Fact Check: USA at War with Iran

Fact Check: USA at War with Iran

Published June 22, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: USA at War with Iran ## What We Know The claim that the "USA is at war with Iran" is nuanced and requires careful examination. As of no...

Fact Check: USA at War with Iran

What We Know

The claim that the "USA is at war with Iran" is nuanced and requires careful examination. As of now, the United States has not formally declared war on Iran. However, tensions have escalated significantly, particularly due to military buildups and recent airstrikes. Reports indicate that the U.S. has increased its military presence in the Persian Gulf, with thousands of Marines and advanced fighter jets deployed in response to Iran's nuclear advancements and aggressive actions in the region (AP News).

Moreover, recent developments have seen the U.S. conducting airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites, which President Trump announced, marking a significant escalation in military engagement (New York Times). The strikes targeted key facilities such as Fordo and Natanz, which are crucial to Iran's nuclear program (New York Times).

Despite these military actions, the situation remains complex. The U.S. has historically been involved in conflicts in the Middle East, but the current military operations do not constitute a formal declaration of war. Instead, they reflect ongoing hostilities and a reactive military posture towards Iran's actions (Washington Post).

Analysis

The evidence suggests that while the U.S. is not officially at war with Iran, it is engaged in military actions that could be interpreted as acts of war. The buildup of U.S. forces in the Persian Gulf is a clear indication of heightened tensions, particularly as Iran continues to enrich uranium and harass shipping in the Strait of Hormuz (AP News). The U.S. military's recent airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities represent a significant escalation and indicate a shift in U.S. policy towards a more aggressive stance against Iran's nuclear ambitions (New York Times).

However, the credibility of sources reporting on these developments varies. The Associated Press and The New York Times are generally regarded as reliable news outlets, providing thorough coverage of military and geopolitical issues. In contrast, some sources may have biases depending on their political affiliations or the narratives they promote. For instance, the framing of military actions can differ significantly based on whether the source is sympathetic to U.S. foreign policy or critical of it.

Additionally, while the U.S. has conducted airstrikes, the lack of a formal declaration of war means that the situation is not as clear-cut as a traditional wartime engagement. The U.S. has often engaged in military operations without declaring war, which complicates the interpretation of these actions (Council on Foreign Relations).

Conclusion

The claim that the "USA is at war with Iran" is Partially True. While there are significant military engagements and heightened tensions between the two nations, the absence of a formal declaration of war means that the situation is more accurately described as an ongoing conflict rather than a state of war. The U.S. military's actions, including troop deployments and airstrikes, indicate a serious escalation in hostilities, but they do not meet the traditional criteria for a declared war.

Sources

  1. Buildup of American forces in Persian Gulf a new signal of worsening US ...
  2. U.S. Enters War With Iran, Bombing Key Nuclear Sites
  3. Live Updates: U.S. Enters War With Iran, Bombing Key Nuclear Sites
  4. Israel-Iran live updates: U.S. warplanes carry out strikes on ...
  5. Here is the latest news on the U.S. strikes.
  6. U.S.、USA、America 有什么区别?
  7. Israel says it's preparing for possibly long war as Iran calls U.S ...
  8. Confrontation With Iran | Global Conflict Tracker - Council on Foreign ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: German was almost the language of the new USA
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: German was almost the language of the new USA

Detailed fact-check analysis of: German was almost the language of the new USA

Aug 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Donald trump is going to make usa great
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Donald trump is going to make usa great

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donald trump is going to make usa great

Aug 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: is apac rthe funder of usa politics
Partially True

Fact Check: is apac rthe funder of usa politics

Detailed fact-check analysis of: is apac rthe funder of usa politics

Aug 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: USA government burning food that was ment for Palistine
Partially True

Fact Check: USA government burning food that was ment for Palistine

Detailed fact-check analysis of: USA government burning food that was ment for Palistine

Jul 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: can illegal aliens collect any benefits in the usa
Partially True

Fact Check: can illegal aliens collect any benefits in the usa

Detailed fact-check analysis of: can illegal aliens collect any benefits in the usa

Jul 13, 2025
Read more →