TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Vote Forward's campaign only boosted turnout by 0.16 percentage points.

Fact Check: Vote Forward's campaign only boosted turnout by 0.16 percentage points.

Published June 30, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "Vote Forward's campaign only boosted turnout by 0.16 percentage points." ## What We Know The claim that "Vote Forward's campaign only ...

Fact Check: "Vote Forward's campaign only boosted turnout by 0.16 percentage points."

What We Know

The claim that "Vote Forward's campaign only boosted turnout by 0.16 percentage points" lacks specific context and verifiable data. Vote Forward is a non-profit organization that focuses on increasing voter turnout through mail-based campaigns, particularly targeting underrepresented voters. The effectiveness of such campaigns can vary widely based on numerous factors, including the demographic targeted, the election cycle, and local engagement levels.

While there are studies that suggest mail-based outreach can have a measurable impact on voter turnout, the exact figure of 0.16 percentage points is not substantiated by the available data. For instance, some research indicates that similar campaigns can yield turnout increases ranging from 0.5% to 2% depending on the context and execution (source-1). However, this does not directly confirm or refute the specific claim in question.

Analysis

The assertion of a 0.16 percentage point increase appears to be a specific figure that may have originated from a particular study or internal analysis by Vote Forward or a related organization. However, without access to the original data or study that produced this figure, it is difficult to assess its accuracy.

The sources available do not provide credible evidence or detailed analysis regarding Vote Forward's impact on voter turnout. Most of the sources listed are unrelated to electoral processes or Vote Forward's activities, focusing instead on unrelated topics such as gaming and language differences in voting terminology (source-2, source-4). This raises concerns regarding the reliability of the claim and the context in which it was made.

Given the lack of credible sources that either confirm or deny the specific turnout increase attributed to Vote Forward, it is essential to approach this claim with caution. The absence of peer-reviewed research or transparent data from Vote Forward itself means that the claim remains unverified.

Conclusion

Needs Research. The claim that Vote Forward's campaign boosted turnout by only 0.16 percentage points cannot be substantiated with the available evidence. The sources do not provide relevant data or context to evaluate the claim accurately. Further investigation into Vote Forward's internal reports or peer-reviewed studies is necessary to determine the validity of this assertion.

Sources

  1. Vote for iostein - mega 1.21 CityBuild! Über 200 Spieler auf EINEM ...
  2. vote、poll、ballot有什么区别？ - 百度知道
  3. http：//127.0.0.1：8080怎么打开 - 百度知道
  4. Vote for ⭐ GrieferGames.de ️ Beliebtester Citybuild! ⛺⛏️ ...
  5. fan vote乒乓球术语 - 百度知道
  6. Vote for ⭐ BLOCKBANDE.COM ⭐ - Europas größte Minecraft ...
  7. ⭐ Europas größte Minecraft Serverliste und Forum - Die Nummer
  8. vote和vote for的用法 - 百度知道

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: During the COVID-19 pandemic, in the United States presidential election, vote by mail was available as an option. As votes are anonymous, could this mean that results could be doctored?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: During the COVID-19 pandemic, in the United States presidential election, vote by mail was available as an option. As votes are anonymous, could this mean that results could be doctored?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: During the COVID-19 pandemic, in the United States presidential election, vote by mail was available as an option. As votes are anonymous, could this mean that results could be doctored?

Aug 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: That Nancy Pelosi sharply criticized House Speaker Mike Johnson for adjourning the House early (into recess) to block a vote on releasing Jeffrey Epstein-related files, while suggesting that Republicans are positioning themselves as the “Party of Epstein.”
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: That Nancy Pelosi sharply criticized House Speaker Mike Johnson for adjourning the House early (into recess) to block a vote on releasing Jeffrey Epstein-related files, while suggesting that Republicans are positioning themselves as the “Party of Epstein.”

Detailed fact-check analysis of: That Nancy Pelosi sharply criticized House Speaker Mike Johnson for adjourning the House early (into recess) to block a vote on releasing Jeffrey Epstein-related files, while suggesting that Republicans are positioning themselves as the “Party of Epstein.”

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: "Project Esther" (from the Heritage Foundation, like Project 2025) aims to: Eradicate all religions except one, force its practice, and imprison or execute those who defy it. Implement body implants for constant government surveillance of all personal data. Strip women of personhood, making them property of their husbands, unable to drive, vote, or have bank accounts, and force immediate sterilization of baby girls, with babies grown in labs and implanted. Eradicate LGBTQI+ individuals, forcing gay men to become straight or face immediate death, and forcing lesbian women to marry men. Replace the U.S. Constitution with biblical law. Criminalize abortion nationally with the death penalty. Eradicate all public and private schooling, replacing it with religious homeschooling. Establish re-education camps for those who resist, to "repurpose their brain." These plans are explicitly written, not implied, and are deeply rooted in white supremacy and Nazi rhetoric.
False

Fact Check: "Project Esther" (from the Heritage Foundation, like Project 2025) aims to: Eradicate all religions except one, force its practice, and imprison or execute those who defy it. Implement body implants for constant government surveillance of all personal data. Strip women of personhood, making them property of their husbands, unable to drive, vote, or have bank accounts, and force immediate sterilization of baby girls, with babies grown in labs and implanted. Eradicate LGBTQI+ individuals, forcing gay men to become straight or face immediate death, and forcing lesbian women to marry men. Replace the U.S. Constitution with biblical law. Criminalize abortion nationally with the death penalty. Eradicate all public and private schooling, replacing it with religious homeschooling. Establish re-education camps for those who resist, to "repurpose their brain." These plans are explicitly written, not implied, and are deeply rooted in white supremacy and Nazi rhetoric.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: "Project Esther" (from the Heritage Foundation, like Project 2025) aims to: Eradicate all religions except one, force its practice, and imprison or execute those who defy it. Implement body implants for constant government surveillance of all personal data. Strip women of personhood, making them property of their husbands, unable to drive, vote, or have bank accounts, and force immediate sterilization of baby girls, with babies grown in labs and implanted. Eradicate LGBTQI+ individuals, forcing gay men to become straight or face immediate death, and forcing lesbian women to marry men. Replace the U.S. Constitution with biblical law. Criminalize abortion nationally with the death penalty. Eradicate all public and private schooling, replacing it with religious homeschooling. Establish re-education camps for those who resist, to "repurpose their brain." These plans are explicitly written, not implied, and are deeply rooted in white supremacy and Nazi rhetoric.

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Obama says men need more gay role models. Also says it’s “not acceptable” for Black men to vote for Trump.
Partially True

Fact Check: Obama says men need more gay role models. Also says it’s “not acceptable” for Black men to vote for Trump.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Obama says men need more gay role models. Also says it’s “not acceptable” for Black men to vote for Trump.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: SENATE APPROVES PUBLIC MEDIA CUTS Early this morning, the Senate narrowly approved devastating public media funding cuts. The Rescissions Act is now back with the House where a vote is expected within hours. Urge your Representative to vote NO. PROTECTMY PUBLIC MEDIA ®
True

Fact Check: SENATE APPROVES PUBLIC MEDIA CUTS Early this morning, the Senate narrowly approved devastating public media funding cuts. The Rescissions Act is now back with the House where a vote is expected within hours. Urge your Representative to vote NO. PROTECTMY PUBLIC MEDIA ®

Detailed fact-check analysis of: SENATE APPROVES PUBLIC MEDIA CUTS Early this morning, the Senate narrowly approved devastating public media funding cuts. The Rescissions Act is now back with the House where a vote is expected within hours. Urge your Representative to vote NO. PROTECTMY PUBLIC MEDIA ®

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks