueprint for authoritarian rule disguised as fiscal policy. And the damage? It’s about to hit YOU. Here’s how it’s coming for YOU: 🌪️ WHEN THE STORM HITS & NO ONE COMES Sec. 80307–80309: Slashes climate resilience + FEMA funds ➡️ Hurricanes, floods, and wildfires will leave your town in ruins—and there

Jul 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The RECKONING has begun.
🔥UNTIL IT HITS HOME, TRUMP VOTERS WILL KEEP LOOKING AWAY—BUT THE RECKONING IS HERE. 🔥
Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” isn’t a budget—it’s Project 2025 turned into law. A blueprint for authoritarian rule disguised as fiscal policy.
And the damage? It’s about to hit YOU.
 Here’s how it’s coming for YOU:
🌪️ WHEN THE STORM HITS & NO ONE COMES
Sec. 80307–80309: Slashes climate resilience + FEMA funds
➡️ Hurricanes, floods, and wildfires will leave your town in ruins—and there
Partially True

Fact Check: The RECKONING has begun. 🔥UNTIL IT HITS HOME, TRUMP VOTERS WILL KEEP LOOKING AWAY—BUT THE RECKONING IS HERE. 🔥 Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” isn’t a budget—it’s Project 2025 turned into law. A blueprint for authoritarian rule disguised as fiscal policy. And the damage? It’s about to hit YOU. Here’s how it’s coming for YOU: 🌪️ WHEN THE STORM HITS & NO ONE COMES Sec. 80307–80309: Slashes climate resilience + FEMA funds ➡️ Hurricanes, floods, and wildfires will leave your town in ruins—and there

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The RECKONING has begun. 🔥UNTIL IT HITS HOME, TRUMP VOTERS WILL KEEP LOOKING AWAY—BUT THE RECKONING IS HERE. 🔥 Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” isn’t a budget—it’s Project 2025 turned into law. A blueprint for authoritarian rule disguised as fiscal policy. And the damage? It’s about to hit YOU. Here’s how it’s coming for YOU: 🌪️ WHEN THE STORM HITS & NO ONE COMES Sec. 80307–80309: Slashes climate resilience + FEMA funds ➡️ Hurricanes, floods, and wildfires will leave your town in ruins—and there

Jul 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Voters rejected an abortion ban, yet Republicans push for a stricter one. | TruthOrFake Blog