Fact Check: Uthmeier boasted about defying a federal court order in media interviews.

Fact Check: Uthmeier boasted about defying a federal court order in media interviews.

Published June 18, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Uthmeier boasted about defying a federal court order in media interviews." ## What We Know Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier was...

Fact Check: "Uthmeier boasted about defying a federal court order in media interviews."

What We Know

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier was recently found in civil contempt by U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams for his actions regarding a state immigration law. The judge issued a temporary restraining order that prohibited law enforcement from enforcing the law, which Uthmeier publicly disagreed with. Following the judge's order, Uthmeier sent a memo to law enforcement indicating that he believed the judge was legally incorrect and that he could not prevent police from enforcing the law. In a social media post, he stated, “If being held in contempt is what it costs to defend the rule of law and stand firmly behind President Trump’s agenda on illegal immigration, so be it” (AP News, Tallahassee.com).

During a media interview, Uthmeier claimed that Judge Williams did not have jurisdiction to prevent law enforcement officers from making arrests under the law (New York Times). This statement reflects a clear defiance of the court's order, as he was instructed to notify law enforcement that they could not enforce the law due to the injunction (Miami Herald).

Analysis

The evidence indicates that Uthmeier did indeed boast about his defiance of the federal court order. His public statements, including the social media post and comments made during interviews, suggest a deliberate choice to challenge the court's authority. Judge Williams emphasized that Uthmeier's role as Attorney General carries a unique responsibility to uphold the law, and his actions undermined that integrity (Tallahassee.com, AP News).

Uthmeier's defense, which claimed that he was entitled to express his disagreement with the court's order, does not absolve him of the contempt ruling. The judge pointed out that while he is free to criticize the court's decisions, he must still adhere to the court's orders (Miami Herald). The contempt ruling was based on Uthmeier's failure to comply with the directive to inform law enforcement of the injunction, which he did not do adequately in his communications (AP News, Tallahassee.com).

The sources used in this analysis are credible, including major news outlets like the Associated Press and the New York Times, which have a reputation for factual reporting. The legal context provided by the judge's statements adds further weight to the claim that Uthmeier not only defied the court order but also publicly boasted about it.

Conclusion

The claim that "Uthmeier boasted about defying a federal court order in media interviews" is True. Uthmeier's public statements and actions demonstrate a clear defiance of the court's authority, as he openly criticized the judge's ruling and indicated a willingness to disregard the injunction. This behavior was formally recognized by the court, which found him in contempt for his actions.

Sources

  1. Florida Attorney General Defied Order Blocking Part of Immigration Law
  2. Judge finds Florida attorney general in contempt over immigration law
  3. Contempt ruling hits AG Uthmeier over defiance of court
  4. Judge finds Florida attorney general in contempt for defying court order
  5. DeSantis stands by AG James Uthmeier's defiance of federal court order
  6. Federal judge finds FL attorney general in contempt of court
  7. DeSantis stands by AG James Uthmeier's defiance of federal court order
  8. Judge says she’s shocked Florida attorney general defied court order

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Uthmeier vows to continue defying court orders to support Trump's immigration agenda.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Uthmeier vows to continue defying court orders to support Trump's immigration agenda.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Uthmeier vows to continue defying court orders to support Trump's immigration agenda.

Jun 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Judge warns Uthmeier of fines if he fails to comply with court's order.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Judge warns Uthmeier of fines if he fails to comply with court's order.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Judge warns Uthmeier of fines if he fails to comply with court's order.

Jun 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Judge accuses Uthmeier of twisting court orders in explosive ruling.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Judge accuses Uthmeier of twisting court orders in explosive ruling.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Judge accuses Uthmeier of twisting court orders in explosive ruling.

Jun 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: South Carolina unlawfully cuts Planned Parenthood's Medicaid funding, defying federal law.
True

Fact Check: South Carolina unlawfully cuts Planned Parenthood's Medicaid funding, defying federal law.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: South Carolina unlawfully cuts Planned Parenthood's Medicaid funding, defying federal law.

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Uthmeier claims no lawful order prevents enforcement of Florida's immigration laws.
False

Fact Check: Uthmeier claims no lawful order prevents enforcement of Florida's immigration laws.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Uthmeier claims no lawful order prevents enforcement of Florida's immigration laws.

Jun 18, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: How nuts is Mark Carney? Perhaps nuttier than you think. Have a read of this piece in the Financial Post, by Matthew Lau. "Having left his gig as UN Special Envoy for Climate and Finance to lead the federal Liberal government, Mark Carney is now in a position to focus his and Greta Thunberg’s global climate crusade squarely on Canada. The crusade, Carney boasted back in 2021 while in his previous role, is worth many trillions of dollars. As he told CBC News at that year’s UN climate conference, “We have banks, asset managers, pension funds, insurance companies from around the world — more than 45 countries — and their total resources, totalling US$130 trillion” dedicated to transitioning the world’s economy away from fossil fuels. That dollar figure is higher than global GDP. Last month, Carney laid out Canada’s required contribution to his climate ambitions: “Canada must invest $2 trillion by 2050 — about $80 billion per year — to become carbon competitive and achieve Net Zero. However, investments in decarbonisation currently run between $10–20 billion annually.” The implication is that another $60-70 billion a year will need to be wrung out of Canadian businesses and consumers, either through direct taxation and government spending or with regulatory browbeating to push Canadians’ savings and investments into global warming initiatives. Carney has made no effort to hide his agenda to browbeat businesses into joining his and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade. In a 2021 interview he declared, “We need a sustainable economy, and is your business aligned with that? Are your hiring practices consistent with that? Are you developing people in a way that’s consistent with that? Ultimately, what’s being asked of businesses when it comes to climate is, do you have a plan for net-zero? Canada has a legislated objective for net zero alongside another 130 countries.” “A Swedish teenager,” Carney continued, referring to Thunberg, “can figure out the carbon budget and that we have less than 10 years and you have to get to net-zero to stabilize it and if you’re a company and you have purpose, well, what’s your plan? And all these plans need to come together.” This is utter insanity: under Justin Trudeau Canada suffered rapidly declining business investment and now his successor wants the country’s business leaders to take financial planning directives from Greta Thunberg. While the federal government barrels down the road to net-zero impoverishment for Canada, everyone else is looking for the exit ramp. In January, six of the largest U.S. banks — JPMorganChase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley — quit the Carney-led net-zero banking alliance. Canada’s Big Six Banks — RBC, TD Bank, BMO, Scotiabank, CIBC and National Bank — have quit the initiative as well. Even Europe is beginning to back off on government piling climate obligations onto businesses in the name of fighting global warming. As the Wall Street Journal reports, the EU is watering down its climate accounting policies “amid pushback from member states and companies within the bloc over the new rules, which they say would have increased costs and reduced the competitiveness of their business.” Specifically, regulations previously scheduled for this year would have forced companies “to report in detail on their environmental, social and corporate-governance performance while making significant cuts to the emissions from within their supply chain.” The EU is now dropping, weakening or postponing many of these climate regulations, so that businesses will be able to better “grow, innovate, and create quality jobs.” This is effectively an admission that piling climate obligations and environmental reporting mandates onto businesses prevents them from growing, innovating and creating good jobs. Unfortunately, Mark Carney is all about climate obligations and reporting mandates. The road Canada is currently marching down for climate-related financial disclosures is based on a framework proposed by a task force Carney initiated in 2015. His aforementioned Thunberg-praising interview was not with an environmental journalist, but with Pivot Magazine, which is published by CPA Canada, the accounting industry’s national association. “We cannot get to net-zero without proper climate reporting,” he insisted, speaking of the need for “one core global standard” for climate accounting and reporting. A global climate reporting standard to help push trillions of dollars — yes, trillions with a “T” — from Canadian workers and taxpayers into Mark Carney and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade? After a decade of Justin Trudeau’s ruinous policies weakening Canada from coast to coast, there could be little worse for the country and its economy than a Liberal government led by Mark Carney." The Financial Post Cape Breton Politics Jason Boudreau · 1h · Big numbers in unions. 😁😁

Detailed fact-check analysis of: How nuts is Mark Carney? Perhaps nuttier than you think. Have a read of this piece in the Financial Post, by Matthew Lau. "Having left his gig as UN Special Envoy for Climate and Finance to lead the federal Liberal government, Mark Carney is now in a position to focus his and Greta Thunberg’s global climate crusade squarely on Canada. The crusade, Carney boasted back in 2021 while in his previous role, is worth many trillions of dollars. As he told CBC News at that year’s UN climate conference, “We have banks, asset managers, pension funds, insurance companies from around the world — more than 45 countries — and their total resources, totalling US$130 trillion” dedicated to transitioning the world’s economy away from fossil fuels. That dollar figure is higher than global GDP. Last month, Carney laid out Canada’s required contribution to his climate ambitions: “Canada must invest $2 trillion by 2050 — about $80 billion per year — to become carbon competitive and achieve Net Zero. However, investments in decarbonisation currently run between $10–20 billion annually.” The implication is that another $60-70 billion a year will need to be wrung out of Canadian businesses and consumers, either through direct taxation and government spending or with regulatory browbeating to push Canadians’ savings and investments into global warming initiatives. Carney has made no effort to hide his agenda to browbeat businesses into joining his and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade. In a 2021 interview he declared, “We need a sustainable economy, and is your business aligned with that? Are your hiring practices consistent with that? Are you developing people in a way that’s consistent with that? Ultimately, what’s being asked of businesses when it comes to climate is, do you have a plan for net-zero? Canada has a legislated objective for net zero alongside another 130 countries.” “A Swedish teenager,” Carney continued, referring to Thunberg, “can figure out the carbon budget and that we have less than 10 years and you have to get to net-zero to stabilize it and if you’re a company and you have purpose, well, what’s your plan? And all these plans need to come together.” This is utter insanity: under Justin Trudeau Canada suffered rapidly declining business investment and now his successor wants the country’s business leaders to take financial planning directives from Greta Thunberg. While the federal government barrels down the road to net-zero impoverishment for Canada, everyone else is looking for the exit ramp. In January, six of the largest U.S. banks — JPMorganChase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley — quit the Carney-led net-zero banking alliance. Canada’s Big Six Banks — RBC, TD Bank, BMO, Scotiabank, CIBC and National Bank — have quit the initiative as well. Even Europe is beginning to back off on government piling climate obligations onto businesses in the name of fighting global warming. As the Wall Street Journal reports, the EU is watering down its climate accounting policies “amid pushback from member states and companies within the bloc over the new rules, which they say would have increased costs and reduced the competitiveness of their business.” Specifically, regulations previously scheduled for this year would have forced companies “to report in detail on their environmental, social and corporate-governance performance while making significant cuts to the emissions from within their supply chain.” The EU is now dropping, weakening or postponing many of these climate regulations, so that businesses will be able to better “grow, innovate, and create quality jobs.” This is effectively an admission that piling climate obligations and environmental reporting mandates onto businesses prevents them from growing, innovating and creating good jobs. Unfortunately, Mark Carney is all about climate obligations and reporting mandates. The road Canada is currently marching down for climate-related financial disclosures is based on a framework proposed by a task force Carney initiated in 2015. His aforementioned Thunberg-praising interview was not with an environmental journalist, but with Pivot Magazine, which is published by CPA Canada, the accounting industry’s national association. “We cannot get to net-zero without proper climate reporting,” he insisted, speaking of the need for “one core global standard” for climate accounting and reporting. A global climate reporting standard to help push trillions of dollars — yes, trillions with a “T” — from Canadian workers and taxpayers into Mark Carney and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade? After a decade of Justin Trudeau’s ruinous policies weakening Canada from coast to coast, there could be little worse for the country and its economy than a Liberal government led by Mark Carney." The Financial Post Cape Breton Politics Jason Boudreau · 1h · Big numbers in unions. 😁😁

Mar 25, 2025
Read more →