Fact Check: Videos show masked agents detaining primarily Latino men in L.A.

Fact Check: Videos show masked agents detaining primarily Latino men in L.A.

Published June 23, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "Videos show masked agents detaining primarily Latino men in L.A." ## What We Know Recent reports indicate that there have been multipl...

Fact Check: "Videos show masked agents detaining primarily Latino men in L.A."

What We Know

Recent reports indicate that there have been multiple incidents involving masked federal agents detaining individuals in Los Angeles, particularly in areas with significant Latino populations. For instance, a video captured by Melyssa Rivas shows masked agents detaining a man outside Our Lady of Perpetual Help Catholic Church in Downey, California, which is a predominantly Latino city (AP News). Additionally, Brian Gavidia, a Latino U.S. citizen, was detained and questioned by Border Patrol agents in Montebello, California, where he expressed that he was American, highlighting concerns about racial profiling (Los Angeles Times).

Reports indicate that these operations are part of a broader strategy by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to increase immigration arrests in response to local sanctuary policies (AP News). The detained individuals often include Latino men, as noted in various eyewitness accounts and videos circulating on social media.

Analysis

The claim that videos show masked agents detaining primarily Latino men in Los Angeles is supported by multiple sources, including eyewitness accounts and video evidence. The credibility of these sources is generally high, as they include reputable news organizations such as the Associated Press and the Los Angeles Times, which have documented these incidents with direct quotes from witnesses and video footage (AP News, Los Angeles Times).

However, while the evidence supports the claim of masked agents detaining individuals, it is essential to note that not all detained individuals are Latino, and the reports primarily focus on those who are. The narrative surrounding these events also raises concerns about racial profiling, as highlighted by Gavidia's experience, where he was questioned based on his appearance despite being a U.S. citizen (Los Angeles Times). This aspect complicates the claim, as it suggests a broader issue of racial dynamics rather than a straightforward depiction of the events.

Conclusion

The claim that "videos show masked agents detaining primarily Latino men in L.A." is Partially True. While there is substantial evidence of masked agents detaining individuals in Latino neighborhoods, the focus on Latino men specifically may not fully encompass the diversity of those affected. The incidents raise critical questions about racial profiling and the implications of immigration enforcement practices, which merit further examination.

Sources

  1. 'I'm an American, Bro!': Latinos Report Raids in Which U.S. Citizenship ...
  2. More Americans are witnessing their first immigration raids | AP News
  3. Video captures masked immigration agents detaining ... - NBC Los Angeles
  4. Video shows immigration agents interrogating a ... - Los Angeles Times

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Videos show ICE agents detaining primarily Latino men in Los Angeles.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Videos show ICE agents detaining primarily Latino men in Los Angeles.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Videos show ICE agents detaining primarily Latino men in Los Angeles.

Jun 23, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: L.A. County Sheriff Robert Luna stated that deputies only use less-lethal weapons when they or others are being attacked, and that videos may not show the full context of the situation.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: L.A. County Sheriff Robert Luna stated that deputies only use less-lethal weapons when they or others are being attacked, and that videos may not show the full context of the situation.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: L.A. County Sheriff Robert Luna stated that deputies only use less-lethal weapons when they or others are being attacked, and that videos may not show the full context of the situation.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
911 was a false flag. For the
first 10 years, I did not think
anything other than the
official narrative then after
being shown a video, a close up
video of building number seven
coming down and that got me
going because it's obvious to
me that building seven was was
a controlled demolition because
the building collapses from the
bottom down. The trade centers
were unique in that they were
designed to withstand the
00:33
impact of a a a jet. From what
I understand the the outer
skeleton of the building. The
outer columns was like a a fish
net and you had these inner
core columns which was
substantial thick steel beams
to withstand four or five times
what the loads were. Got it.
The engineers always over
design a building. No steel
frame building has ever
collapsed before or since 9/
eleven. So that should say
something right there. And it
said that building seven it was
01:05
aggressive collapse that it was
caused by fire but progressive
collapse unlike the twin
towers, the twin towers
collapse from the top down.
That's a progressive collapse.
Sure. Floor by floor by floor.
But if you look at the videos
of building seven collapsing,
it collapses uniformly, it's
collapsing from the bottom, the
building stays intact all the
way to the bottom of the ground
and you could see the sides
caving in on it. For a building
to collapse uniformly which the
video show all the load bearing
it would have to have failed
01:36
simultaneously. Now, fire
doesn't act like that. I came
across an analogy of the twin
towers and if you could
visualize cast iron stoves
stacked. One on top of each
other. The stoves up at the
top. Yes, there's fire and
they've been damaged but the
stoves on the bottom, they
haven't been damaged. Okay. So,
the structure underneath all of
that is intact. So, it's
impossible for a building to
collapse near free fall speed
and increase. Without a
02:07
controlled demolition. You're
running into the path of most
resistance. I something else is
going on. I don't believe that
it was just the planes or the
fires I think that and they
examine the dust and they found
what they call thermitic
material which is like a
explosive incendiary which was
in the dust samples and that's
documented. There were reports
of the buildings were
undergoing a extensive elevator
renovation in the two or three
years prior to all kinds of
02:40
workers they had access to the
the core the cores of the
building and on the day of the
attack the the elevator company
would not assist in the
operations of the elevators and
the elevator company was the
elevator company it
subsequently went out of
business and a couple of years
after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Wagner Group's videos show soldiers butchering civilians and threatening cannibalism.
True

Fact Check: Wagner Group's videos show soldiers butchering civilians and threatening cannibalism.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Wagner Group's videos show soldiers butchering civilians and threatening cannibalism.

Jun 24, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Grok falsely labeled AI-generated videos as real footage from the conflict.
Partially True

Fact Check: Grok falsely labeled AI-generated videos as real footage from the conflict.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Grok falsely labeled AI-generated videos as real footage from the conflict.

Jun 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Mamdani's videos amassed over 5 million views, redefining political campaigning.
Partially True

Fact Check: Mamdani's videos amassed over 5 million views, redefining political campaigning.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Mamdani's videos amassed over 5 million views, redefining political campaigning.

Jun 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Videos show masked agents detaining primarily Latino men in L.A. | TruthOrFake Blog